Trouble in Your Tank: Implementing Direct Metallization in Advanced Substrate Packaging
It’s Only Common Sense: Storytelling That Sells—Stop Pitching, Start Painting Pictures
The Right Approach: Get Ready for ISO 9001 Version 6
Flex Circuit Shielding Design Options
October 22, 2015 | Mike Morando, PFC Flexible CircuitsEstimated reading time: 4 minutes
In December of 2014 I visited the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) conference in Chicago. As you can imagine, MRI and X-ray equipment filled the convention center. Attending the show gave me the opportunity to speak to radiology designers. Since the equipment they are designing “radiates” with waves of electrons, the underlying electronics have to be super protected for fear of interference. When discussing flex designs, EMI and shielding circuits is the number one design concern.
Shielding may not be your company’s number one design concern when thinking about your interconnect designs. But if you have to shield circuits for EMI, then you will need to depend on your supplier to assist you with their favorite shielding technique and experience.
The Basics: What is EMI and Do Flex Circuits Radiate?
Electromagnetic radiation that adversely affects circuit performance is generally termed EMI, or electromagnetic interference. Many types of electronic circuits are susceptible to EMI and must be shielded to ensure proper performance. Conversely, emissions radiating from sources inside electronic equipment may threaten circuits within the same or nearby equipment.
To protect the performance integrity of electronic equipment, electromagnetic emissions from commercial equipment must not exceed levels set by the FCC, VDE and other organizations. Shielding requirements for commercial electronics generally range from 40–60 dB. Finding a system's overall shielding needs involves determining the radiated emission spectrum of the equipment, and the specifications the unit must meet (e.g. FCC Part 15).
And yes, flex circuits will radiate.
What is EMI shielding?
Shielding is the use of conductive materials to reduce radiated EMI by reflection and/or absorption. Shielding can be applied to different areas of the electronic package from equipment enclosures to individual circuit boards or devices. Effective placement of shielding causes an abrupt discontinuity in the path of electromagnetic waves. At low frequencies, most of the wave energy is reflected from a shield's surface, while a smaller portion is absorbed. At higher frequencies, absorption generally predominates. Shielding performance is a function of the properties and configuration of the shielding material (conductivity, permeability and thickness), the frequency, and distance from the source to the shield.
Flex shielding methodology
Shielding a flex circuit can be accomplished through multiple methods. Shields are designed and used for EMI and ESD considerations as well as signal integrity methodology. Here are some common and not so common practices for shielding a flex circuit.
- Copper-clad—adding additional copper layers to the circuit—the least flexible method.
Figure 1: Very thick outside copper layers supressing radiation.
- Copper cross hatch—adding additional copper layers and etching them to create a cross hatch design which allows more flexibility than standard copper-clad layers. Benefit: More flexible than pure copper layers.
Figure 2: Outer layer cross hatch for EMI suppression. Benefit: More flexible than pure copper layers.
- Silver paste/epoxy—achieved by applying a conductive paste over the outer layers of a circuit. The Kapton® covercoat has holes. Silver paste is sprayed on the covercoat and the silver paste drains down the holes and makes contact with the copper ground inside the circuit. This technique allows a slightly more flexible design than the copper-clad solution mentioned above. Benefit: More flexible. Downside: higher cost.Page 1 of 2
Share on:
Testimonial
"The I-Connect007 team is outstanding—kind, responsive, and a true marketing partner. Their design team created fresh, eye-catching ads, and their editorial support polished our content to let our brand shine. Thank you all! "
Sweeney Ng - CEE PCBSuggested Items
Trouble in Your Tank: Implementing Direct Metallization in Advanced Substrate Packaging
09/15/2025 | Michael Carano -- Column: Trouble in Your TankDirect metallization systems based on conductive graphite are gaining popularity throughout the world. The environmental and productivity gains achievable with this process are outstanding. Direct metallization reduces the costs of compliance, waste treatment, and legal issues related to chemical exposure. A graphite-based direct plate system has been devised to address these needs.
Closing the Loop on PCB Etching Waste
09/09/2025 | Shawn Stone, IECAs the PCB industry continues its push toward greener, more cost-efficient operations, Sigma Engineering’s Mecer System offers a comprehensive solution to two of the industry’s most persistent pain points: etchant consumption and rinse water waste. Designed as a modular, fully automated platform, the Mecer System regenerates spent copper etchants—both alkaline and acidic—and simultaneously recycles rinse water, transforming a traditionally linear chemical process into a closed-loop system.
Driving Innovation: Depth Routing Processes—Achieving Unparalleled Precision in Complex PCBs
09/08/2025 | Kurt Palmer -- Column: Driving InnovationIn PCB manufacturing, the demand for increasingly complex and miniaturized designs continually pushes the boundaries of traditional fabrication methods, including depth routing. Success in these applications demands not only on robust machinery but also sophisticated control functions. PCB manufacturers rely on advanced machine features and process methodologies to meet their precise depth routing goals. Here, I’ll explore some crucial functions that empower manufacturers to master complex depth routing challenges.
Trouble in Your Tank: Minimizing Small-via Defects for High-reliability PCBs
08/27/2025 | Michael Carano -- Column: Trouble in Your TankTo quote the comedian Stephen Wright, “If at first you don’t succeed, then skydiving is not for you.” That can be the battle cry when you find that only small-diameter vias are exhibiting voids. Why are small holes more prone to voids than larger vias when processed through electroless copper? There are several reasons.
The Government Circuit: Navigating New Trade Headwinds and New Partnerships
08/25/2025 | Chris Mitchell -- Column: The Government CircuitAs global trade winds continue to howl, the electronics manufacturing industry finds itself at a critical juncture. After months of warnings, the U.S. Government has implemented a broad array of tariff increases, with fresh duties hitting copper-based products, semiconductors, and imports from many nations. On the positive side, tentative trade agreements with Europe, China, Japan, and other nations are providing at least some clarity and counterbalance.