Global Top Ten IC Design Companies Ranked by Revenue
February 27, 2019 | TrendForceEstimated reading time: 2 minutes

According to TrendForce's latest statistics, the global top ten IC design companies, ranked by revenue, have just come out, with Broadcom, Qualcomm and NVIDIA, taking first, second and third, respectively. Among the top ten, Qualcomm suffered the largest decline due to the weak smartphone demand, with its revenue dropping by 3.9%; MediaTek was likewise impacted by the unsatisfactory smartphone demand, and suffered a decline of 0.7% (in USD) in annual revenue, but only 0.1% in TWD.
TrendForce's senior industry analyst, Chia-Yang, Yao, points out that, although Qualcomm's 2018 product strategy had been rather proactive, its phone chips suffered a drop in shipments and further affected revenue performance, due to Qualcomm's having lost Apple's 2018 order for the new LTE Modems and Huawei steadily increasing its proportion of Kirin processors. In contrast, MediaTek kept on adjusting its product portfolio and cost structure, which greatly diminished their revenue decline.
Looking at the overall situation of the top ten IC design companies of 2018, we see that eight enjoyed a positive growth in annual revenue compared to 2017. This was mainly the result of the steady growth momentum in end markets such as telecom infrastructure, data center and TVs; acquisitions served as secondary reasons for the improvement in revenue. Companies that benefitted from market growth momentum include Broadcom, NVIDIA, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), Xilinx, Novatek and Realtek; those that benefitted from acquisitions include Marvell and Dialog Semiconductor.
AMD performed quite excellently in 2018, second only to NVIDIA in terms of growth. The main reason for this was the brilliant performance of AMD's Computing and Graphics products, with a revenue of US$4.13 billion, and a growth of 38.6%. This was thanks to AMD's gradual adoption of the 7nm process for its Computing and Graphics products, granting them a successful entry into the server market.
However, it must be noted that a large number of companies performed lower than originally predicted by market forecasts in 4Q18, including companies such as NVIDIA, Marvell and Dialog Semiconductor, whose finanical forecasts corrected down. In the case of NVIDIA, at least 50% of its revenue derives from games, but games have slid greatly in revenue last season, causing total revenue performance not to go as others expected in 2018. This also shows that NVIDIA's gaming graphic card inventory levels have yet to be completely cleared, and will probably still require one or two seasons for clearance and a chance to return to normal operating performances. Nevertheless, it snatched the crown among the top ten IC design companies in growth.
Looking ahead at 2019, Chia-Yang, Yao predicts that the top ten IC design companies will be dragged down by numerous factors, such as the continual decline in smartphone growth, and the fact that 5G or foldable smartphones will merely remain hot-topics, with shipments and penetration rates realized in limited quantities. Huawei is still taking a rather aggressive stance in the smartphone market, which is bound to limit the market performances of other OEMs, and will prove to be disadvantageous to Qualcomm's and MediaTek's market performances in 2019.
Growth on the server side is predicted to drop below that of 2018, mainly due to all the big CSP companies' data centers coming into place, gradually reducing their need for servers. Furthermore, demand in the global car market may become suppressed under Trump's promotion of protectionist policies and the US-China trade dispute. Thus we hold a comparatively cautious view on the 2019 revenue performance of the top ten IC design companies.
Suggested Items
Electronic System Design Industry Posts $4.9 Billion in Revenue in Q4 2024
04/15/2025 | SEMIElectronic System Design (ESD) industry revenue increased 11% to $4,927.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2024 from the $4440.9 million reported in the fourth quarter of 2023, the ESD Alliance, a SEMI Technology Community, announced in its latest Electronic Design Market Data (EDMD) report.
Würth Elektronik ICS at PCIM Europe 2025
04/14/2025 | Wurth ElektronikWürth Elektronik ICS will be exhibiting at PCIM in Nuremberg from 6 to 8 May 2025. The specialist for PCB connection solutions in the high-current sector and inventor of Powerelements will be focussing on power electronics at exhibition stand 337 in hall A6.
EDA Tools and RF Design Techniques
04/14/2025 | Andy Shaughnessy, Design007 MagazineHigh-speed PCB design is complex enough, but RF design can be a whole new ball game. RF designers have to contend with tuning and other ideas that traditional PCB designers don’t have to worry about, as well as crosstalk, parasitic capacitance, and material limitations. Most PCB design tool companies now offer RF design options, so designers no longer have to use pureplay RF design tools for anything but the most cutting-edge designs. Cadence Design Systems expanded its RF EDA offerings by acquiring the RF software company AWR a few years ago. We asked David Vye, product management director at Cadence, to share his thoughts on EDA software, RF design, and what new RF designers and engineers need to understand.
Avnet Technology Links STMicroelectronics’ STM32 Microcontrollers
04/11/2025 | AvnetDesign engineers who struggle with chip down design will now be able to quickly prototype and deploy their projects based on STM32 series of microcontrollers, specifically the STM32F7 and STM32N6 series.
The Key to First-pass Success in PCB Design
04/10/2025 | Gerry Partida, Summit InterconnectIn the dynamic world of PCB manufacturing, achieving first-pass success hinges on more than just cutting-edge equipment and skilled teams. At Summit Interconnect, we have seen countless successful launches of advanced HDI designs that can be traced directly to engagement between designers and fabricators early in the design phase. Unfortunately, collaboration in the PCB industry often begins only after problems arise—such as field failures, assembly fallout, or low fabrication yields. This reactive approach is the wrong starting point for collaboration.