-
- News
- Books
Featured Books
- pcb007 Magazine
Latest Issues
Current IssueTechnology Roadmaps
In this issue of PCB007 Magazine, we discuss technology roadmaps and what they mean for our businesses, providing context to the all-important question: What is my company’s technology roadmap?
Wet Process Control
In this issue, we examine wet processes and how to obtain a better degree of control that allows usable data to guide our decisions and produce consistently higher-quality products.
Don’t Just Survive, Thrive
If we are to be relevant and prosper during these next critical decades in electronics, we must do more than survive. As an industry, we can and must thrive. In this issue, our contributors explore these concepts meant to help you take your business to the next level.
- Articles
- Columns
Search Console
- Links
- Events
||| MENU - pcb007 Magazine
Learning to Be More Flexible: Case Studies on Improving FPC Design
May 14, 2019 | Todd MacFadden, Bose CorporationEstimated reading time: 3 minutes
Like most kids, I spent my childhood dreaming that someday when I grew up I would get to optimize the design and manufacturability of flexible printed circuits. I envisioned the fantastical circuit outlines that would look like a squashed tarantula in 2D, but would origami intricately and elegantly into impossibly small 3D spaces. And, like other kids, I imagined the rigorous training I would receive in school and on the job to teach me exactly what materials to select and what parameters to use to achieve magnificent, robust bends that would (obviously) conform generously to IPC bend radius guidelines.
OK, not really. As a child, I dreamed of being a famous musician, until I learned more about the supply and demand curves for mediocrity. And, as many of us who have done this know, there is no formal training and often no right answer or perfect solution for FPC design. The IPC design standards—such as IPC-2223: Sectional Design Standard for Flexible/Rigid-Flexible Printed Circuits and IPC-6013: Qualification and Performance Specification for Flexible/Rigid-Flexible Printed Boards—provide indispensable guidance and are justifiably the go-to starting place. But the authors of these standards are careful to distinguish between requirements and guidelines, and they acknowledge that the standards cannot possibly encompass all use cases.
This is increasingly true as miniaturization requirements force us to pack more functionality into ever-smaller packages, and it becomes more difficult to conform to IPC construction recommendations. Achieving robust FPCs requires frequent, iterative interaction internally among the mechanical, electrical, and PCB design teams, as well as with the fabricators and assemblers. The sooner in the design cycle we can engage the supplier and assembler, the better.
This article will present three case studies of early prototype designs that didn’t go so well, and the lessons learned from each to highlight some of the challenges we faced and the steps we took to overcome them.
Note: no tarantulas were harmed during the writing of this article or in the design of any circuits.
1. Bend Radius Recommendations—You’re Joking, Right?
The bend radius recommendations from IPC-2223 (Table 1) provide a valiant starting place. But, increasingly, we are so far from these guidelines that design teams ask if we’re joking when we suggest them. It is now more common than not for us to exceed them, and over time, we have learned to accommodate much tighter bends than what IPC recommends. But there have been painful lessons along the way; these recommendations exist for a reason.
Figure 1 illustrates one particularly cringeworthy example. This is a 3-layer circuit (for simplicity, only Layer 2 is shown in the graphic) that is reduced to two layers in the bend regions. The conductors in the bend region were cracking at high rates during assembly. In hindsight, the design mistakes are glaring:
- The tight bend radii are uncontrolled: The two bends are respectively 1.0x and 1.5x the circuit thickness or about 10 times tighter than IPC guidelines. These are effectively creases. It is possible to crease 2-layer flexes, but the creasing operation must be well-controlled and only occur one time—creased circuits must never be reopened. Such care was not taken during this assembly process
Figure 1: Design renderings of a recent FPC failure due to cracked traces, including a 3D illustration of the tight bends (L), and a snapshot of the Layer 2 routing (R), showing some of the features that contributed to the failure.
- The bends begin right at the stiffened region: This is not recommended because it concentrates stress on the conductors. Ideally, there should be 0.5–1.0 mm of length after the stiffened region before a bend.
- Solder mask in the bend region: The solder mask (3) extends beyond the stiffener (1) and into the flex region to accommodate a trace on Layer 1 (not shown in this graphic). Solder mask should always be supported by a stiffener with at least a 0.2-mm overlap to accommodate registration tolerance of both solder mask image and stiffener location. While the solder mask formulations used by most FPC fabricators are referred to as “flexible,” they are not in fact designed to bend, particularly not this sharp. Having solder mask in the bend area increased circuit stiffness precisely where the bend began.
Fortunately, these failures occurred during an early prototype run, so there was time to respond. The circuit was redesigned to address each of these issues; no subsequent failures were encountered.
To read the full article, which appeared in the April 2019 issue of Flex007 Magazine, click here.
Suggested Items
Book Excerpt: The Printed Circuit Assembler’s Guide to... Low-Temperature Soldering, Vol. 2, Chapter 4
10/03/2024 |Chapter 4 of this book addresses the challenges in ensuring high electrical reliability of low-temperature solder pastes in modern electronic assembly. Also covered is the need for new-generation materials due to advancements in technology. The authors also explore the impact of flux components on electrical reliability and the formulation considerations to achieve higher reliability.
AIM to Present on Ultra-Miniature Component Assembly at SMT-Info
10/02/2024 | AIMAIM Solder, a leading global manufacturer of solder assembly materials for the electronics industry, is pleased to announce its participation in the upcoming SMT-Info Technical Conference taking place October 15-16 in Brno, Czech Republic.
Mycronic’s Jet Set Technology
10/02/2024 | Nolan Johnson, SMT007 MagazineIn this interview, Wolfgang Heinecke, head of global product management at Mycronic, discusses advancements and applications of jet printing technology, which offers solutions to the challenges faced by traditional stencil printing. He highlights the key benefits of jet printing, and explains the qualification process for solder paste compatibility as well as the software-driven nature of jet printing, which allows for quick program creation and real-time adjustments.
Metcal Introduces New MicroFine Products for Soldering Under the Microscope
10/02/2024 | MetcalMetcal, part of OK International and Dover and a leader in benchtop soldering for electronics and industrial manufacturing, announced the launch of its new MicroFine soldering handpieces and cartridge tips for use under microscopes.
Indium to Showcase Industry-Leading Solder Paste and Alloy Technology at Detroit Battery Show
10/01/2024 | Indium CorporationAs one of the leading materials providers to the electronics assembly industry, Indium Corporation® is proud to feature its industry-leading Durafuse® solder technology at the Battery Show North America, October 7-10, in Detroit, Michigan.