The PCB Norsemen: Don't Forget AABUS

JanPedersen-PCBMar19.JPGLast spring, I wrote a column focusing on cosmetic issues and I asked, “Why does the electronics industry reject good products when it’s not always needed?” In my next column, I turned the coin around and asked if we have understood the workmanship rule correctly: “Printed boards shall be free of non-conformances in excess of those allowed in this specification.” I ended the column by asking, “So, what can we learn from this?”

The most important thing is to know the standard and how to use it. Most people read the measurable requirements, while a requirement like the workmanship rule is left out. Leaving out the workmanship can make it hard to agree, because it requires at least two parties to find a solution that works for both.

This, however, leads us here, where we shall discuss AABUS, what it means, how to handle it, and basically a list of issues that need AABUS.

Why Do We Even Need an Agreement?
First, AABUS means “As Agreed Between User and Supplier.” As already mentioned, an agreement needs two parties, and those two need to find a common solution. The problem with such cases is why we need that agreement. It can obviously be something that can be seen from two sides and end up with a very different understanding if you don’t talk together. However, in the IPC standard it could even be a measurable parameter, but the standard has left the solution to be agreed upon.  

So, let's go to the source. We look into IPC-6012E, the performance specification for rigid PCBs and supported by the acceptability standard IPC-A-600K. Reading the first pages of IPC-6012E, the document scope, we find the first reference:

1.3.1.1: Requirement Deviations: Requirements deviation from “these heritage classifications” SHALL be as agreed between user and supplier.  

This means, anything you want that is different from IPC Class 1, 2, or 3 shall be specified. Then in 1.3.3.1 we read:

“The procurement documentation SHALL specify those requirements that are a result of the selection process within this specification. This includes ALL references to AABUS. If the requirement selection is not made in the procurement documentation including all related documents, then the default requirements in IPC-6012E Table 1-2 SHALL apply.

Then the standard gives us a selection system, and the default requirements. But frankly speaking, a lot of the requirements are not what you expect or are at least still open for discussion. As an example, the IPC-6012E still specifies solder coating as Sn63/Pb37.

A Burden for the Buyer’s Knowledge
If we now jump to A-600K, the acceptability of the boards you receive, the “approach of this document” says, “This document cannot cover all of the reliability concerns encountered in the Printed Board Industry, therefore attributes not addressed in this issue SHALL be AABUS.” So, using IPC standards for PCBs leaves a substantial burden on the buyer to know the standard and to specify requirements not clearly written in the standard.

Quite a few attributes need to be discussed, unless you simply trust that your chosen supplier will be kind and accept a remake if the boards cannot be used as a result of wrong hole tolerances, or surface finish solderability—just because you did not mention the usage of those boards.

Back to the Workmanship requirement. We find this both in IPC-6012E and A-600K. Where IPC-6012 says, “Printed boards shall be free of non-conformances in excess of those allowed in this specification,” A-600K takes it to the next level stating, “Acceptance of imperfections not specifically covered by this document SHALL be AABUS.

For the discussion of those imperfections typically referred to by the PCB supplier as “cosmetic issues,” please read my last column, “Attacking the Loophole That Does Not Exist.”

In IPC-6012E you find the term AABUS around 50 times (some are repeated in tables, etc.). In IPC-A-600K, it is mentioned 22 times. What does this tell us? It tells us that we have to be aware. Some of the attributes are not that important for all of us, but you can be sure that you will find some attributes impacting almost every printed board design.

So, What Are the AABUS?

The General One

We already mentioned the selection process within IPC-6012E, paragraph 1.3.3.1, that includes all references to AABUS and any requirement deviation—anything you need that is not mentioned in the standard. Or, if you want to combine IPC classes such as general requirements to Class 2, but copper plating to Class 3.

The Most Important Ones

3.3.1: “When edge spacing is not designed in accordance with IPC-2222, nicks, crazing, delamination and haloing SHALL be AABUS.” If you overlook this rule, you could easily be forced to pay for boards that basically don’t meet your reliability requirements. Many designers are forced to utilise the space to the limit, placing traces closer to the outline that brings the design and the final PCB into this situation. The supplier should warn you, but not if the design meets their capabilities. 

3.4: Printed Board Dimensional Requirements SHALL be defined as per IPC-6012E 3.4 unless otherwise AABUS.” You cannot come after delivery and call for tighter tolerances, or you may end up with a higher unit price based on requirements revealed in the EQ process.

3.4.2: “Annular Ring and Breakout external: The use of teardrop designed pads for class 3 SHALL be AABUS. The same is 3.6.2.9 for inner layer pads.” If you fail to add teardrops, you could end up with inner layer trace-to-pad junction breakout. This could be a true reliability issue causing field error. 

