IPC Webinar Review: Tariff Tensions Influence Electronics Supply Chain
April 11, 2025 | I-Connect007 Editorial TeamEstimated reading time: 2 minutes

IPC continued its important discussion of the operational impact of new tariff policies on the electronics manufacturing supply chain by addressing a primarily European audience in a webinar on Thursday, April 10. This webinar focused on critical developments in global trade policy affecting Europe, and how trade tensions are influencing strategic decisions across the electronics supply chain.
Alison James, senior director of European government relations, hosted the event. Speakers included Jose Maria Vinals and Milla Kasulke of Squire Patton Boggs, and Raphael Beaujeu of DECISION. They highlighted IPC’s region-specific approach to government relations and efforts in Europe to strengthen the electronics industrial base and align regulatory frameworks to reduce burdens on business operations.
In collaboration with numerous European companies and industry associations, IPC has launched a call to action, urging EU institutions and member states to support policies and funding that encourage business investment to revitalize regional electronics manufacturing, enhance economic competitiveness, drive innovation, and improve national security.
Much time was spent delving into the complex and rapidly changing tariff environment driven by the U.S., which announced trade policies in early April that have included a 10% universal import tariff. On April 9, it was announced that the reciprocal tariffs above 10%, which had gone into effect that morning, would be paused for 90 days for all countries except China, which was to be increased to 125% plus an additional 20% tariff previously imposed.
Though driven by multiple U.S. objectives aimed at increasing trade equity for the U.S. and increasing federal revenue, the U.S. presidential administration is also looking at domestic manufacturing incentives. The scope of these tariffs—especially their application to electronics components and inputs—has raised great concern about global supply chain disruption and cost escalation beyond even pandemic-era disruptions.
The webinar speakers addressed Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum and warned of possible expansion to copper and derivative products—materials essential in electronics and PCB production. They also flagged increased administrative and compliance burdens for companies due to origin tracing and tariff classification rules.
Opportunities do exist for businesses to adjust their operations. Strategies such as tariff engineering, contract renegotiation, and supply chain relocation are being explored to mitigate risk. Some companies are examining joint ventures and mergers in tariff-favorable regions to maintain access to the U.S. market.
On Wednesday, the European Union paused its retaliatory tariffs toward the U.S. and is aiming instead to negotiate with the Trump administration for a zero-for-zero tariff agreement. EU regulators have also delayed or adjusted certain environmental, social, governance (ESG)-related regulations to maintain a flexible stance in trade discussions. At the same time, new enforcement tools like anti-coercion mechanisms and restrictions on public procurement are being prepared by European leaders should negotiations fail.
As the Thursday webinar concluded, presenters stressed the dual impact of tariffs: a direct hit to electronics exports and an indirect blow via reduced demand in downstream industries. Companies are encouraged to engage with legal and trade advisors to navigate the current landscape, optimize supply chains, and prepare for a shifting regulatory future.
A similar IPC webinar took place April 3, targeting a mostly U.S.-based audience, featuring Kasulke as the main presenter.
Additional IPC resources to help navigate the ongoing changes in trade policy include:
Suggested Items
I-Connect007 Editor’s Choice: Five Must-Reads for the Week
05/09/2025 | Andy Shaughnessy, Design007 MagazineTrade show season is wrapping up as we head into summer. Where has the time gone? I hope you all get the chance to take a vacation this year, because I know you’ve earned one. Speaking of which, when was my last vacay? If I can’t remember, it’s probably time for one. It’s been a busy week in electronics, with fallout from the back-and-forth on tariffs taking up most of the oxygen in the room. We have quite an assortment of articles and columns for you in this installment of Must-Reads. See you next time.
Localized Automation Becomes a Tariff Storm Safe Haven, but U.S. Smart Factory Build-Out Costs Far Exceed China’s
05/09/2025 | TrendForceTrendForce’s latest “Human-Machine Technology Report” points out that although the 90-day delay on the U.S. reciprocal tariffs announced by the Trump administration in early April 2025 offers temporary relief, it has already triggered lasting shifts in global manufacturing and supply chain strategies.
Voices of the Industry: Alpha Circuit
05/06/2025 | Marcy LaRont, PCB007 MagazinePrashant Patel, founder and president of Alpha Circuit, takes a pragmatic approach to doing business: “Commerce always wins out,” he says. How will potential tariffs and shifts in the economy affect PCB manufacturing? Prashant offers sound advice.
The Government Circuit: Trump’s Trade War Disrupts the Electronics Ecosystem
05/06/2025 | Chris Mitchell -- Column: The Government CircuitThere is certainly no shortage of work to be done in the IPC Government Relations department, as the U.S. waged a tariff campaign on practically every industrial country in the world and several countries embarked on high-tech initiatives with a mix of approaches to the crucial foundations of electronics manufacturing. Indeed, the breadth and speed of U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariff campaign continues to be a serious challenge for our industry.
TV Brands May Pass U.S. Tariff Costs to Consumers; 2025 Shipments Expected to Drop 0.7%
04/30/2025 | TrendForceTrendForce’s latest research indicates that U.S. reciprocal tariffs are likely to drive TV brands to pass rising costs onto consumers through higher retail prices in the second half of 2025, further weakening consumer spending momentum.