Just Ask Tara Dunn: What Is the Thickest Flex Layer Available?
November 13, 2020 | I-Connect007 Editorial TeamEstimated reading time: 1 minute
First, we asked you to send in your questions for Happy Holden, Joe Fjelstad, John Mitchell, and others in our “Just Ask” series. Now, it’s Tara Dunn’s turn! Tara is the vice president of marketing and business development for Averatek. A regular Flex007 columnist, Tara discusses flexible circuits, rigid-flex, and rigid PCBs, as well as RF/microwave technology, microelectronics, and additive processes. She is also co-founder of Geek-a-Palooza and a show manager for the SMTA Additive Electronics TechXchange event. She has over 20 years of experience in the PCB industry. We hope you enjoy “Just Ask Tara.”
Q: What is the maximum thickness of a single flex layer, not just for a test vehicle but a flexible circuit layer manufactured commercially?
A: There are a lot of different ways to answer this question. There are examples of flexible circuits being manufactured with 10-ounce copper bonded to dielectric. In this case, the “body” of the flexible circuit is typically etched to a thinner copper for flexibility and leaves the contact fingers with the thicker copper.
Looking at what laminate thickness are commercially available for fabricators, Dupont provides a laminate with 0.005” dielectric, bonded on each side to four-ounce copper, with 0.003” adhesive. That is an extremely thick laminate, at 0.0222”. The most common flexible laminates are much thinner, with half-ounce or one-ounce copper bonded to 0.001” or 0.002” polyimide, resulting in thicknesses of 0.0024–0.0068”, depending on adhesive requirements, dielectric thicknesses, and copper weight.
To submit your questions for Tara, click here.
Testimonial
"Our marketing partnership with I-Connect007 is already delivering. Just a day after our press release went live, we received a direct inquiry about our updated products!"
Rachael Temple - AlltematedSuggested Items
Elementary, Mr. Watson: The Four Horsemen of Copper Confusion
11/12/2025 | John Watson -- Column: Elementary, Mr. WatsonIf there were a PCB Design Dictionary of Confusing Terms, the cover would feature four words that have baffled generations of engineers: polygons, pours, planes, and floods—or what I refer to as the four horsemen of copper confusion. They sound simple, as if they belong in a geometry textbook or a weather report, but in PCB design, they overlap, develop, and sound interchangeable until you realize they aren't.
Alpha Insights, Performance by Design: Understanding Heat at the Core of Every Design
11/11/2025 | Team Alpha -- Column: Alpha Insights: Performance by DesignPower isn’t just about current. It’s about control. As electronic systems grow smaller and faster, every amp and every layer generates a new source of heat. That heat is more than a byproduct. It’s a measure of efficiency, a benchmark of performance, and often the first indication of failure.
The Shaughnessy Report: Zee Plane! Zee Plane!
11/11/2025 | Andy Shaughnessy -- Column: The Shaughnessy ReportPlanes aren’t magic, but they are big time-savers. Without planes, designers would have to create thousands of traces to accomplish the same objectives. You can imagine the first time a designer thought about using a sheet of copper, asking, “Hey, why am I killing myself laying out all these traces? Can’t I just use this sheet of copper instead?”
November 2025 Design007 Magazine: Proper Plane Design
11/10/2025 | I-Connect007 Editorial TeamWithout planes, designers would have to create thousands of traces to accomplish the same objectives. Power planes provide low impedance and stable power to every component on the board, much like a large power bus. Ground planes stabilize reference voltage, improve thermal performance, and help preclude EMI issues. Power and ground plane design is often a battle of tradeoffs.
Trouble in Your Tank: Understanding Interconnect Defects, Part 1
11/04/2025 | Michael Carano -- Column: Trouble in Your TankThis month, I’ll address interconnect defects (ICDs). While this defect continues to rear its ugly head, don’t despair. There are solutions, most of which center on process control and understanding the relationship of the chemistry, materials, and equipment. First, though, let’s discuss ICDs.