It’s Only Common Sense: Customers Capabilities—and Confidence
Marcy’s Musings: Operating Without a Rulebook
Beyond the Board: How a Diminished Supplier Base Affects Complex PCB Manufacturing Readiness in Defense
Why I Finally Embraced Autorouting
July 3, 2025 | Stephen V. Chavez, Siemens EDAEstimated reading time: 1 minute
Here is a common misconception held by those who don’t fully understand the PCB layout process or how to wield today’s high-level EDA tools: "All I need to do is push the autorouter button, let the computer route all the signal traces, and get the layout 100% routed. It’s a no-brainer. Anyone can do it. It should take less than a few hours.”
Well, sure, if you’re in a hurry to check the box indicating you’re finished with the layout. But your results will look like a plate of spaghetti and most likely not function correctly, if at all, while not passing SI/EMC testing. Good luck with that mindset and methodology.
As you can see, there’s a lot of confusion about autorouting. I will discuss routing and autorouting in general terms, my initial distrust of routers, and the “a-ha” moment that changed my mind. Then, for specific autorouting techniques, I will focus primarily on the Siemens router.
Routing vs. Autorouting
Let’s start by setting the baseline for “routing” regarding signal traces. Traditional routing is done by manually connecting (routing) all signal traces from point to point, mouse click by mouse click. Then, we manually make any trace constraint modifications/adjustments as necessary to meet the design requirements. Once 100% routing is achieved, a design rule check (DRC) is performed, and all flagged errors must be addressed—after the fact. This legacy methodology is very labor-intensive and time-consuming, to say the least.
The form of routing most utilized today is “manual interactive routing,” with only a few higher-end tools possessing automation-assisted interactive routing capabilities. This manual interactive routing is a combination of human effort, along with software tool utilization, and some limited automation. The key here is that the user is manually performing and controlling each and every mouse click of the routing process, but with the addition of tool automation assisting/restricting and guiding the user along the way, and according to the constraints that were implemented.
To read the entire article, which originally appeard in the June 2025 Design007 Magazine, click here.
Share on:
Testimonial
"Advertising in PCB007 Magazine has been a great way to showcase our bare board testers to the right audience. The I-Connect007 team makes the process smooth and professional. We’re proud to be featured in such a trusted publication."
Klaus Koziol - atgSuggested Items
When Layout Learns: This Is Not Your Mother’s Auto-router
03/24/2026 | Marcy LaRont, I-Connect007 MagazineFor decades, automated PCB layout has carried a reputation designers would rather forget. Ben Jordan understands the skepticism. With roots in both engineering and EDA product leadership, he’s seen the promise and the pitfalls up close. Now at Quilter, Ben is helping reshape what machine-driven placement and routing can deliver. Powered by reinforcement learning and modern compute, Quilter is tackling the backlog, iteration overload, and talent shortage facing design teams today.
PCB Design in 2026 and Beyond
02/12/2026 | Filbert Arzola, RaytheonWe asked several experts in PCB design and fabrication about the pressures shaping PCB fabrication today, including speed, density, geopolitics, and relentless technological complexity. The results were valuable insights about where we are, where we’re headed, and importantly, what it will take to get there. Here is Filbert (Fil) Arzola's view of what will be most important and influential for PCB designers going into 2026 and beyond.
A PCB Engineer’s Heartfelt Blueprint for a Life Without Regrets
12/22/2025 | Stephen V. Chavez, PCEAAs PCB engineers, we are puzzle solvers, innovators, and scrupulously detail-oriented wizards of the PCB world. We pour so much of ourselves into our designs, meticulously crafting every detail, and sometimes it feels like our personal lives become just another “component” we’re trying to fit onto an already crowded board. But trust me, designing a robust and reliable life means paying just as much attention to your personal “circuitry” as you do to your professional ones.
Fresh PCB Concepts: Choosing Via Types—A Practical Guide for PCB Engineers
12/18/2025 | Team NCAB -- Column: Fresh PCB ConceptsWhen you first learn PCB routing, vias look like plumbing: holes that let signals pass between layers. As designs become denser and products shrink, vias develop from simple interconnects into deliberate engineering choices. Selecting between through-hole, blind, buried, microvia, or advanced options like skip vias is a balancing act between electrical performance, manufacturability, cost, and long-term reliability. In HDI boards, via strategy is as consequential as the stackup, material selection, or component placement.
Driving Innovation: Depth Routing Processes—Achieving Unparalleled Precision in Complex PCBs
09/08/2025 | Kurt Palmer -- Column: Driving InnovationIn PCB manufacturing, the demand for increasingly complex and miniaturized designs continually pushes the boundaries of traditional fabrication methods, including depth routing. Success in these applications demands not only on robust machinery but also sophisticated control functions. PCB manufacturers rely on advanced machine features and process methodologies to meet their precise depth routing goals. Here, I’ll explore some crucial functions that empower manufacturers to master complex depth routing challenges.