-
- News
- Books
Featured Books
- smt007 Magazine
Latest Issues
Current IssueWhat's Your Sweet Spot?
Are you in a niche that’s growing or shrinking? Is it time to reassess and refocus? We spotlight companies thriving by redefining or reinforcing their niche. What are their insights?
Moving Forward With Confidence
In this issue, we focus on sales and quoting, workforce training, new IPC leadership in the U.S. and Canada, the effects of tariffs, CFX standards, and much more—all designed to provide perspective as you move through the cloud bank of today's shifting economic market.
Intelligent Test and Inspection
Are you ready to explore the cutting-edge advancements shaping the electronics manufacturing industry? The May 2025 issue of SMT007 Magazine is packed with insights, innovations, and expert perspectives that you won’t want to miss.
- Articles
- Columns
- Links
- Media kit
||| MENU - smt007 Magazine
Survey: Reasons U.S. Electronics Manufacturers May Exit Defense Market
June 9, 2021 | IPCEstimated reading time: 2 minutes

In a new IPC industry survey and report, one-quarter (24 percent) of electronic manufacturers say the costs and burdens of compliance with the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) may force them out of the U.S. Department of Defense’s (DoD) supply chain.
The survey conducted by IPC, the global electronics manufacturing association, also finds that for many small- to medium-size businesses (SMB), the costs and burdens of CMMC compliance may outweigh the benefits of doing business with the DoD.
In addition, 33 percent of respondents say the CMMC will weaken the U.S. defense electronics industrial base, while 18 percent are unsure, highlighting the uncertainties involved. And 41 percent believe applying the CMMC clause to their suppliers will create other problems in the supply chain.
“Cybersecurity is a must for U.S. national security, but the costs and burdens of achieving CMMC compliance under the current approach will likely force many small and medium-sized manufacturers out of the DoD supply chain, negatively impacting national security,” said John Mitchell, IPC president and CEO. “The objectives of CMMC are well-intentioned, but they must not be achieved at the expense of other key aspects of supply chain health.”
Most suppliers expect and are willing to spend upwards of $50,000 on CMMC readiness, and nearly one-third (32 percent) report that it will take them one to two years to prepare to undergo CMMC assessment. However, more than half of the suppliers say implementation costs of more than $100,000 would make CMMC readiness too expensive. DoD’s own cost analysis estimated the cost of a CMMC Maturity Level 3 (ML3) certification to be more than $118,000 in the first year. This means DoD’s own estimate of CMMC compliance costs is too high for 77 percent of the IPC survey respondents.
“The Pentagon needs to take into consideration that most SMBs do not have dedicated cybersecurity personnel to achieve the prerequisites, and while many commercial electronics manufacturers have considerable business with the defense community, they themselves do not consider themselves a defense contractor,” added Mitchell.
The study’s author, cyber security expert Leslie Weinstein, says the DoD can reduce the costs and uncertainties of CMMC compliance by leveraging existing industry standards and certifications, such as IPC-1791, the electronics industry’s “Trusted Supplier” standard, which was designed in collaboration with the DoD; or the certifications offered by HITRUST or the International Standards Organization.
“The DoD recognizes a variety of respected, industry-driven certifications when it comes to hiring cybersecurity professionals,” says Weinstein. “Taking the same approach to certifying suppliers would allow companies to invest more in security than in redundant audits, and it would quickly create a pool of companies who are able to bid on DoD solicitations containing the CMMC DFARS clause. And importantly, it would prevent further erosion of the U.S. defense industrial base.”
IPC fielded the survey between February 25 and March 5, 2021 and garnered 108 responses from contract manufacturers, printed circuit board fabricators, original equipment manufacturers and suppliers who self-reported they are planning to undergo a CMMC assessment in the next five years.
Suggested Items
Delta Electronics Thailand Ranked Among Asia’s Top Corporates at the Alpha Southeast Asia 15th Institutional Investor Awards
07/14/2025 | Delta ElectronicsDelta Electronics (Thailand) Public Company Limited, a global leader in power management and smart green solutions, has been recognized by global investors for its excellence in investor relations and corporate governance, earning top ranking in the “Most Improved Investor Relations” at the Alpha Southeast Asia 15th Annual Institutional Investor Awards for Corporates, held on June 30, 2025, in Singapore.
Kimball Electronics' Pride Month Celebrations
07/14/2025 | Kimball ElectronicsAt Kimball Electronics, we believe in fostering a culture of inclusion, respect, and belonging. This June, our global teams came together to celebrate PRIDE Month with meaningful actions that reflect our commitment to the LGBTQ+ community.
NOTE Posts Interim Report for Q2 2025
07/14/2025 | NOTENOTE reports stable second-quarter results for 2025 with continued profitability and strong cash flow, reaffirming its growth strategy despite a challenging market environment.
Scanfil, MB Elettronica to Join Forces
07/14/2025 | ScanfilFinnish Scanfil, the largest European stock exchange listed Electronic Manufacturing Service company in terms of turnover, and Italian MB Elettronica (“MB”) from Cortona Arezzo have agreed to join forces.
PCBAA’s David Schild: Where U.S. Electronics Manufacturing Stands Today
07/14/2025 | Marcy LaRont, I-Connect007As the U.S. Congress looks toward a summer break, David Schild of PCBAA discusses the growing momentum in U.S. electronics manufacturing policy, emphasizing bipartisan support for reshoring efforts, the importance of targeted tax incentives, and the challenges posed by global competition. He highlights PCBAA’s growth, advocacy on Capitol Hill, and the need for sustained investment to revitalize the PCB industry.