-
- News
- Books
Featured Books
- smt007 Magazine
Latest Issues
Current IssueIntelligent Test and Inspection
Are you ready to explore the cutting-edge advancements shaping the electronics manufacturing industry? The May 2025 issue of SMT007 Magazine is packed with insights, innovations, and expert perspectives that you won’t want to miss.
Do You Have X-ray Vision?
Has X-ray’s time finally come in electronics manufacturing? Join us in this issue of SMT007 Magazine, where we answer this question and others to bring more efficiency to your bottom line.
IPC APEX EXPO 2025: A Preview
It’s that time again. If you’re going to Anaheim for IPC APEX EXPO 2025, we’ll see you there. In the meantime, consider this issue of SMT007 Magazine to be your golden ticket to planning the show.
- Articles
- Columns
Search Console
- Links
- Media kit
||| MENU - smt007 Magazine
Thinking Inside the Box for a Change
April 10, 2024 | I-Connect007 Editorial TeamEstimated reading time: 5 minutes

In this interview, Joe O’Neil discusses the growing importance of box build from an EMS provider perspective. Supply chain disruptions and the desire to offer more value to customers have fueled interest in box build. Additionally, mass customization is emerging as a trend, allowing for personalized product variations. While Tier 1 companies have mastered this approach, Tier 2 and 3 players hold significant opportunities in the industrial space.
Nolan Johnson: Joe, from an EMS perspective, is box build growing?
Joe O’Neil: Yes, and the global events of the past four years may have led to an acceleration of a natural progression wherein EMS players continue to expand, moving further upstream––or downstream––as they figure out their niche in the EMS provider space.
In terms of customer retention, box build was very sticky for us over the years. The supply chain disruption and getting your hands on the later stages of the product as it went through the transformation process increased in importance. Providing more value to the customer through box build is a good reason to get into it. There can be some factors you can put into your in-region vs. low-cost-region calculator to determine where it makes sense for OEMs to have their product built.
Another driver on a macro level is mass customization. This is the ability to build in-region and provide options for the “31 flavors” of your product. Now, customers can decide what configurations they want today and get them tomorrow. It is a major differentiator for the OEM, and also an opportunity for the EMS suppliers to capitalize on proximity.
Johnson: How much is that style of built-to-order business growing in electronics manufacturing?
O'Neil: It's surprising in the industrial space. Think of the maturity of the Dell model. You can configure your laptop, and it shows up the next morning. That’s pretty impressive. The Tier 1 companies have been executing quite well in this space. My perspective is shaped more by the sub-$100 million EMS supplier folks.
Johnson: Tiers 2 and 3 are probably where the most interesting stuff is happening.
O'Neil: That’s where the opportunities lie. Certainly, the U.S. is where the largest pool of players is. While there are new service opportunities, in-region fulfillment presents some challenges, or at minimum, some things to consider before you jump into a very capital- and facility-space-intensive sector of the business.
Johnson: Is it labor intensive?
O’Neil: Yes, but it’s no harder than staffing SMT lines, or finding skilled, qualified engineers for that role. This is one of those areas where you can find talent in adjacent industries and pull them in. So, it’s one of the easier areas to find talent vs. the usual dynamic of EMS guys stealing labor from each other. While the labor pool is a little bit broader, the cost of quality is certainly higher.
Barry Matties: Isn’t box build more employee-dependent, or is automation really a factor there?
O’Neil: Box build comes in a lot of different flavors. There are places for automation, especially in the high customization piece. The ability is there, for example, to have a robotic arm turning screws. But the lower quantity, higher customization, just-in-time type of service better lends itself to labor.
Johnson: U.S. companies might be looking at box build to increase their revenue, but does it improve their margin?
O’Neil: You may lose a point or two in your percentage of margin, but in terms of hard dollars, it can be quite profitable. You can stack your margins a bit. Keep the traditional board-level business where overheads and everything are already calculated. Then, perhaps, add more overhead allocation as you go upstream, delivering higher levels of subassemblies and even final assemblies. But it cuts both ways: Your top line is growing, but your time-to-revenue, inventory, carry, and cash-to-cash cycle will be extended.
Many EMS companies operate on a purchase order-to-purchase order model. When you get into this higher level of engagement with an OEM, master service agreements become increasingly important.
We all know the example of the $10,000 screw or the $10,000 resistor. You have 99.9% of the bill of materials, and that’s great, but you can’t build it until you have 100%. With box build, that sub-penny part isn’t holding up a couple hundred dollars on a board; now it might be holding up tens of thousands of dollars of a system. Put a couple hundred of those stuck jobs together, and it can get real dark really quickly.
You’ll need to have your inventory controls really tight, and you’ll have systems visibility on multi-level BOMs, and what-if scenarios. It’s a different level of system and maturity when you go from 100 boards to 100 boxes. Are you building out 19-inch racks for a customer? If you’re doing 100 racks a day, and you bring in two weeks’ worth, suddenly you might have just filled a quarter of your facility with pallets. Then you have ESD, foam boxes, packaging pallets, the loading dock—it’s a major impact on a facility and not something you can go into overnight.
If you want to make box build part of your core value proposition, then you must understand your cash-to-cash cycle—your supply base. As we went through the supply chain ripples, people got gun shy about just-in-time deliveries and quickly pivoted to adding more safety stock and increasing inventory levels. Everyone relaxed in terms of inventory efficiencies. However, when you manage these higher-level assemblies, you may need to consider returning to just-in-time delivery practices. You need a good vendor-supplier management program.
With an in-region supplier, those challenging parts can be fed upstream into your supplier base. Now you don’t need to bring in two weeks’ worth of those racks. You can agree to 100 a day, transform them, and ship them out. The next day, another 100 show up, but it requires that you have vendor management in place and some reliable local partners.
Continue reading the rest of this conversation in the April 2024 issue of SMT007 Magazine.
Suggested Items
KLA Reports Fiscal 2025 Q3 Results
05/02/2025 | PRNewswireKLA Corporation announced financial and operating results for its third quarter of fiscal year 2025, which ended on March 31, 2025, and reported GAAP net income of $1.09 billion and GAAP net income per diluted share of $8.16 on revenues of $3.06 billion.
OSI Systems Reports Fiscal 2025 Q3 Financial Results
05/02/2025 | BUSINESS WIREOSI Systems, Inc. announced its financial results for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2025.
Nano Dimension Announces 2024 Financial Results
05/02/2025 | Nano DimensionNano Dimension Ltd., a leader in Digital Manufacturing solutions, announced its 2024 financial results and shared its 2025 strategic outlook.
Wolfspeed Announces Executive Leadership Change
05/02/2025 | WolfspeedWolfspeed, Inc. announced that it has mutually agreed with Neill Reynolds to conclude his role as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, effective May 30, 2025, to pursue another professional opportunity.
Spirit AeroSystems Reports First Quarter 2025 Results
05/02/2025 | Spirit AeroSystems, Inc.Spirit's revenue in the first quarter of 2025 decreased from the same period of 2024, primarily due to lower production activity on most Boeing programs, particularly the Boeing 737 program.