Average DRAM Contract Price Sank Nearly 10% in October
November 2, 2015 | TrendForceEstimated reading time: 3 minutes
The latest DRAM price report from DRAMeXchange, a division of TrendForce, finds that the average contract price of DDR3 4GB modules fell by 10% from US$18.5 in September to US$16.75 in October. The lowest contract price in the market is currently at US$16.5. Both monthly and quarterly contract prices dropped as the outlook of the notebook market has become more conservative after the peak season. Fourth-quarter notebook shipments are expected to contract by 1% quarterly, and this lack of end demand has resulted in excess DRAM inventory for PC-OEMs. Moreover, DRAM suppliers are now producing on the advanced 20/21 processes and thereby increasing the overall DRAM supply. Consequently, average contract prices for all DRAM modules fell through the US$17 floor in October as the market favored buyers.
The decline of DDR3 4GB module’s average contract price has exceeded 50% this year from US$29.5 to the current US$16.75, according to Avril Wu, assistant vice president of DRAMeXchange, a division of TrendForce. The contract prices of DDR3 4GB modules will continue to fall as the global economy will remain sluggish until the middle of 2016. Rather than scaling back their production, top DRAM suppliers Samsung and SK Hynix will expand their capacity to head off China’s efforts to create a formidable “Red Supply Chain” for its memory industry. Though increasing capacity will result in short-term price fluctuations and even declining profits, this action is necessary to retain market shares and raise the competitive barriers against potential rivals.
South Korean DRAM giants to increase their capacity in 2016 and widen the technology gap to prevent the rise of “Red Supply Chain” in China
As Samsung, SK Hynix and Micron maintain an oligopoly in the global DRAM market, increasing profits have taken over capacity expansion and technology migration as their top priority. However, they have become increasingly worried by China’s determination to build its own semiconductor sector because the cornerstone of this project is the formation of a domestic DRAM industry. The policy imperative of the Chinese government are seen in a series of events – from Tsinghua Unigroup’s offers to Micron, formation of XMC to Powerchip and UMC’s respective constructions of new fabs in Hefei and Xiamen.
While this flurry of activities by the Chinese do not pose an immediate and serious threat, the industry will feel their impacts in the long run. In response, the dominant South Korean suppliers are now raising the entry barriers to the global semiconductor industry early on. Though their efforts are uncoordinated, they both seek to stop their Chinese competitors simultaneously on the technology and production fronts.
Samsung plans to increase it Line 17 fab’s capacity from 40,000 to 50,000 wafer starts per month. The global DRAM leader will also widen the technological gap between it and its competitors by migrating to the 18nm manufacturing ahead of schedule and will be producing on this advanced process as early as 2016.
Likewise, SK Hynix is taking a more proactive approach in capacity expansion. By the end of this year, the supplier’s M14 fab will increase from 15,000 to 70,000 wafer starts per month. SK Hynix will thus be able to maintain its overall capacity level for next year even as its older fabs undergo technology migration and lose some capacity in the process. In terms of production technology, SK Hynix’s 21nm process will be formally entering production in this fourth quarter. At least 50% of the supplier’s total capacity will based on this technology by the middle of 2016. SK Hynix is also developing the 18nm technology, which is scheduled for testing at the end of next year.
In contrast to the other two major suppliers, Micron appears to be making slow progress on the technology front. The company is distracted by the departures of personnel at the senior management level. More seriously, its R&D unit in Japan is losing talents as well due to turnovers and raids from competitors. These problems will have a significant impact on Micron’s plans to advance towards the 20nm manufacturing and to develop the next-generation memory technology.
Suggested Items
ZESTRON Academy Launches 2024 Advanced Packaging & Power Electronics Webinar Series
05/01/2024 | ZESTRONZESTRON, the leading global provider of high-precision cleaning products, services, and training solutions in the electronics manufacturing and semiconductor industries, proudly announces the launch of its highly anticipated webinar series on Advanced Packaging & Power Electronics, a webinar series on the latest innovations, cleaning, and corrosion challenges.
The New Industry: Will the Growth Continue?
04/30/2024 | I-Connect007 Editorial TeamHow sustainable are the primary financial models in the United States regarding PCB fabrication shops? In this interview with economic experts Shawn DuBravac and Tom Kastner, we explore what’s happening with U.S. printed circuit board shops in today’s market, how consolidation affects the industry, and what can be done.
TTM’s High Tech Expansion and Industry Innovation
04/30/2024 | Marcy LaRont, PCB007 MagazineTom Edman has been the CEO of TTM Technologies since 2014 and has an extensive background in electronics and manufacturing. TTM is a leading global manufacturer of technology solutions, including mission systems, RF component and RF microwave microelectronics assemblies, and quick turn and advanced technology printed circuit boards.
U.S. Companies Invest Heavily in Robots
04/30/2024 | IFRManufacturing companies in the United States have invested heavily in more automation: total installations of industrial robots rose by 12% and reached 44,303 units in 2023. Number one adopter is the car industry followed by the electrical and electronics sector.
USPAE to Springboard U.S. Technology Forward
04/30/2024 | Marcy LaRont, PCB007 MagazineThe U.S. Partnership for Assured Electronics (USPAE) was launched as a nonprofit subsidiary of IPC in 2020, specifically to manage the DoD relationship and access to funding, and to develop a cooperative facility to develop UHDI capabilities in the U.S., not only for the defense sector, but for the whole of the U.S. electronics industry. It is a tall order, but industry veteran Joe O'Neil believes it will happen. Having been tasked with making the UHDI Capable Cooperative Production Facility (UCCPF) a reality, he provides an update on this important project for U.S. electronics manufacturing.