3.4.3: “Bow and twist requirements for the array SHALL be AABUS.” This is probably the most overlooked rule in IPC-6012. Most of us believe the bow and twist rule is for the customer panel but it is not, unless this is part of your requirement specification. This also means panel frame design is critical to secure a flat panel even after the first soldering process. And, if you shall be 100% sure, you should specify that bow and twist assessment shall be done after one thermal process. This is even more important if the construction is unbalanced, as mentioned in paragraph 2.3.4, and such requirements will lead your supplier to check the construction.

3.6: “Structural Integrity: A/B coupons shall be used unless AABUS.” This paragraph also leads us to the evaluation of Table 4-2 sampling plan and Table 4-3 acceptance testing and frequency. The supplier will probably not use A/B coupons unless you specify it, or if the supplier has a focus on defense and other industries where customers typically have a focus on these coupons. Coupons are widely used in the U.S., less in Europe, and very seldom in Asia. That means you need to specify if you want the IPC A/B coupons to be used. I would argue for using the PCB itself for lot qualification microsections.

3.6.2.11: Plating thickness. Deviations to Tables 3-3 through 3-6 of IPC-6012E SHALL be AABUS.” This may very well happen in tight HDI designs! In such cases it is important that your design calculates for thinner copper, and that this is agreed upon with your supplier.

3.6.2.11.3: “Requirements to bumps and dimples in copper filled microvias SHALL be AABUS.” It is quite strange that IPC has chosen not to specify the requirements to a flat surface of copper-filled blind vias. The requirement is there for resin-filled vias, so why not for copper-filled? If your assembly requires a flat surface, you should specify the requirement, or you can refer to IPC-6012EM, the Medical Addendum to IPC-6012, where this is specified.

3.7.1 f: “Solder mask encroachment on rectangular SMT pads with pitch less than 0.65 mm SHALL be AABUS.” Be aware of the challenge to avoid encroachment on rectangular SMT pads, especially when pitch is less than 0.65 mm. Many customers are not aware of this limit in the standard.

3.7.3: Solder mask thickness requirements SHALL be AABUS.” This is the AABUS most used in PCB specifications and corporate requirements. It is damaging for solder paste printing when solder mask gets too thick, and of course we fear exposed copper if it gets too thin.

3.9.2: “Cleanliness testing after solder mask only when specified.” The standard asks the designer and buyer to specify if such a test is required. The challenge is, the test method specified in IPC-6012E, IPC-TM-650-2.3.25 was designed for process control, and not a proof test of cleanliness on the finished board. I suggest using the specification in IPC-6012DA (revision E comes in 2021).

3.11: “Repair—the allowance and requirements for repair of bare printed board SHALL be AABUS.” Many people, including PCB suppliers, claim that IPC-6012 accepts track welding. This is not correct. It has been the rule for many years that any repair shall be AABUS.

4.3: “Deviation from IPC-6012E Quality Conformance testing SHALL be AABUS.” Very few suppliers follow strictly the quality conformance test requirements as mentioned in IPC-6012E Table 4-4. I recommend checking with your factory to see whether they follow this requirement; if not, find out why. From my experience, some of these tests such as Dielectric Withstanding Voltage, and Moisture and Insulation Resistance, are done once only.

Some of the Rare Ones
Some of the AABUS requirements are very special and rarely used, such as: nickel barrier and electroless gold, electrodeposited tin, lead-free solder coating, and heat sink material. “Deviations to 6012E SHALL be AABUS,” which tells us there are many variations in the market and we cannot have all such variations into a general standard.

Lessons Learned—Good Product Specification
The lesson learned from reading all the AABUS references in IPC-6012E and A-600K tells me that the burden to secure a product in compliance with your requirements and expectations lies in a good product specification, where you have answered most of the AABUS references in the standard.

By doing this, you ensure that the quotation you receive is in compliance with your design and product requirements, and that you avoid unwanted surprises when you receive the first boards.

This column originally appeared in the April 2021 issue of PCB007 Magazine.

Back

2021

The PCB Norsemen: Don't Forget AABUS

04-28-2021

The most important thing is to know a standard and how to use it. Here is all you need to know about AABUS, what it means, how to handle it, and basically a list of issues that needs AABUS.

View Story

The PCB Norsemen: Attacking the Loophole That Does Not Exist

02-16-2021

When producing PCBs, we follow IPC standards for Qualification Performance and Acceptance from design, through production, to customer incoming inspection and acceptance. However, there is always a way of writing a standard and a different way of interpreting it.

