Punching Out: M&A North American PCB and EMS Deals for the First Half of 2025
The Chemical Connection: Sales Organization from a Capital Equipment Perspective
Marcy’s Musings: From Pitch to PO—The Sales Stack
Why I Finally Embraced Autorouting
July 3, 2025 | Stephen V. Chavez, Siemens EDAEstimated reading time: 1 minute
Here is a common misconception held by those who don’t fully understand the PCB layout process or how to wield today’s high-level EDA tools: "All I need to do is push the autorouter button, let the computer route all the signal traces, and get the layout 100% routed. It’s a no-brainer. Anyone can do it. It should take less than a few hours.”
Well, sure, if you’re in a hurry to check the box indicating you’re finished with the layout. But your results will look like a plate of spaghetti and most likely not function correctly, if at all, while not passing SI/EMC testing. Good luck with that mindset and methodology.
As you can see, there’s a lot of confusion about autorouting. I will discuss routing and autorouting in general terms, my initial distrust of routers, and the “a-ha” moment that changed my mind. Then, for specific autorouting techniques, I will focus primarily on the Siemens router.
Routing vs. Autorouting
Let’s start by setting the baseline for “routing” regarding signal traces. Traditional routing is done by manually connecting (routing) all signal traces from point to point, mouse click by mouse click. Then, we manually make any trace constraint modifications/adjustments as necessary to meet the design requirements. Once 100% routing is achieved, a design rule check (DRC) is performed, and all flagged errors must be addressed—after the fact. This legacy methodology is very labor-intensive and time-consuming, to say the least.
The form of routing most utilized today is “manual interactive routing,” with only a few higher-end tools possessing automation-assisted interactive routing capabilities. This manual interactive routing is a combination of human effort, along with software tool utilization, and some limited automation. The key here is that the user is manually performing and controlling each and every mouse click of the routing process, but with the addition of tool automation assisting/restricting and guiding the user along the way, and according to the constraints that were implemented.
To read the entire article, which originally appeard in the June 2025 Design007 Magazine, click here.
Share on:
Testimonial
"Advertising in PCB007 Magazine has been a great way to showcase our bare board testers to the right audience. The I-Connect007 team makes the process smooth and professional. We’re proud to be featured in such a trusted publication."
Klaus Koziol - atgSuggested Items
Beyond Design: Refining Design Constraints
07/17/2025 | Barry Olney -- Column: Beyond DesignBefore starting any project, it is crucial to develop a thorough plan that encompasses all essential requirements. This ensures that the final product not only aligns with the design concept but is also manufacturable, reliable, and meets performance expectations. High-speed PCB design requires us to not only push technological boundaries but also consider various factors related to higher frequencies, faster transition times, and increased bandwidths during the design process.
Target Condition: Are Autorouters Friend or Foe?
07/01/2025 | Kelly Dack -- Column: Target ConditionFor PCB designers, just hearing the word “autorouters” can trigger everything from eye rolls to heated debate. We all have stories—some painful, some comical—of boards gone sideways at the hands of an overzealous routing algorithm. But these tools aren’t going away, and frankly, they shouldn’t. Used wisely, they can save some project teams hours or even days. Used blindly, they can cost weeks. So, where do autorouting tools stand today, and is interactive routing the smarter path forward?
Elementary Mr. Watson: Retro Routers vs. Modern Boards—The Silent Struggle on Your Screen
06/26/2025 | John Watson -- Column: Elementary, Mr. WatsonThere's a story about a young woman preparing a holiday ham. Before putting it in the pan, she cuts off the ends. When asked why, she shrugs and says, "That's how my mom always did it." She asks her mother, who gives the same answer. Eventually, the question reaches Grandma, who laughs and says, "Oh, I only cut the ends off because my pan was too small." This story is a powerful analogy for how many PCB designers approach routing today.
Cadence AI Autorouter May Transform the Landscape
06/19/2025 | Andy Shaughnessy, Design007 MagazinePatrick Davis, product management director with Cadence Design Systems, discusses advancements in autorouting technology, including AI. He emphasizes a holistic approach that enhances placement and power distribution before routing. He points out that younger engineers seem more likely to embrace autorouting, while the veteran designers are still wary of giving up too much control. Will AI help autorouters finally gain industry-wide acceptance?
Beyond Design: The Metamorphosis of the PCB Router
06/18/2025 | Barry Olney -- Column: Beyond DesignThe traditional PCB design process is often time-consuming and labor-intensive. Routing a complex PCB layout can consume up to 30% of a designer’s time, and addressing this issue is not straightforward. We have all encountered this scenario: You spend hours setting the constraints and finally hit the Go button, only to be surprised by the lack of visual appeal and the obvious flaws in the result.