Happy’s Tech Talk #34: Producibility and Other Pseudo-metrics
It’s Only Common Sense: Results Come from Action, Not Intention
The New Chapter: Navigating Maternity Leave in the Electronics Industry
Book Excerpt: 'The Printed Circuit Assembler’s Guide to...Process Control', Chapter 1
August 9, 2023 | I-Connect007Estimated reading time: 1 minute
Excerpt from: The Printed Circuit Assembler’s Guide to...Process Control
Chapter 1: How Did We Get Here?
Measuring SIR has been in use since at least the 1970s. We are aware that Siemens in Germany and GEC Marconi in the UK both developed SIR test systems that have remarkably similar measurement techniques. In 1987, research commenced to evaluate alternative chemistries to CFCs, such as Freon®, to be used in the cleaning of electronic assemblies. The pressure for this came from the Montreal Protocol, an international treaty designed to protect the ozone layer by phasing out the production of numerous substances responsible for ozone depletion. It was agreed on 16 September 1987 and entered into force on 1 January 1989.
This research was initially conducted by IVF (The Swedish Institute for Production Engineering based in Gothenburg) on behalf of business groups throughout the Baltic territories, and by NPL (The British National Physical Laboratory near London) on behalf of several major electronics businesses in the UK and Ireland. (GEN3 have a library of the majority of papers produced by both groups for anyone who is interested.)
The major obstacle encountered was: how do you assess how clean is clean—especially when the process control tool in use at that time was the ROSE test. The ROSE test, of course, needs to be considered as a cleaning process, so there is overlap and conflict with the cleaning technologies. This was especially problematic when “no-clean” fluxes were introduced, as cleaning was not intended; but, then, how do we measure? This is where SIR testing came into broader use. GEC were the only company who commercialised their equipment—the prototype AutoSIR we manufacture today.
It was in 1990 that the first known effort to implement objective evidence was done by GEC Meters in the UK, by the team under the leadership of B.J. Mason. The resulting paper, “No-clean Flux Appraisal—The Total Process Approach” was published by Circuit World Vol. 20, No. 2, 1994. The industry resolutely continued using the ROSE test for optimum convenience, so much so that it became regarded as the “Cleanliness Test” but…
Continue reading this book by visiting our library here.
Share on:
Suggested Items
Keysight Providing Software to Enable Researchers through the Microelectronics Commons
11/15/2024 | Keysight TechnologiesKeysight Technologies, Inc. announced it has reached an agreement to provide its electronic design automation (EDA) software to six of the eight hubs participating in the Microelectronics Commons (Commons).
TRI’s SEMI and SMT Inspection Solutions at NEPCON Japan 2025
11/15/2024 | TRITest Research, Inc. (TRI), the leading Test and Inspection systems provider for the electronics manufacturing industry, will join NEPCON Japan 2025, held at Tokyo Big Sight from January 22 – 24, 2025.
X-59 Engine Roars, Lockheed Martin Starts Last Major Ground Test
11/12/2024 | Lockheed MartinLockheed Martin Skunk Works, in partnership with NASA Aeronautics, started X-59 engine run testing, marking the aircraft's final major system check-out before taxi tests and first flight. The tests also mark the first time the X-59 was powered fully internally.
TRI at SMTA Silicon Valley Expo & Tech Forum 2024
11/12/2024 | TRITest Research, Inc. (TRI), the leading provider of test and inspection systems for the electronics manufacturing industry, will join the SMTA Silicon Valley Expo & Tech Forum 2024 on December 5, 2024, at the Fremont Marriott Silicon Valley.
Automating Test Processes in Modern PCBA Manufacturing
11/12/2024 | Josh Casper, Horizon SalesICT and functional test play critical roles in the electronics manufacturing process. In many cases, these processes are the final line of defense in identifying defects, preventing failures from reaching the end user, and safeguarding a manufacturer's reputation. A growing problem in this area has been the sheer increase in production output from the SMT line. As components get smaller, PCBs will continue shrinking, allowing engineers to design highly panelized products.