View Story
Back

2020

The PCB Norsemen: Leading by Going the Extra Mile

12-22-2020

This year has been far from normal. Here, Didrik Bech shares how "doing a little extra" often can change a lot, as well as his experience of how to attract new colleagues, welcome them, train them, and include them in the company's culture and style/methodology of leadership.

View Story

The PCB Norsemen: So Much More Than Just Through Vias

11-17-2020

As most people know, component holes are still highly necessary for components that require them, and clean lead-through-holes (vias) have increased in necessity over the last 30 years. John Steinar Johnsen explains how the challenges with smaller diameter vias, perhaps depth-controlled, have increased and are, in some cases, challenging for those who produce PCBs and have to assemble and handle solder components.

View Story

The PCB Norsemen: A Path to Successful PCB Fabrication

09-28-2020

In the PCB fabrication process, there can be multiple actors involved. How can you ensure that all these actors are cooperating to maximize the positive effects and minimize the negative effects of the pillars of PCB fabrication? It might sound like an insurmountable task, but Didrik Bech shares a path that can increase your chances of success.

View Story

The PCB Norsemen: Leadership Styles for Success

08-18-2020

Leadership is the foundation of a successful business. Elmatica CEO Didrik Bech looks deeper into the various styles of leadership and shares his experiences and opinions.

View Story

PCB Norsemen: The Importance of Quality Management

06-19-2020

Most companies have a quality management system, but the important factor is not if you have one; it's about how that system is implemented in your company's values, strategies, and goals. Didrik Bech explains how you can use your QMS as a competitive advantage and shares five top reasons for having one.

View Story

The PCB Norsemen: It’s All About Being Prepared

05-15-2020

COVID-19, known globally by now, and buzzwords like social distancing, isolation, home office, antibac, and lockdowns, are humming in every ear. Raymond Goh explores how this will impact the electronics industry and how to respond. Humans tend to stick to habits. Will the same happen to PCB production?

View Story

The PCB Norsemen: Can Better Guidelines on Cosmetic Failures ‘Save’ Functioning PCBs?

05-05-2020

Every year, fully functional PCBs are scrapped due to cosmetic “failures” that are not approved. Is this right, or do we need to make an even more precise set of rules on how to handle this? Jan Pedersen shares his thoughts on the issue.

View Story

The PCB Norsemen: What Are the True Benefits of Going Digital?

04-06-2020

2019 might have been the year when the trend word digitalization really kicked off and transitioned from being a buzzword to aligning with keywords and concepts as AI and IoT. Didrick Bech explores the future of digitization, which is already here.

View Story

The PCB Norsemen: Automotive Standard Elevates the Excellence of Electronics

01-19-2020

IPC-6012DA (currently in WAM1) was the first automotive standard for printed boards; it also needs to expand to cover all types of rigid printed boards. To meet the PCB needs in the automotive industry of today and tomorrow, we have started to collect information and identify the types of printed boards not covered by the existing standard. One finding in the research is printed boards used for LED headlights and taillights, which have two requirements not covered; these are described as metal-core printed boards and high-power printed boards.

View Story

The PCB Norsemen: New Trends in the PCB Industry at productronica 2019

01-02-2020

Working with PCB technology and standardization as I do, it is always interesting to see the new trends and where the PCB industry is moving. Changes tend to happen at a slow pace; still, I visited productronica this year for dedicated meetings and expected to learn about new processes and production equipment. What hit me was the different manufacturing focus between Asia and Europe. 5G applications and smartphones—both making an impact in the news as a high focus in Asia, where most of the production is placed—were hardly mentioned at productronica 2019. However, I picked up on other new trends in the PCB industry.

View Story
Back

2019

The Laminate Market: What Will the Future Bring?

11-04-2019

PCBs have been manufactured more or less the same way since we entered the industry in 1972, but the circumstances surrounding the boards have changed. The PCB Norsemen have addressed the copper situation several times in our columns as well as the component crisis affecting the PCB industry. Now, we’re experiencing external factors—such as Brexit and the trade restrictions between China and the U.S.—that are affecting the industry and causing delays due to raw material demand and prioritization by huge market players.

View Story

The PCB Norsemen: Avoid Failures in PCB Production With Compliance Control

08-08-2019

Failures and reliability in the printed circuit industry are usually considered in the context of quality claims and non-conformity. This is a logical approach; however, there is a new context where these aspects are under close scrutiny, namely compliance—especially in the defense industry. Failing to understand import and export compliance for every country you deliver to and from will, at some point, result in challenges in your supply chain with potentially severe ramifications.

