-
- News
- Books
Featured Books
- design007 Magazine
Latest Issues
Current IssueLevel Up Your Design Skills
This month, our contributors discuss the PCB design classes available at IPC APEX EXPO 2024. As they explain, these courses cover everything from the basics of design through avoiding over-constraining high-speed boards, and so much more!
Opportunities and Challenges
In this issue, our expert contributors discuss the many opportunities and challenges in the PCB design community, and what can be done to grow the numbers of PCB designers—and design instructors.
Embedded Design Techniques
Our expert contributors provide the knowledge this month that designers need to be aware of to make intelligent, educated decisions about embedded design. Many design and manufacturing hurdles can trip up designers who are new to this technology.
- Articles
- Columns
Search Console
- Links
- Events
||| MENU - design007 Magazine
Altium’s Craig Arcuri on Design Rules: Past, Present, and Future
May 28, 2019 | Andy Shaughnessy, Design007 MagazineEstimated reading time: 3 minutes
We recently spoke with Altium’s Craig Arcuri about his views on design and manufacturing rules. Craig has experience running both design and manufacturing companies, so he has a fairly circumspect view of constraints from both sides of the product realization process. In this interview, Craig details some of the challenges with setting and managing hundreds of often divergent design and manufacturing rules, and how both design and manufacturing constraints need to evolve to better serve all of the stakeholders in PCB design.
Andy Shaughnessy: Craig, there seems to be a lot of disagreement about design and manufacturing rules, and it seems that there’s not much agreement on best practices. It’s very fragmented, and everyone does design rules their own way. As an EDA tool company guy, what are users asking you all for regarding design rules?
Craig Arcuri: Let me give you a different perspective. Of the last three companies I ran, one was a design company that did engineering design and used CAD tools to create data that was then passed on to manufacturing. Although we tried to care, and said we cared, we really didn’t worry about what happened after we sent the data out because that was somebody else’s problem. Then it was poetic justice that my last two companies were manufacturing companies that had to deal with those folks who didn’t really worry about what happened after the handoff to manufacturing!
You know the phrase “poop rolls downhill.” Well, the manufacturing folks are pretty close to the bottom. At the end of the day, the engineer and layout person have done their job, and a big pile of data comes down and lands on manufacturing. My job is to make a physical thing in less time with less money at a higher quality than is probably reasonably possible given the pile of poop that I was given. Over the course of the last 10 years, I’ve seen 200–300 unique customers per quarter send the data to the manufacturing people, from the perspective of being close to the bottom.
Some of the data comes from companies like Google, Tesla, Intel, and Microsoft. You might think that those companies would provide pristine data and that the design rules would be absolutely well-defined, followed, and implemented in the design EDA tool, and translated through the software into a package where I would think, “This is going to be a piece of cake. What am I going to do with all the money I’m going to make?”
You might also assume that the little guys come across with data out of CAD tools like Eagle and KiCad where a consistent database is a thing of dreams, and it’s a bunch of disconnected data that may or may not have any sanity to it. But you would be sadly mistaken. Across the board, manufacturers rarely receive a data package where manufacturing rules have been considered, adhered to, or worked around, and where the data has been presented in a way that shows that. The instructions are almost never clear and the board can’t always be built.
Now, I won’t put all of the blame on the designer or engineer. If you look at companies like Apple or Samsung, they expect most of the products they design to go into volume production very quickly. Regardless of their size, companies that expect a product to go in volume production clearly consider design rules and manufacturing issues during the design process. They "design for manufacturing," as opposed to "design with manufacturing."
To read this entire interview, which appeared in the May 2019 issue of Design007 Magazine, click here.
Suggested Items
GlobalFoundries Commits to Achieving Net Zero Emissions and Carbon-Neutral Power by 2050
04/23/2024 | GlobalFoundriesGlobalFoundries (GF) is furthering its commitment to sustainable operations and fighting climate change with the announcement of two new long-term goals to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and 100% carbon-neutral power by 2050.
ROHM Group Company SiCrystal and STMicroelectronics Expand Silicon Carbide Wafer Supply Agreement
04/23/2024 | ROHMROHM and STMicroelectronics, a global semiconductor leader serving customers across the spectrum of electronics applications, announced today the expansion of the existing multi-year, long-term 150mm silicon carbide (SiC) substrate wafers supply agreement with SiCrystal, a ROHM group company.
IDTechEx Report Unveils 3D Electronics Status and Opportunities
04/22/2024 | PRNewswire3D electronics is an emerging manufacturing approach that enables electronics to be integrated within or onto the surface of objects. 3D electronic manufacturing techniques empower new features, including mass customizability, greater integration, and improved sustainability in the electronics industry.
Altus Group Helps BitBox Unlock Productivity and Efficiency Gains with New Reflow Oven
04/22/2024 | Altus GroupAltus Group, a leading provider of capital equipment, has recently assisted BitBox, a UK-based electronics design, engineering and manufacturing company in upgrading its operations with the implementation of a new reflow oven from Heller Industries.
Growth Potential: Electronics Manufacturing Driving Massive Surge in Manufacturing Investment
04/22/2024 | Shawn DuBravac, IPCIn the early months of the pandemic, investment in manufacturing infrastructure, such as plants and production facilities, declined sharply. Real investment dropped over 11%, before finally recovering to pre-pandemic levels in the first half of 2022. Over the past two years, however, several factors have combined to drive manufacturing investment to record levels.