Insulectro and DuPont Experts Talk Flex Design
September 25, 2019 | Mike Creeden, CID+, InsulectroEstimated reading time: 2 minutes
I recently spoke with Insulectro’s Chris Hunrath and DuPont’s Steven Bowles at the DuPont Technology and Innovation Center in Sunnyvale, California. We discussed a variety of topics related to flex design, including the support structure that’s needed in flex design, the everchanging world of flex materials, and the need for working with a flex fabricator as early as possible in the flex design cycle.
Mike Creeden: Welcome, gentlemen. Today, I’m with Chris Hunrath of Insulectro, the vice president of technology, and Steven Bowles, flex circuit applications engineer at DuPont. Today, we’re visiting the DuPont Silicon Valley Technology and Innovation Center in Sunnyvale, California. This is an impressive facility.
To provide some background on myself, I’m now the technical director of design and education at Insulectro. I’m an EPTAC IPC master instructor teaching CID and CID+ programs, and I’m also the founder of San Diego PCB—a company I sold to Milwaukee Electronics Screaming Circuits in 2016.
Today’s designers and engineers are finding the need for using flex, rigid-flex, and printed electronics in all market segments. As we start approaching the next generation of electronics, materials matter. So, the IPC Designers Council Executive Board created and recommended a definition for the profession of design layout that would be published in the first page of the IPC-2200 series designer specifications. The definition explains what a designer needs to do to make revision 1 work. It has been referred to as “The Designer’s Triangle,” explaining three perspectives for success. The first perspective is DFS (designing for solvability). Truly solving HDI with micro devices as best you can by using any of the CAD tools in front of you. The next perspective for success that the designer needs to accomplish is DFP (design it for performance). As we route our circuits the copper plays a part, and the materials that exist between the copper play a significant part. I’m hoping Chris can address that. The third perspective is DFM (designing for manufacturability), and much of that is why this Technology and Innovation Center exists at DuPont. I’m hoping Steven can tell us about that because people need to be able to discover what the next step is as they consider flex design and how it can be built.
Steven, can you tell us a little bit about your background and your role at DuPont?
Steven Bowles: I’m a flex circuit applications engineer at DuPont Silicon Valley Technology Center. I’ve been with DuPont for a little over a year now. Before that, I manufactured flex, rigid, and rigid-flex circuits for about 15 years. I worked at a few different board shops, all domestically, in multiple processes and engineering positions. I’ve also participated in IPC, am a current member of over a dozen standards development groups, and chair three of them.
Creeden: Next, can you tell us about yourself, Chris?
Chris Hunrath: I’ve worked both on the fabrication side and on the supply side of the PCB industry. I started with multilayers back in 1983 and never looked back. I have been working with the supply side about two-thirds of my career and with Insulectro for the past 18 years. I work a lot with our customers, especially on the flex circuit side, by helping them select the right materials and with the processes in the fabrication of flexible circuit boards.
To read this entire interview, which appeared in the August 2019 issue of Design007 Magazine, click here.
Suggested Items
Beyond Design: Electro-optical Circuit Boards
01/22/2025 | Barry Olney -- Column: Beyond DesignPredicting the role of PCB designers in 10 years is a challenge. If only I had a crystal ball. However, we know that as technology progresses, the limitations of copper PCBs are increasingly apparent, particularly regarding speed, bandwidth, and signal integrity. Innovations such as optical interconnects and photonic integrated circuits are setting the stage for the next generation of PCBs, delivering higher performance and efficiency. The future of PCB design will probably incorporate these new technologies to address the challenges of traditional copper-based designs.
Designers Notebook: Impact of Advanced Semiconductor Packaging on PCB Stackup
01/07/2025 | Vern Solberg -- Column: Designer's NotebookTo accommodate new generations of high I/O semiconductor packaging, printed circuit board fabrication technology has had to undergo significant changes in both the process methods and the criteria for base material selection and construction sequence (stackup). Many of the new high-function multi-core semiconductor package families require more terminals than their predecessors, requiring a significantly narrower terminal pitch. Interconnecting these very fine-pitch, high I/O semiconductors to the PCB is made possible by an intermediate element referred to as an interposer.
BOOK EXCERPT: The Printed Circuit Designer’s Guide to... High Performance Materials, Chapter 4
01/02/2025 | I-Connect007In Chapter 4, Michael Gay discusses the two main types of copper foil used for PCB boards today: electrodeposited (ED) foil and rolled annealed (RA) foil. He also explains the pros and cons of each, and provides an update of the latest innovations in copper foil technology.
Connect the Dots: Designing for Reality—Solder Mask and Legend
01/02/2025 | Matt Stevenson -- Column: Connect the DotsIn the previous episode of I-Connect007’s On the Line with… podcast, we discussed the strip, etch, and strip process. At this point, we have a functioning board, but we still need to protect the PCB from environmental effects and document the circuit components. This brings us to the solder mask and legend phase of production.
Global PCB Connections: Following DFM Rules Leads to Better Boards
12/18/2024 | Jerome Larez -- Column: Global PCB ConnectionsAs a PCB field applications engineer, ensuring smooth communication between PCB designers and fabricators is one of my frequent challenges. A critical part of that dialogue is design for manufacturing (DFM). Many designers, even experienced ones, often misunderstand or overlook important DFM considerations. They may confuse design rules with manufacturing minimums, leading to technically feasible designs that are difficult or costly to produce. In this column, I will clarify some common DFM guidelines and help designers understand the difference between “design rules” and “minimums” while sharing best practices that will simplify the production process and ensure the highest quality PCB.