Which IPC-A-610 Class is Best for Your PCBA?


Reading time ( words)

When you think about what makes a good electronics assembly, what are the most common expectations that come to mind? If the assembly works as intended, then surely that indicates a certain level of acceptability, right? But what about the product's longer-term reliability? And what if you'd also like it to look good too?

Printed circuit board assembly (PCBA) is a surprisingly complex thing. There’s the PCB itself with all of its materials, finishes, and various components, and the solder that holds everything together. Within that, there’s also a fair amount of scope for things to be good, bad, or somewhere in between.

For many electronics manufacturing services (EMS) providers, IPC-A-610: Acceptability of Electronic Assemblies is the agreed standard that we use to define what's acceptable and what's not in the world of PCBA production. The standard is comprised of three Classes: 1, 2, and 3. As an original equipment manufacturer (OEM), it’s important that you're clear on the basic principles that separate those classes so that you have a clear and realistic expectation of what the results are going to be.

Class 1

The lowest IPC-A-610 class, Class 1, is the most lenient when it comes to making allowances for potential defects. When we think of the functionality of the electronics assembly within a simple toy, for example, the PCBA is likely to be hidden well away inside the body of the item, so the quality of the solder joints or component positions may not be such a high priority. The product is also likely to be manufactured to very tight margins (read "as cheaply as possible"). So, as long as the item still functions as expected and its operational life sits within an acceptable timeframe, then that will probably be sufficient.

Class 2

Class 2 is typically the most requested for non-critical electronic assemblies where longer-term reliability is desirable, but perhaps not essential. Class 2 still allows for a certain degree of imperfection. Surface-mount components that have been placed slightly off pad, for instance, are usually still fine electrically and mechanically even though they may look wrong aesthetically.

Class 3

The highest standard of IPC-A-610 is Class 3, which means an electronic assembly must be built per all of the IPC criteria. This includes laminate selection, plating thickness, material qualifications, manufacturing processes, and inspection. Typically, Class 3 is aimed at more critical PCB assemblies.

However, achieving that standard may also come at a premium. It might be necessary to slow down the surface-mount machines to ensure the desired placement accuracy, which will mean a longer build time and additional cost. It may also be necessary to make allowance for higher degrees of scrap in cases where materials can’t be reworked or to allow time for extra inspection or additional cleaning.

Working With Your EMS partner

Many would argue that a reliable EMS provider will always aim to manufacture the products they build to the Class 3 standard, regardless. Any EMS provider that is genuinely serious about compliance is also undoubtedly going to have well-established internal training programs to promote awareness within their manufacturing facility. Also, this compliance is likely to extend not just to the inspection of the end products but also to monitoring every process of the build. The best way to achieve this and maintain the standards required will be for them to appoint in-house IPC trainers who will be externally re-certified.

In the majority of cases, the IPC-A-610 standard will suffice, but there may be situations where an OEM prefers to produce their own criteria to either enhance or replace the existing standard. If you do choose to create your own set of guidelines, then it will be important to ensure that your EMS partner is crystal clear about your expectations from the outset. Thus, you should reference your specific criteria on every request for quotation (RFQ) or purchase order that you submit.

Neil Sharp is the director of marketing for JJS Manufacturing.

Share

Print


Suggested Items

Practical Implementation of Assembly Processes for Low Melting Point Solder Pastes (Part 1)

07/16/2019 | Adam Murling, Miloš Lazić, and Don Wood, Indium Corporation; and Martin Anselm, Rochester Institute of Technology
Since 2006 and the implementation of the RoHS directive, the interest in bismuth-tin solder alloys—whose melting point around 140°C is very desirable because it allows for the use of lower temperature laminate materials and reduces thermal stress on sensitive components—has only increased as the industry has searched for Pb-free alternatives to the chosen standard, SAC305, which melts at considerably higher temperatures than the incumbent tin-lead alloys.

Surface Treatment Enabling Low-Temperature Soldering to Aluminum

07/15/2019 | Divyakant Kadiwala, Averatek Corporation
An increasingly popular method to meet the need for lower cost circuitry is the use of aluminum on polyester (Al-PET) substrates. This material is gaining popularity and has found wide use in RFID tags, low-cost LED lighting, and other single-layer circuits. However, both aluminum and PET have their own constraints and require special processing to make finished circuits.

Failures and Reliability in Soldering

07/09/2019 | Michael Gouldsmith and Zen Lee, Thermaltronics
The definition of failure is "the lack of success in doing or achieving something, especially in relation to a particular activity." If the activity is concerning a soldering process, such a failure can have a downstream impact far beyond the actual solder joint. In this regard, it is first necessary to understand what constitutes a good solder joint because appearance is too often deemed a success.



Copyright © 2019 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.