"Tweezer Clock" May Help Tell Time More Precisely
December 24, 2019 | CaltechEstimated reading time: 3 minutes

Atomic clocks are used around the world to precisely tell time. Each "tick" of the clock depends on atomic vibrations and their effects on surrounding electromagnetic fields. Standard atomic clocks in use today, based on the atom cesium, tell time by counting radio frequencies. These clocks can measure time to a precision of one second per every hundreds of millions of years. Newer atomic clocks that measure optical frequencies of light are even more precise, and may eventually replace the radio-based ones.
Now, researchers at Caltech and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), which is managed by Caltech for NASA, have come up with a new design for an optical atomic clock that holds promise to be the most accurate and precise yet (accuracy refers to the ability of the clock to correctly pin down the time, and precision refers to its ability to tell time in fine detail). Nicknamed the "tweezer clock," it employs technology in which so-called laser tweezers are used to manipulate individual atoms.
"One of the goals of physicists is to be able to tell time as precisely as possible," says Manuel Endres, an assistant professor of physics at Caltech who led a new paper describing the results in the journal Physical Review X. Endres explains that while the ultra-precise clocks may not be needed for everyday purposes of counting time, they could lead to advances in fundamental physics research as well as new technologies that are yet to be imagined.
The new clock design builds upon two types of optical atomic clocks already in use. The first type is based on a single trapped charged atom, or ion, while the second uses thousands of neutral atoms trapped in what is called an optical lattice. In the trapped-ion approach, only one atom (the ion) needs to be precisely isolated and controlled, and this improves the accuracy of the clock. On the other hand, the optical lattice approach benefits from having multiple atoms—with more atoms there are fewer uncertainties that arise due to random quantum fluctuations of individual atoms.
The atomic clock design from Endres' group essentially combines the advantages of the two designs, reaping the benefits of both. Instead of using a collection of many atoms, as is the case with the optical lattice approach, the new design uses 40 atoms—and those atoms are precisely controlled with laser tweezers. In this regard, the new design benefits not only from having multiple atoms but also by allowing researchers to control those atoms.
"This approach bridges two branches of physics—single-atom control techniques and precision measurement," says Ivaylo Madjarov, a Caltech graduate student and lead author of the new study. "We're pioneering a new platform for atomic clocks."
Madjarov explains that, in general, the atoms in atomic clocks act like tuning forks to help stabilize the electromagnetic frequencies, or laser light. "The oscillations of our laser light act as a pendulum that counts the passage of time. The atoms are a very reliable reference that makes sure that pendulum swings at a constant rate."
The team says that the new system is ideally suited for future research into quantum technologies. The atoms in these systems can become entangled, or globally connected, and this entangled state can further stabilize the clock. "Our approach can also build a bridge to quantum computation and communication architectures," says Endres. "By merging different techniques in physics, we've entered a new frontier."
The Physical Review X paper, titled, "An Atomic Array Optical Clock with Single-Atom Readout," is funded by the National Science Foundation and the Air Force Office of Scientific Research. Other authors include: Alexandre Cooper-Roy, formerly of Caltech and now at the University of Waterloo; Adam Shaw, Jacob Covey, and Tai Hyun Yoon of Caltech; and Vladimir Schkolnik, and Jason Williams of JPL.
Suggested Items
DownStream Acquisition Fits Siemens’ ‘Left-Shift’ Model
06/26/2025 | Andy Shaughnessy, I-Connect007I recently spoke to DownStream Technologies founder Joe Clark about the company’s acquisition by Siemens. We were later joined by A.J. Incorvaia, Siemens’ senior VP of electronic board systems. Joe discussed how he, Rick Almeida, and Ken Tepper launched the company in the months after 9/11 and how the acquisition came about. A.J. provides some background on the acquisition and explains why the companies’ tools are complementary.
Elementary Mr. Watson: Retro Routers vs. Modern Boards—The Silent Struggle on Your Screen
06/26/2025 | John Watson -- Column: Elementary, Mr. WatsonThere's a story about a young woman preparing a holiday ham. Before putting it in the pan, she cuts off the ends. When asked why, she shrugs and says, "That's how my mom always did it." She asks her mother, who gives the same answer. Eventually, the question reaches Grandma, who laughs and says, "Oh, I only cut the ends off because my pan was too small." This story is a powerful analogy for how many PCB designers approach routing today.
Siemens Turbocharges Semiconductor and PCB Design Portfolio with Generative and Agentic AI
06/24/2025 | SiemensAt the 2025 Design Automation Conference, Siemens Digital Industries Software today unveiled its AI-enhanced toolset for the EDA design flow.
Cadence AI Autorouter May Transform the Landscape
06/19/2025 | Andy Shaughnessy, Design007 MagazinePatrick Davis, product management director with Cadence Design Systems, discusses advancements in autorouting technology, including AI. He emphasizes a holistic approach that enhances placement and power distribution before routing. He points out that younger engineers seem more likely to embrace autorouting, while the veteran designers are still wary of giving up too much control. Will AI help autorouters finally gain industry-wide acceptance?
Beyond Design: The Metamorphosis of the PCB Router
06/18/2025 | Barry Olney -- Column: Beyond DesignThe traditional PCB design process is often time-consuming and labor-intensive. Routing a complex PCB layout can consume up to 30% of a designer’s time, and addressing this issue is not straightforward. We have all encountered this scenario: You spend hours setting the constraints and finally hit the Go button, only to be surprised by the lack of visual appeal and the obvious flaws in the result.