-
- News
- Books
Featured Books
- smt007 Magazine
Latest Issues
Current IssueComing to Terms With AI
In this issue, we examine the profound effect artificial intelligence and machine learning are having on manufacturing and business processes. We follow technology, innovation, and money as automation becomes the new key indicator of growth in our industry.
Box Build
One trend is to add box build and final assembly to your product offering. In this issue, we explore the opportunities and risks of adding system assembly to your service portfolio.
IPC APEX EXPO 2024 Pre-show
This month’s issue devotes its pages to a comprehensive preview of the IPC APEX EXPO 2024 event. Whether your role is technical or business, if you're new-to-the-industry or seasoned veteran, you'll find value throughout this program.
- Articles
- Columns
Search Console
- Links
- Events
||| MENU - smt007 Magazine
Where Have All the Board Shops Gone?
March 2, 2022 | Stanley L. Bentley, ICAPE GroupEstimated reading time: 4 minutes
When I look at the landscape of U.S.-based PCB fabricators, the title of this article reminds me of a 1960s protest song. If you don’t remember the song or that era, you have some interesting research to do. As well, a Hank Williams, Jr., song comes to mind, “All my rowdy friends have settled…” Seriously, I am pleased to see many of my old friends taking advantage of the present opportunities.
The U.S. PCB industry is seeing a third wave of activity that is removing PCB shops from the general marketplace. In the late 1990s and early 2000s, there was a wave of closures as the PCB business quickly transitioned to Asia. This move was so sudden that many shops could not transition fast enough to remain in business.
The second wave, which happened around 2005, was what I call “The Key Takers”; these were ruthless raiders that promised struggling shops a way to preserve their business, protect their employees, and maintain a comfortable lifestyle. None of that was true, as their only desire was to obtain the customers without investing any cash. The shops were auctioned, the customers transferred to an outsourcing agent, and the owners discharged (while keeping the debt).
Now, the third wave is gaining momentum. There seems to be two different groups gobbling up the remaining U.S. shops. The first are the investment groups that are “rolling up” shops into one entity. This is an activity that is common for fragmented industries. The only question is why it took so long in the PCB space. The other is a bit of a surprise. We are seeing M&A brokers approaching independent shops on behalf of an OEM. The apparent motive is not about earnings or vertical integration, but rather a way of stabilizing their supply chain for PCBs. Ironically, the PCB industry in the U.S. began that way with the shops owned by large OEMs. It is unclear whether either of these trends is good for the consumer. Investor groups don’t buy things with any regard to the public good. They are looking for profits and the multiple those profits create in stock pricing. An OEM purchase does little for the industry as it removes capacity and options.
So, where does this leave the consumer? Only time can really answer that question. But in the short term, the expected result is more confusion. Rolling up shops looks simple to investors. In fact, it is an easy “picture to paint.” In reality, it is very difficult to combine PCB shops without impacting customers. The reason is a unique part of the business that does not have a “column” in a financial analysis. No two shops have the same process technology. In areas like California and Chicago, many of the shops are spinoffs from other shops, so there is some commonality. However, as the time between the spinoff increases, these common elements begin to disappear. Since most of the spinoffs happened 10 to 20 years ago, the similarities are greatly reduced. For the shops that are not a spinoff, there is virtually no commonality. In a traditional roll up, the common functions are (immediately) combined to reduce overhead costs and smaller acquisitions are absorbed into the larger to fill excess capacity. Fab shops that have survived to this point do not have excess capacity. This is particularly true of the higher technology processes such as laser drilling, laser direct imaging, via filling, reverse pulse plating, and so on. If the shops in a roll up are left more independent and the holes in their processes are filled (which requires investment), the disruption to the customer is minimized. If there is an immediate move to “fix them,” the results are usually not good. Every fab shop has its own “secret sauce,” and that secret is often confined to a few key individuals. (“Momma’s spaghetti can’t be made with store-bought sauce.”)
The OEM acquisition has its own difficulties. It would be rare for the OEM to need 100% of the capacity of the shop they acquired. Therefore, the acquisition strategy likely includes a plan to continue to satisfy existing customers and use that revenue to pay for the acquisition. Rarely does the OEM consider the continued investments that must be made to service the technology advances of the general market. The probable result is that they will gravitate to a wholly captive situation to reduce the investment. This will have the effect of displacing customers who must seek other suppliers.
One solution to the market disruption is to look for stable solutions that have been in the marketplace for enough years to allow the customers to evaluate their performance. The predominant model that has emerged over the past 20 years is the PCB trading partner. This model has shown very significant growth in the post pandemic recovery. There are a variety of reasons why this model offers viable solutions.
To read this entire article, which appeared in the March 2022 issue of SMT007 Magazine, click here.
Suggested Items
Real Time with… IPC APEX EXPO 2024: Insulectro on Attracting Young Talent to the Electronics Manufacturing Industry
05/16/2024 | Real Time with...IPC APEX EXPOInsulectro's Doug Gotelli and Mitchell Benson explore the challenges of drawing young talent into the electronics manufacturing industry. They underscore the significance of manufacturing and the urgency of tackling the workforce shortage. They also discuss internship programs, the industry's resilience amid the pandemic, and the rewarding experiences of working in this sector.
European Chips Skills Academy Launches Summer School in Italy to Promote Microelectronics Industry Careers
05/16/2024 | SEMIUniversity students will connect with professors to explore semiconductor learning paths and employment opportunities at the European Chip Skills Academy Summer School, August 18-23, 2024 in Bologna, Italy.
SEMICON West 2024 to Spotlight U.S. Chip Industry Investments, Supply Chain Resilience, Talent, and Global Growth and Innovation
05/15/2024 | SEMISEMICON West 2024 will gather industry experts and leaders July 9-11 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco for insights into the latest trends and innovations in sustainability, supply chain management, workforce development and other critical industry issues.
A Potpourri of Design PD Classes
05/14/2024 | Kelly Dack, I-Connect007What is invention without innovation? What is innovation without capability? Kelly Dack addresses these questions and more in this review of the Professional Development courses at IPC APEX EXPO, including the flex course lead by "Flexperts" Mark Finstad and Nick Koop.
Viscom’s Approach to Inline X-Ray
05/14/2024 | Barry Matties, I-Connect007In this interview, Viscom President Ed Moll and CEO Jesper Lykke discuss the importance of inline X-rays for real-time data and board inspection. They also discuss AI integration, customer inquiries, and ROI considerations. Also, as Ed moves into semi-retirement, he reflects on his long career, recent developments, and the evolving X-ray industry. He shares his insights on career opportunities for emerging engineers in the industry.