Fresh PCB Concepts: How Do You Calculate Finished Copper?

Reading time ( words)

NCAB_RubenContreras.jpgHow do you calculate finished copper on a PCB? This may sound simple. But we have seen copper thickness called out either on the drawing or the specification, which can lead to additional engineering questions (EQs) and, in some cases, additional costs. These are unintentional results as a misunderstanding of what is requested—not in all cases, but some. Let’s start with some terminology.

Ounces relates to the weight of copper that covers one square foot (Figure 1). The area of the board itself cannot change; it’s fixed. But as the weight of copper increases, so does the thickness of the copper deposit. What does ½ ounce, 1 ounce, or 2 ounces really mean? There is a perception that ½ ounce equals 17 microns (0.669 mils), 1 ounce equals 35 microns (1.377 mils), and 2 ounces will give you 70 microns (2.756 mils). While that’s pretty close, it’s not strictly true.


Figure 1: A sheet of copper.

This brings us to IPC—specifically IPC-6012, which is the qualification and performance standard for rigid PCBs. Let’s start with the internal layer foil thickness (Table 1).


Table 1: Table 3-13 in IPC-6012. (Source: IPC)

If we consider 1 ounce, we can see that this actually equates to 34.3 microns, (1.350 mils) as the target for the foil manufacturer. However, this also allows for a 10% tolerance on the produced foils, which means that a 1-ounce inner layer foil could be received at the PCB factory with a thickness of 30.9 microns (1.217 mils). From there, we also see that there is a 6-micron (0.236-mil) reduction allowed for the pretreatment of the copper foil during the process at the PCB factory before imaging and bonding. After processing, the minimum copper foil thickness for 1 ounce of copper foil may be 24.9 microns (0.980 mils), which is a little different than the 35 microns perceived.

Where we see the potential challenges is when we see the thickness for inner layers specified as 35 microns minimum. This means that to achieve the 35 microns (1.377 mils) as the foil thickness after processing, we would need to start with 2 ounces, which would provide 55.7 microns (2.193 mils).

Let’s now look at external or outer layers, where this becomes a little bit more complex. As the industry standard, IPC-6012 relates to base copper weights rather than finished copper (Table 2).


Table 2: Table 3-14 in IPC-6012. (Source: IPC)

IPC Table 3-14 shows us that the minimum surface conductive finish of the finished copper is equal to the absolute minimum copper foil thickness, plus an average copper plating thickness of 20 microns (0.787 mils) for Class 2, and 25 microns (0.984 mils) for Class 3, minus the maximum processing reduction allowance. Let’s see what happens when a customer calls for 1 ounce finished.

We know that IPC minimum for 1-ounce copper weight equates to 30.9 microns (1.217 mils). If we start with ½ ounce, 15.4 microns (0.606 mils), plus plating of 20 microns (0.787 mils) for Class 2 or 25 microns (0.984 mils) for Class 3, and then allow for process reduction of 2 microns (0.079 mils), we can see that we will finish with 33.4 microns (1.315 mils) for Class 2 and 38.4 microns (1.512 mils) for Class 3.

This is pretty clear, and again, close to the 1-ounce (35-micron) perception. But this is a different story as copper weights increase. If we look at the 2-ounce (70-micron), this is based on the perception that we have 35 microns to start, plus an additional 35 microns or 1-ounce base plating. If we start with 1 ounce or 30.9 microns (1.217 mils), plus plating of 20 microns (0.787 mils) for Class 2 or 25 microns (0.984 mils) for Class 3, and then allow for processing reductions of 3 microns (0.118 mils), we will finish with 47.9 microns (1.886 mils) for Class 2 or 52.9 microns (2.083 mils) for Class 3.

When we see drawings that call for a specific thickness such as 70 microns (2.756 mils) or 70 microns minimum, we have to start with 2-ounce base copper foil and plate up to achieve a finished thickness of 78.7 microns (3.098 mils) for Class 2 products or 83.7 microns (3.295 mils) for Class 3.

This has a notable impact on costs as there is a difference when quoting with a 1-ounce copper base or 2 ounces. This is why you may see questions from your PCB supplier as we seek to clarify what copper thickness you need, and what base copper thickness we should be starting with. We always want to help you avoid any unneeded additional costs in your PCB design. And, as always, if there are any questions on this or anything to do with your PCB design, I am happy to help.

Ruben Contreras is a program manager and field application engineer at NCAB Group.



Suggested Items

I-Connect007 Editor’s Choice: Five Must-Reads for the Week

10/23/2020 | Andy Shaughnessy, Design007 Magazine
After a crazy year like this, we shouldn’t be surprised that this trade show season is unlike any other. Here’s one of the many “silver linings” of 2020: We actually dodged a bullet earlier this year when COVID-19 hit after most of our industry’s big events had taken place. In this week’s top five, we have an assortment of trade show and conference news items, plus a few examples of technological trends and innovation.

I-Connect007 Editor's Choice: Five Must-Reads for the Week

10/09/2020 | Andy Shaughnessy, Design007 Magazine
It’s showtime! This past week, we saw quite a bit of news about virtual trade shows. It’s great to see show managers pivot from live, in-person events to virtual shows with only a few months to make it all happen. How would you like to be a show manager today?

Combatting Thermal Challenges With TRM Software

10/07/2020 | I-Connect007 Editorial Team
Johannes Adam is the creator of a simulation tool called Thermal Risk Management (TRM) used to help PCB designers and design engineers predict hot spots on the board before during layout. He and Douglas Brooks, founder of UltraCAD Design, have used the tool to produce several technical articles and a book on the subject. In this interview, they tackle the biggest misconceptions they see from designers and engineers who deal with thermal management issues.

Copyright © 2020 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.