View Story

The PCB Norsemen: From Wooden Huts to Homemade Go-karts—It All Starts With Design!

07-08-2019

Whether building the coolest go-kart or the most sophisticated electronic hardware, the story is the same: It starts with design. And for designers and manufacturers, early involvement and commitment between all the involved parties in a product development process diminish the risk for mistakes and misunderstandings.

View Story

What Is Reliability Without Traceability?

06-27-2019

High reliability and compliance are hot topics at conferences all over the world. If you are a supplier to industries like defense, automotive, medical, and aerospace/space, high-reliability and regulatory compliance are strict demands for electronic device manufacturers. This column discusses how high-reliability demands enforce the need for traceability, and at what level the traceability should be.

View Story

The PCB Norsemen: Merging the Best of Both Worlds—Young Superheroes and Knowledgeable Wizards!

05-29-2019

Companies that dare be true to themselves, trust their employees, and provide direction, freedom, and responsibility to their most important asset—namely, their employees—are more likely to succeed. However, we can all rattle behind these positive words and agree with these statements. The real question is, “How do you actually create and sustain an environment that motivates and attracts people—especially millennials—in the wave of Industry 4.0?"

View Story

The PCB Norsemen: My Flexible Story—Flex Circuit Development Through the Decades

04-30-2019

Senior Technical Advisor Jan Pedersen is celebrating 26 years at Elmatica. In this column, he shares his thoughts from his long experience in this exciting industry, and talks about those things that have changed a lot in the past few decades, and the others that haven't.

View Story

A PCB Broker’s Guide Through the Galaxy of Automation

04-05-2019

A smart factory is defined by its ability to harness manufacturing data flowing throughout the enterprise and then convert that data into intelligent information that can be used to create improvements in productivity, efficiency, savings, yields, automation, enabled traceability, compliance, and reduced risk of errors and rework. All of these items are crucial factors when manufacturing printed circuits.

View Story

The PCB Norsemen: Technology’s Future Comes Together—A Great Slogan for Us All!

02-13-2019

“Technology’s Future Comes Together” was the theme of this year's IPC APEX EXPO, which is quite suitable during these changing times. I guess we all need to come together, especially the automotive industry.

View Story

The PCB Norsemen: PCB Standards for Medical Device Applications—A Hard Nut to Crack!

02-04-2019

With digitalization, AI, and IoT, the traceability and transparency to how a PCB is produced will be even more important. We must rule out the PCBs that follow the standards to the ones that do not. The day will come when you or someone you know might need a medical device, and you want to make sure it does its job correctly.

View Story
Back

2018

Digital Specs for Automated Manufacturing: Find the Missing Link!

11-29-2018

Automation and connected smart factories are the new manufacturing trend. Industry 4.0 and the Internet of things (IoT) continue to enter PCB manufacturing. However, if we continue down the same path with specifications and requirements written on electronic papers and unintelligent production files, human interpretation is still crucial to avoid mistakes. CircuitData could solve this problem because having one language for automated smart factories is the future!

View Story

PCB Norsemen: The Solution to the UL Challenge—Industrial Awareness

08-28-2018

Writes Jan Pedersen: The solder-limit subject has been a "hot potato" for a quite some time, with many discussions around the new requirement from Underwriters Laboratories (UL) that UL’s Emma Hudson brought to attention in early 2018.

View Story

The PCB Norsemen: Lean Challenges—Standard vs. Non-Standard Products

08-06-2018

Writes Didrick Bech: People tend to treat standard and non-standard products in the same way; however, they represent two parallel product segments and consequently different challenges for your Lean manufacturing process, especially in relation to production and logistical operations. When you fail to differentiate the processing of standard and non-standard products, not only is the Lean manufacturing process disrupted, but you also introduce a variety of production, financial and logistical challenges.

View Story

The Velocity of Technology— What Does It Really Mean?

07-02-2018

PCB Norseman, Jan Pedersen: Driving a car is probably one of the areas where the user comes in direct touch with the technology development. And we understand the speed when we see how fast we get new versions of smartphones and other gadgets. But in what direction are we going?

View Story
Back

2017

Industry 4.0, AI and CircuitData

11-14-2017

PCB Norseman, Andreas Lydersen: As automation works its way onto the shop floors, it still struggles to replace humans in the supporting roles, such as designers, purchasers, brokers, and back-office staff. Where automation on the shop floor replaces humans in doing repetitive manual tasks, the supporting roles (at least some of them) require intelligence to understand and utilise information.

View Story
Copyright © 2021 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.