-
- News
- Books
Featured Books
- smt007 Magazine
Latest Issues
Current IssueDo You Have X-ray Vision?
Has X-ray’s time finally come in electronics manufacturing? Join us in this issue of SMT007 Magazine, where we answer this question and others to bring more efficiency to your bottom line.
IPC APEX EXPO 2025: A Preview
It’s that time again. If you’re going to Anaheim for IPC APEX EXPO 2025, we’ll see you there. In the meantime, consider this issue of SMT007 Magazine to be your golden ticket to planning the show.
Technical Resources
Key industry organizations–all with knowledge sharing as a part of their mission–share their technical repositories in this issue of SMT007 Magazine. Where can you find information critical to your work? Odds are, right here.
- Articles
- Columns
Search Console
- Links
- Media kit
||| MENU - smt007 Magazine
Estimated reading time: 5 minutes

Elementary Mr. Watson: Navigating RF—A Glide Path Approach to Design Success
On a flight, I can always tell when we begin our descent because that subtle drop in my stomach tells me the altitude has changed. Landing an airplane involves a gradual, precise process called the glide path.
It descends at the correct speed and 3-degree angle to touch down smoothly and safely on the runway without bouncing or coming to a sudden stop. Pilots use specialized tools like the Instrument Landing System (ILS) or GPS to stay on the correct path. Lights on the ground, called PAPI lights, help pilots know if they are too high or too low.
IRF design can be a rather vague term. The official definition of RF refers to any frequency from 3 kHz to 300 GHz within the electromagnetic spectrum, and just as a pilot follows a precise glide path, engineers must carefully control the signal's path. Like a plane drifting off course, RF signals can quickly weaken or become lost at high frequencies. Even minor mistakes, such as a misplaced trace, can cause significant problems, just as a slight miscalculation in a plane landing can lead to a crash.
In low-frequency PCB design, several factors become critical in an RF design. Low-frequency PCB designs are more straightforward and forgiving than RF designs, which require more precision and careful planning. Unless you follow the required glide path, you cannot transition from your 32,000-foot cruising altitude to your landing spot. You might find that you miss the airport entirely. Likewise, everything changes when you transition from being a low-frequency PCB designer to the world of RF. At low frequencies such as DC or low AC, copper connections are essentially just wires connecting points and mainly serve as conductors. Wire layout and length are less critical when designing circuits that operate at low frequencies. You connect everything, and the signal works. However, at RF frequencies, wires no longer act simply as conductors. They behave like transmission lines. Improperly designed transmission lines can cause signal travel problems. One problem is signal reflection; the signal returns to its origin rather than continuing. This can weaken the signal or cause interference. Another problem is the creation of standing waves, where the signal doesn't travel smoothly and instead creates high and low power areas along the transmission line. This can distort the signal and lead to loss of data or clarity.
To prevent these issues, engineers employ a technique known as controlled impedance—designing the transmission lines with a specific impedance, such as 50Ω or 75Ω, to match the signal's characteristics. With the correct impedance, the signal can travel smoothly without being reflected or distorted. Proper impedance matching is crucial to maintain a strong, clear, and accurate signal. So, while wires may be simple in low-frequency designs, at RF frequencies, careful design of transmission lines is crucial to ensure the signal works appropriately.
Another phenomenon that changes between low frequency and RF is what's known as the skin effect. The electrical current flows uniformly throughout the conductor (whether a wire or a trace) at DC and low frequencies. The current spreads across the wire using all the material for its path. As a result, there is very little resistance to the current, allowing the signal to move through quickly. However, at RF frequencies, the skin effect occurs. One of the best definitions I have heard for the skin effect is that the signal moves so fast that it has no time to "soak" into the trace or, more accurately, the transmission line. This causes the current to concentrate more at the outer surface of the conductor rather than flowing evenly through the entire conductor. The high-frequency signal generates a magnetic field around the conductor, causing the current to flow to the surface. As a result, the effective area through which the current flows is much smaller. That leads to higher resistance because there is less space for the current to flow, which results in signal loss. The higher the frequency, the more pronounced the skin effect. For example, signals at higher RF frequencies can lose more power as they travel along the conductor.
To reduce this loss, engineers use several methods, including silver plating the conductors. Silver has lower resistance than copper, which helps to reduce signal loss. Another method uses wider traces on the PCB, which provide a larger surface area for the current to flow, thereby reducing the effects of skin effect. In extreme cases, engineers might even use hollow waveguides—specially designed tubes that allow signals to travel through them without losing as much power.
The last issue I want to examine is wave propagation. Signals don't just travel through wires or traces at RF frequencies like low frequencies. Instead, they behave like electromagnetic waves traveling through space. These waves move energy from one place to another and can spread or bounce off surfaces. As the signal travels along the traces on a PCB, it can lose strength, which is called signal degradation. This degradation occurs because the material used in the PCB (like FR4) isn't perfect. The PCB material absorbs some of the signal energy as it travels, which weakens the signal. Also, if the connections between the components or traces are not perfect, it can cause imperfect connections that disrupt the signal. At higher frequencies, the more sensitive signal is more quickly affected, making this issue more apparent.
PCB designers often choose materials with lower dielectric loss to reduce signal degradation at RF frequencies. Common materials like FR-4 can absorb some of the signal's energy, weakening it. Instead, designers might use Rogers or PTFE (Teflon), which has better electrical properties for high-frequency signals. These materials reduce energy loss and help maintain signal strength. Additionally, high-frequency laminates are designed to minimize signal attenuation and offer better impedance control. Using these materials ensures the signal travels more efficiently with less interference, making them essential in RF PCB design to maintain clear communication.
Just like an airplane needs a glide slope to descend safely to the runway, RF design requires careful planning and control to ensure signals reach their destination without interference or loss. In both cases, the goal is to maintain smooth and controlled movement. In RF design, this means managing factors such as impedance matching, skin effect, and antenna behavior to prevent the signal from deviating from its intended course. RF signals can radiate uncontrollably without a proper glide path, causing interference or losing power, much like a plane veering off its intended path. By employing strategies such as ground planes, shielding, and trace optimization, designers can ensure that the signal arrives strongly and clearly, like an aircraft landing smoothly on the runway. Both require careful attention to detail, ensuring everything works together to achieve the desired outcome.
John Watson is a professor at Palomar College, San Marcos, California.
More Columns from Elementary, Mr. Watson
Elementary Mr. Watson: Ensuring a Smooth Handoff From PCB Design to FabricationElementary, Mr. Watson From Classroom to Career—Bridging the Gap in PCB Design Talent
Elementary Mr. Watson: The Road Ahead—Advances in PCB Design Technology
Elementary Mr. Watson: How to Reinvent Your Professional Journey
Elementary, Mr. Watson: Rules of Thumb—Guidelines vs. Principles for PCB Design
Elementary, Mr. Watson A Designer's Dilemma—Metric or Imperial Units?
Elementary, Mr. Watson: The Gooey Centers of Hybrid PCB Designs
Elementary, Mr. Watson: The Paradigm Shift of Silicon-to-System Design