IPC Update on the Latest U.S.– China Trade Announcement
June 18, 2025 | IPCEstimated reading time: 3 minutes
On June 12, the Trump Administration announced an agreement to implement the framework of the trade deal with China reached earlier in May. Reports indicate the following high-level terms:
- A 55% combined tariff on imports from China
- 10% “reciprocal” tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA),
- 20% IEEPA-based fentanyl tariffs, and
- Existing Section 301 tariffs, which in many cases are 25%. This structure largely reflects the status quo as of May 14 for many electronics-related imports.
- China has reportedly agreed to resume exports of rare earth minerals for six months.
- The U.S. is reportedly open to negotiations that may ease certain semiconductor-related export controls
Of note, the legal status of the 10% and 20% IEEPA tariffs remains unresolved. The 10% “reciprocal” and 20% fentanyl-related tariffs are currently the subject of ongoing litigation. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has issued a temporary stay on a lower court’s ruling that had challenged the legality of these tariffs. The parties will be arguing before the appeals court on an expedited schedule this summer, with a decision expected sometime after July. The IEEPA tariffs remain in effect as that legal challenge proceeds.
Chris Mitchell, Vice President of Global Relations and advocacy for the association had this to say, “IPC, the global electronics trade association, welcomes the announcement by United States and China on a deal to implement a framework for resolving trade tensions. We encourage the administration to continue reducing and eliminating harmful tariffs and to strengthen the domestic electronics supply chain through the development of a national electronics manufacturing strategy that builds critical capabilities and capacity through investment acceleration, smart tax incentives, and targeted national security investments.”
IPC members should continue to comply with all U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) regulations and pay all applicable duties. At the same time, members should work with their trade counsel or customs broker to understand relevant customs procedures and deadlines. If these tariffs are overturned at a later date, customs experts advise that companies seeking refunds may still be bound by the protest and filing deadlines outlined in CBP regulations.
Likewise, IPC members should be wary of suppliers who offer deals that seem too good to be true, for example delivered duty paid (DDP) goods at suspiciously low prices. If your supplier commits fraud, you are liable as the importer. The administration has publicly committed to stringent customs enforcement and written harsh penalties into tariff executive orders.
As the global trade association for the electronics manufacturing industry, IPC continues to closely monitor these developments and voice the concerns of industry to policymakers on Capitol Hill and within the Administration. IPC calls for the elimination of harmful tariffs and for the development and implementation of a proactive national electronics manufacturing strategy that incentivizes the revitalization of domestic electronics capabilities through smart incentives and investments including:
Unleash Investment in Electronics Industry
- Pass H.R. 3597 – the Protecting Circuit Boards and Substrates Act
- Extend and optimize 48D Advanced Manufacturing Credit to incentivize domestic substrate, PCB, and PCBA manufacturing
Secure the National Defense Supply Chain
- Restore and bolster funding by $1B under the Defense Production Act for PCB and advanced packaging manufacturing in the United States.
- Specify PCB and PCBA manufacturing as covered technology categories to be prioritized by supply chain investments including through the Office of Strategic Capital.
- Boost the demand signal for domestic substrates by authorizing the stockpiling of U.S.-made substrates
Build Talent Pipelines and Career Pathways
- Pass Workforce Pell and prioritize funding for industry-recognized workforce training
- Fully fund and promote the widespread adoption of apprenticeship for electronics manufacturing careers
IPC will continue to engage with policymakers and legal experts, providing members with timely updates as more information becomes available. For questions or to share input on your company’s needs, please contact IPC’s government relations team at Advocacy@ipc.org.
Testimonial
"Your magazines are a great platform for people to exchange knowledge. Thank you for the work that you do."
Simon Khesin - Schmoll MaschinenSuggested Items
After IEEPA: What Electronics Companies Should Know About Tariff Refund Strategies and Section 122
02/26/2026 | I-Connect007 Editorial TeamThe U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision striking down tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) opens the door to potential refunds for electronics companies and signals a rapid pivot to alternative trade statutes, setting the stage for a volatile 150-day period that could significantly affect global electronics supply chains. Trade and electronics industry leaders gathered for a webinar hosted by the Global Electronics Association on Feb. 24 to learn more about the landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision.
Electronics Industry Members Encouraged to Respond Immediately to Tariff Survey
02/24/2026 | I-Connect007 Editorial TeamThe Global Electronics Association is seeking immediate input from the electronics industry on how U.S. tariffs are affecting imported inputs to electronics manufacturing and assembly, including equipment, parts, components, and sub-assemblies. The survey was announced during a webinar, “Supreme Court Strikes IEEPA Tariffs: What It Means for Electronics,” hosted by the Association on Feb. 24.
Electronics Trade in a Persistent Tariff Environment
02/24/2026 | Thiago Guimaraes, Global Electronics AssociationTariffs affecting the electronics sector were largely still in place at the end of 2025, even as the pace of new announcements slowed, and several electronics-relevant investigations and legal questions pushed key decisions into 2026. For companies operating global electronics supply chains, tariffs are no longer a short-term disruption; they are part of the operating environment. The costs facing electronics manufacturers are no longer limited to the tariff rates we see in headlines.
The Government Circuit: USMCA Review—A Crucial Opportunity to Fortify North American Electronics
12/02/2025 | Chris Mitchell -- Column: The Government CircuitAs the 2026 review of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) approaches, policymakers have a rare opportunity to reinforce a partnership that powers their shared competitiveness, resilience, and growth. That is the message that I will have the honor of delivering on behalf of the Global Electronics Association in a public hearing at the U.S. International Trade Commission in Washington on Dec. 4. We’ve also submitted our views formally to the U.S. Trade Representative, and we’ve shared our position far and wide.
Nolan’s Notes: Is Mexico the Pulse of Electronics in the Americas?
11/04/2025 | Nolan Johnson -- Column: Nolan's NotesLast year, I attended SMTA Guadalajara, where I saw the results of the Mexican investment in electronics manufacturing. The U.S. was still operating under the Biden administration, and while Mexican EMS companies had expanded capacity to support EV manufacturing, the demand dropped significantly. In my conversations at the show, the sentiment was one of patience. They knew the EV business would likely come back. However, they didn’t expect an overhaul of U.S. trade agreements and tariffs that would shift a more diversified portfolio in Mexico’s direction.