Electrical Test: Surface Finish vs. Water Marks

Reading time ( words)

After a brief time off and a successful IPC APEX EXPO, I’m here to field your questions and get back to business. Thank you to all that stopped by to see me at the show. It was a good year in San Diego and the weather (as usual) mostly cooperated. Looks like we’ll all be heading back to Vegas next year!

This month we will look at the ballet of sorts, performed by electrical test vs. surface finishes— namely witness marks. Over time, new finishes have come to market. Some allow better conductivity while others reduce overall cost of precious materials. Regardless of the finish, electrical test must be performed on these circuits. With that comes the caveat of how much of a witness mark can be left on any given landing pad and still be acceptable to the CM or the final OEM user.

First, we must understand what a witness mark actually is. In “down home” terms, when building a fence the old-fashioned way, you typically hammer the planks of the fence to the supporting framework. When the hammer hits the nail, the hammer leaves (unless you are really good) a round indentation into the board you are attaching, a.k.a. a witness mark! This is a mark indicating the historic process that was applied. Witness marks in electrical test are much the same. When an electrical test is performed, a physical contact is made from the machine to the PCB. This works the same whether it is from a translator fixture on a bed of nails or the direct contact from a flying probe. The combination of the surface finish being used and the type of electrical tester being used can produce a wide array of witness marks. Most of these marks are benign and acceptable, but in severe cases they can be destructive resulting in costly rework or even worse, scrap!

Some finishes are more critical than others. These range from HASL, immersion tin and ENIG, to the critical finishes such as immersion gold, immersion silver, soft gold and the ultimately delicate wire-bond. Customer requirements and industry specifications have guidelines regarding what acceptable witness marks may be. In the general specification for the manufacture of PWBs, the specification references the “pristine area” of the landing pad when gauging the acceptability of the witness mark. For a rectangle SMT landing pad, the pristine area is defined by the central 80% of the land width x 80% of the land length. For round SMT landing pads, the pristine area is defined as the central 80% of the diameter. Electrical test probe witness marks within the pristine area for Class I, Class II and Class III are considered cosmetic in nature and are acceptable provided the requirements of the final finish are met (IPC-6012C).

As noted earlier, witness marks may be different depending on the type of test solution being used. Fixtures use either solid pins or spring pins with different options for head styles. These can be round (conical), spear point or even chisel point. The main goal for Electrical test is to perform the test required while minimizing the witness mark to the PCB. Many are under of the opinion that fixtures are the main source of pad damage resulting from electrical test and in many cases this is true. Due to the mechanics of the fixture, translator pins, stripper plates (cassettes) there are many factors in play that can cause a pin to “lock” and apply excessive pressure/force to the delicate landing pad.

Read The Full Article Here

Editor's Note: This article originally appeared in the April issue of The PCB Magazine.


Suggested Items

John W. Mitchell: Fire Your Hiring Habits

03/23/2023 | Pete Starkey, I-Connect007
On the Wednesday of IPC APEX EXPO week, IPC President and CEO Dr. John W. Mitchell stylishly delivered his keynote address, “Fire Your Hiring Habits!” to a packed ballroom full of round tables all immaculately laid for a sit-down lunch. Announced by IPC Hall-of-Famer Joe O’Neil with a Rolling Stones track in the background, Mitchell’s presentation, subtitled “Finding and keeping the best talent is fundamental to building electronics better,” offered relevant and valuable guidance on understanding human nature and how this knowledge can help you find and keep the right individuals for your organisation.

Advancing in a New Era

03/22/2023 | John W. Mitchell, IPC
What goes down must also come up. This is not the idiom we’re used to hearing, but I’d like to apply it to IPC APEX EXPO 2023. After a few years of lower attendance numbers due to the COVID pandemic, 2023 ushered in a re-invigorated group of attendees, exhibitors, speakers, event contractors, and staff to the show floor and meeting rooms. IPC APEX EXPO 2023 was fueled by the possibilities of new advances in electronics manufacturing.

A Promising Future for Automation

03/21/2023 | Christopher Bonsell, Chemcut
This year, I had the great opportunity to come to IPC APEX EXPO in San Diego as a contributing member in Chemcut’s booth. Being an exhibitor is always interesting because you never know what you will learn or who you will meet. Truly, it seems that every IPC APEX EXPO is an eye-opening experience. This was the second show I attended, and last year I was amazed to see how in-depth and interconnected the electronics industry is. Seeing how many different companies contribute to manufacturing today’s core technology never fails to impress me.

Copyright © 2023 I-Connect007 | IPC Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.