-
- News
- Books
Featured Books
- pcb007 Magazine
Latest Issues
Current IssueAdditive Manufacturing
In this month’s issue, we explore additive manufacturing technology for the PCB fabricator: where it stands today, the true benefits, and where it seems to be headed.
The Growing Industry
In this issue of PCB007 Magazine, we talk with leading economic experts, advocacy specialists in Washington, D.C., and PCB company leadership to get a well-rounded picture of what’s happening in the industry today. Don’t miss it.
The Sustainability Issue
Sustainability is one of the most widely used terms in business today, especially for electronics and manufacturing but what does it mean to you? We explore the environmental, business, and economic impacts.
- Articles
- Columns
Search Console
- Links
- Events
||| MENU - pcb007 Magazine
Happy’s Essential Skills: Roadmapping Essentials
August 17, 2016 | Happy HoldenEstimated reading time: 17 minutes
This is usually driven (in a technology roadmap) by evaluating the relative business value and the technical complexity, plotting the results in a quadrant graph of some kind. It is critical here that the stakeholders are engaged in the collection of the data points and they are keenly aware of what they are scoring. At the end of the day, what we are doing here is identifying what is feasible and what has the highest business value. I know, I know—this sounds obvious, but you would be astonished by how frequently this does not occur.
Approaches vary, but a common model employs the notion of product generations with features projected by extrapolating recent market trends. An alternative approach relies on a visionary or idealistic future scenario created through a brainstorming process.
4b. Discover the optimum sequence.
The fourth stage enumerates barriers to reaching the goals and targets defined in stage two by characterizing the technical (and infrastructure) gaps and hurdles impeding progress. Remarkably, this often proves the most difficult of all stages because of the high level of uncertainty and wide range of strongly held opinions. At this point the technology drivers and their targets are specified and the technology alternatives that can satisfy those targets should be specified. For each of the alternatives a timeline should be estimated for how it will mature with respect to the technology driver targets.
The time factor can be adapted or made suitable for the particular situation. The time horizons for e-commerce and software-related sectors are usually short. Other distinctions can be made on scale and intervals.
5. Develop the Roadmap
Finally, concrete plans addressing each gap form the fifth stage. This usually translates into a list of research and development priorities. Technical strategies and timetables represent the consensus of the planners. Do not underestimate this task. After all the hard work put into an exercise like this, the last thing we need to do is to confuse our stakeholders with mind-numbing detail. Yes, we need this for ourselves to exhaust any possibility that we have missed something. And to ensure we haven’t overlooked the obvious—not sure who said this but, “when something is obvious, it may be obviously wrong.”
Because the alternatives may differ in costs, timeline, etc., a selection has to be made of the alternatives. These will be the alternatives to be pursued. In this step a lot of trade-offs have to be made between different alternatives for different targets: for example, performance over costs and even target over target. The technology roadmap report consists of five parts:
- The identification and description of each technology area
- Critical factors in the roadmap
- Unaddressed areas
- Implementation recommendations
- Technical recommendations
Phase 3: Follow-up activity phase
This is the moment when the roadmap must be critiqued, validated and hopefully accepted by the group that will be involved in any implementation. For this, a plan needs to be developed using the technology roadmap. Next, there must be a periodical review and update point, because the needs from the participants and the technologies are evolving.
Roadmapping Risks
As with any powerful tool, the potential for misuse, or even abuse, leads to abundant dangers and can render a technology roadmap useless, or worse. Risks exist at all stages of roadmapping. The rest of this paper analyses key roadmapping risks with techniques to identify and mitigate each risk.
Expert Bias
Expert opinions and market data form the foundation from which the roadmaps emerge. Obviously, bias on the part of experts or inaccurate input data results in a weak foundation. Not surprisingly, the experts who participate in roadmapping incorporate their personal and professional biases into the process. These experts, rightly, champion projects and positions they believe in, often with explicit employer support. When properly balanced by alternative points of view, this type of bias facilitates the advance of new ideas. On the other hand, if a particular camp represents disproportionate or especially persuasive representation, the group may overlook viable alternative perspectives.
One strategy to limit undue influence of expert bias relies on open and explicit disclosure of each participant’s business and career interests. In addition, roadmap organizers must continually monitor the balance among various initiatives, causes, and stakeholders represented within the group, adding participants as needed to insure each point of view has a voice.
Misleading Market Data
Recognition of genuine trends requires the perspective of time and distance. Confusion between short-lived fads and sustained trends often obfuscate reality. For example: the iPad, real trend or passing fashion? Time will tell. Time did tell! Because the iPad was not predicted in the mobile phone roadmap, Nokia, Samsung, Motorola and RIM were not working on such a product and found themselves woefully behind when it was clear that the iPad was not a fad. However, roadmapping requires interpretation of contemporary market activity in terms of sustained trends. A badly skewed roadmap results when market hype supersedes real trends.
To guard against such uncertainty, the roadmap must explicitly acknowledge the uncertainty of market forecasts. One helpful approach employs future scenario planning in which the team describes alternative, possible futures. Recognizing that each future scenario represents a real potential outcome can add balance and limit the impact of transient market patterns on the roadmap.
Unforeseen Innovations
While bonafide market trends provide reasonable predictions of future development, they cannot predict breakthroughs and/or revolutionary innovations. Just as driving down the highway while watching only the rearview mirror increases risk of a collision, blind reliance on recent market trends results in a roadmap that may suddenly become outdated (and irrelevant). Future scenario planning also mitigates the impact of the unforeseen innovation. While no collection of alternative future scenarios can predict a breakthrough, explicit inclusion of forecast uncertainty results in a more robust roadmap better able to encompass unforeseen developments.
