-
- News
- Books
Featured Books
- I-Connect007 Magazine
Latest Issues
Current Issue
Beyond the Rulebook
What happens when the rule book is no longer useful, or worse, was never written in the first place? In today’s fast-moving electronics landscape, we’re increasingly asked to design and build what has no precedent, no proven path, and no tidy checklist to follow. This is where “Design for Invention” begins.
March Madness
From the growing role of AI in design tools to the challenge of managing cumulative tolerances, these articles in this issue examine the technical details, design choices, and manufacturing considerations that determine whether a board works as intended.
Looking Forward to APEX EXPO 2026
I-Connect007 Magazine previews APEX EXPO 2026, covering everything from the show floor to the technical conference. For PCB designers, we move past the dreaded auto-router and spotlight AI design tools that actually matter.
- Articles
- Columns
- Links
- Media kit
||| MENU - I-Connect007 Magazine
Estimated reading time: 1 minute
Temporary Process Change
Change is Good
Change is a given. While this adage may be quite true and normally a good thing, it can cause havoc in the documentation system of a printed circuit operation. To be successful, there must be a formal methodology to handle process change.
Without change, improvement stagnates and complacency sets in. Change is good, but the operative word is controlled change relative to the complex processes involved in producing a PCB. Many companies implement change on the fly, without any formal evaluation or approval process in place. This tends to not only be ineffective, but also to guarantee a finding with any customer or ISO auditor. The key to successfully navigating procedural change is to develop a robust temporary process change (TPC) program.
Process Overview
When crafting the program, the first thing to flesh out is the function that will serve as the watchdog of the system, which is the first mission-critical aspect of a TPC program. Creativity must certainly be fostered, while at the same time guarding against changes that could have a detrimental effect on the process. Redundant TPCs must also be avoided as there is no need to expend resources on a method that has been proven unsuccessful in the past. I would make a strong argument for process engineering to manage the system, but each shop is different; however, my only caveat would be to have a single entity overseeing the process. I would also highly recommend making this a standalone procedure/work instruction. Read the full column here.Editor's Note: This column originally appeared in the September 2013 issue of The PCB Magazine.
More Columns from The Right Approach
The Right Approach: Reflections on 50 Years in the Business, Part 3The Right Approach: Reflections on 50 Years in the Business, Part 2
The Right Approach: Reflections on 50 Years in the Business, Part 1
The Right Approach: The Uncomfortable Truth Behind Government Shutdowns
The Right Approach: Electro-Tek—A Williams Family Legacy, Part 2
The Right Approach: Electro-Tek—A Williams Family Legacy, Part 1
The Right Approach: Get Ready for ISO 9001 Version 6
The Right Approach: ‘Twas the Night Before Christmas (Harley-style)