-
- News
- Books
Featured Books
- pcb007 Magazine
Latest Issues
Current IssueVoices of the Industry
We take the pulse of the PCB industry by sharing insights from leading fabricators and suppliers in this month's issue. We've gathered their thoughts on the new U.S. administration, spending, the war in Ukraine, and their most pressing needs. It’s an eye-opening and enlightening look behind the curtain.
The Essential Guide to Surface Finishes
We go back to basics this month with a recount of a little history, and look forward to addressing the many challenges that high density, high frequency, adhesion, SI, and corrosion concerns for harsh environments bring to the fore. We compare and contrast surface finishes by type and application, take a hard look at the many iterations of gold plating, and address palladium as a surface finish.
It's Show Time!
In this month’s issue of PCB007 Magazine we reimagine the possibilities featuring stories all about IPC APEX EXPO 2025—covering what to look forward to, and what you don’t want to miss.
- Articles
- Columns
Search Console
- Links
- Media kit
||| MENU - pcb007 Magazine
Estimated reading time: 2 minutes

The Bare (Board) Truth: Getting on the Same Page—A Data Story
In this month’s column, I will discuss what makes a great incoming dataset for PCB fabrication.
Drawings and README Files
The overall part thickness should be expressed as the desired thickness measured between two points, including tolerances. For example:
- 0.062” ±10% metal-to-metal including surface finish
This description tells us the part will be 0.062” nominal with an allowed variance of ±10% measured over the finished plated metal and surface finish. If the drawing or README file merely states 0.062”, the fabricator must establish whether or not this is a maximum thickness or if a tolerance is associated with it. The note also says nothing about what distance 0.062” refers to. Is it 0.062” glass-to-glass over the material, or is it metal-to-metal? Does this include plate-up and surface finish, or is it an overall dielectric with a tolerance, such as ±10%?
Thickness callouts for single-sided or double-sided orders are even more critical. As a fabricator, we can control the thickness of the multilayer by using different combinations of prepregs/cores. If a customer calls out a single-sided or double-sided job as 0.008”, is this the core dielectric or an overall dielectric? If 0.008” represents the core dielectric callout on a 2-ounce finished part, the final thickness would be closer to 0.013”. If the callout for 0.008” pertains to the overall finished thickness, we would need to start at a 0.004” core to finish at approximately 0.009” after plate, surface finish, and mask. Again, notes about thickness should ideally describe what the overall thickness is to be and the points from which they should be measured.
Another example of drawing callouts that can require clarification is copper callouts. If the drawing or README file expresses the copper merely as 2-ounce copper, this leaves the fabricator with more questions. Is it a starting or finished copper callout? If the part is a multilayer board, is it 2-ounce inners and 2-ounce finished outers? If that’s the case, a fabricator will start on 1-ounce copper clad outers and plate to a 1-ounce finish. IPC dictates that there be a minimum of 0.0008” copper in the barrels of the holes for conductivity concerns. Fabricators typically plate up in whole ounce increments to ensure this minimum requirement is met, so a part that started on half-ounce copper foil would finish at 1.5 ounces after plate.
If a note merely reads 1-ounce finish, the fabricator must call the customer to clarify their intentions because starting on 0.05-ounce foil and plating to 1 ounce does not meet IPC minimum requirements for hole wall thickness.
To read this entire column, which appeared in the October 2018 issue of Design007 Magazine, click here.
Visit I-007eBooks to download your copies of Prototron Circuits' micro eBook today:
The Printed Circuit Designer's Guide to...Producing the Perfect Data Package
More Columns from The Bare (Board) Truth
The Bare (Board) Truth: My Top Six Design ChallengesThe Bare (Board) Truth: Via Basics
The Bare (Board) Truth: 5 Questions About Improving Thermal Management
The Bare (Board) Truth: Teaching the Next Generation—An Overview of Today’s University Courses
The Bare (Board) Truth: Fabrication Starts With Solid Design Practices
Board Negotiations: Design Rules and Tolerances
The Bare (Board) Truth: Eliminate Confusion
The Bare (Board) Truth: Refining Output Data Packages for Fabricators