Inappropriate Aspirations
Appropriate aspirations, in response to the second essential roadmapping question (where do we want to be?), create the motivational and empowering focus of the roadmap. Overly conservative or overly ambitious aspirations sap the life out of a roadmap and demotivate the participants. Moreover, some aspirations appear so utopian or naive that they become totally unrealistic.
If left unchecked, inappropriate aspirations render the roadmap a worthless waste of time. Conversely, a good set of aspirations promotes great outcomes as President John Kennedy did in 1961 when he established the goal to send a man to the moon and back by the end of the decade. Assess proposed aspirations by getting a feel for their ability to motivate and excite. No excitement means more work to do. Too much excitement likely means either naiveté or unrealistic expectations.
We Don’t Know What We Don’t Know
The mechanistic approach implied by Figure 4 ignores the inevitable uncertainty in forecasting. We don’t know what we don’t know, so how can we correctly identify the barriers between today’s situation and tomorrow’s aspirations? Which paths lead to dead-ends and which paths enable products not yet imagined? The authors agree with Carl von Clausewitz: “No battle plan survives first contact with the enemy.” The benefit of planning, fortunately, lies not in accuracy, but in the insight and understanding gained through the process.
Similarly, no (useful) roadmap survives first contact with the future. Nevertheless, a useful roadmap engenders insight and understanding when viewed as a process.
Roadmap as Product
A related risk lies in focusing on the technology roadmap as a product, rather than as a process. Viewing the roadmap as a product distorts the tool’s greatest value: insight and understanding resulting from exploring alternative futures.
When viewing the roadmap as a process, periodic reassessments and revisions attract and retain the interest of participants. Revisions based on new information implement easily with clearly articulated alternative scenarios and explicit linkages between scenarios and roadmap elements. As a result, the roadmap becomes increasingly relevant instead of suddenly outdated.
Scheduled Development
Innately irregular, creativity and innovation resist scheduling. Application of additional resources accelerates progress in some situations but often diminishes creative output. By analogy, some seem to think that nine women can make a baby in one month. Realistic timetables avoid scheduling uncertainties and critical paths that require true innovation. Prioritizing research and development conforms to the intention and power of technical roadmapping.
Stifle Innovation
Perhaps the subtlest danger embedded in technology roadmapping lies in the potential to stifle innovation. In effect the roadmap often blocks revolutionary innovations, particularly when creative ideas deviating from the roadmap’s strategic plan receive no resource allocation, the roadmap ultimately quashes breakthroughs.
With a thorough understanding of the roles of uncertainty and unforeseeable developments expressed in alternative future scenarios, business managers, marketing groups and researchers quickly grasp the likely significance of off-roadmap events.
Rather than stifle creativity, thoughtfully developed and maintained technical roadmaps stimulate innovation that either supports the vision expressed in the roadmap or challenges the assumptions and scenarios that underlie the roadmap.
Conclusions
Many industries—including the electronics industry—recognize value and benefits in technical roadmapping. However, misuse leads to abundant dangers and can render a technology roadmap useless, or worse. Good roadmaps embrace uncertainty, exploiting apparent weakness to derive maximum insight and understanding. Good roadmaps also motivate and inspire creativity. The Technology Roadmapping Handbook from the University of Leipzig[2] is a useful document to download as a roadmapping reference.
References
- Wikipedia: technical roadmapping.
- Technology Roadmapping Handbook, International SEPT Program, University of Leipzig.
Happy Holden has worked in printed circuit technology since 1970 with Hewlett-Packard, NanYa/Westwood, Merix, Foxconn and Gentex. He is the co-editor, with Clyde Coombs, of the recently published Printed Circuit Handbook, 7th Ed. To contact Holden, click here.
Page 3 of 3Suggested Items
IPC APEX EXPO Retrospective: The Founders Look Back
05/30/2024 | Marcy LaRont, PCB007 MagazineIPC APEX EXPO 2024 will soon feel like a distant memory, and by all accounts, it was a good show with an impressive display of technical knowledge. During the show, I visited with industry icons and IPC Hall of Fame recipients Dan Feinberg and Gene Weiner, who were among the original visionaries and founders of what became APEX EXPO. These individuals took me on a funny and engaging historic journey and a glimpse into how we arrived today.
Real Time with… IPC APEX EXPO 2024: Electrification of Automobiles: Challenges and Solutions
05/30/2024 | Real Time with...IPC APEX EXPOGrace O'Malley, VP of technical operations for iNEMI, shines a light on the electrification of automobiles, the need for industry alignment, standardization, and collaboration to tackle challenges. She mentions issues from a recent workshop, changing use cycles, longer vehicle lifespan, and the role of OEMs and the supply chain. Grace also highlights the importance of collaboration and appreciates the opportunity to work with industry leaders.
Remembering Michael Gasch: Europe's Foremost PCB Industry Expert
05/30/2024 | EIPCKnown and appreciated far beyond the European electronics industry, Michael Gasch initially worked at DYNAMIT NOBEL AG from 1971 to 1988, including 11 years as sales manager for electrical melting products in Troisdorf and 6 years as managing director and regional representative for Southeast Asia at DYNAMIT NOBEL Singapore. B
AIM Solder Joins International Electronics Manufacturing Initiative (iNEMI)
05/29/2024 | AIMAIM Solder, a leading global manufacturer of solder assembly materials, is proud to announce its membership with the International Electronics Manufacturing Initiative (iNEMI).
Micron Expands Workforce Development Collaborations to Meet Future Semiconductor Job Demand
05/29/2024 | MicronMicron Technology, Inc., one of the world’s largest semiconductor companies and the only U.S.-based manufacturer of memory, today announced a strategic expansion in workforce development initiatives to diversify the semiconductor workforce and build a robust talent pipeline through education and career reentry initiatives.