Patricia (Patty) Goldman Inducted into IPC Hall of Fame
March 18, 2016 | Barry Matties, I-Connect007Estimated reading time: 10 minutes
I've seen some things over the years. When I first started, the industry with the strongest influence in IPC was the military. There were also a lot of captive shops—GE, IBM, AT&T’s Western Electric, many others. All the big companies had captive shops and oftentimes, multiple shops. Then that started to change, and they became less influential and the commercial companies became more influential. Eventually, all the big guys realized they didn't need to have their captive shops. They were always behind in the technology anyhow, at those captive shops. You’d think they wouldn't be, but they were behind in technology. Sounds counter-intuitive but that’s what I saw.
Matties: I thought the R&D was coming out of the captive shops.
Goldman: They had blinders on. Many did have their own R&D, which was perhaps best practice or perhaps not. But they didn’t really have to compete, so they weren’t constantly looking for the best technology, and then there was the NIH factor (“not invented here”). I could tell you a lot of stories. Maybe not best practice, but it was their way of doing it.
Matties: I understand what you're saying. It was good for them, but not necessarily good for the industry.
Goldman: Yeah. I was in a shop out in Ohio, NCR, when they still had a circuit board operation, and they were using this make-and-dump electroless copper bath. They would dump it every day! I thought, that's at least 20 years behind the times. They just had their own way of doing things, and they were not forced to change because they had a captive customer—themselves. They did not have to work to be more efficient and look for better ways of doing things. And it really wasn’t good for them either.
Matties: So here you are, 30+ years later, and you are now being inducted into the IPC Hall of Fame, and receiving that award. Additionally, I think you are the first female recipient of this award. Now that you've done that, what are you going to do next? Go to Disneyland?
Goldman: No, I’m a bigger fan of Disney World anyhow, as you know. [laughs] It is such an honor. But every time you receive an award from IPC, they put you back to work. When I got the President's Award in 1984, Don Dinella, Mr. Additive Circuits, said to me, "Now they'll really put you to work!" It's true. They do tend to tap the people that they know will get things done—why not?
So now I am thinking, this is a big one; they're really going to be tapping me for something or other. I know they call the Hall of Fame people “ambassadors.” I'll find out what that's all about.
Matties: I'm sure you will.
Goldman: One interesting thing I learned while I was TAEC Chairman, which I didn't realize before. IPC has its board of directors, of course, but the chair of TAEC is in on some of the meetings that involve giving direction to IPC. You represent all the chairs who represent all of the committees, which are of course the lifeblood of IPC. That was really interesting.
Matties: Well congratulations, Patty. This is great news and I’m happy to see you receive this award.
Goldman: It still seems kind of unreal, but such a huge honor. It seems a little unreal to me because of all of the people that have received this before me. All but the first two I know or have known pretty well—they are people I have always looked up to, that have done so much for the industry and have influenced so much. Several I would consider mentors, including Bernie Kessler, Don Dinella and Dieter Bergman. So I'm thinking, me? Really? Are you sure? Do I really fit into this august group? I hope I can live up to the examples set by those already in the Hall of Fame.
Matties: It was and is you, so congratulations. You deserve it.
Goldman: Thank you.
Matties: Are there any closing thoughts that you want to share with the industry?
Goldman: I've been asked to say a few words when I am inducted on Tuesday, and one of the big things I want to say, and we say it all the time, is to volunteer, to work on a committee or subcommittee. Don't just sit in a room and listen, but actually get involved. Not only can you help write and develop a standard that is important to you, but you can actually participate and have an effect and influence on how things are done and written.
If you're a passive bystander type person, you may learn some things, but you won't learn nearly as much as you can by getting involved, and of course, it just has so many benefits for you and your company.
Matties: Great. Again, congratulations, and thank you so much, Patty.
Goldman: Thanks. I am truly honored.
Page 2 of 2Suggested Items
Unlocking Advanced Circuitry Through Liquid Metal Ink
10/31/2024 | I-Connect007 Editorial TeamPCB UHDI technologist John Johnson of American Standard Circuits discusses the evolving landscape of electronics manufacturing and the critical role of innovation, specifically liquid metal ink technology, as an alternate process to traditional metallization in PCB fabrication to achieve ever finer features and tighter tolerances. The discussion highlights the benefits of reliability, efficiency, and yields as a tradeoff to any increased cost to run the process. As this technology becomes better understood and accepted, even sought out by customers and designers, John says there is a move toward mainstream incorporation.
Fresh PCB Concepts: The Critical Nature of Copper Thickness on PCBs
10/31/2024 | Team NCAB -- Column: Fresh PCB ConceptsPCBs are the backbone of modern electronics and the copper layers within these boards serve as the primary pathways for electrical signals. When designing and manufacturing PCBs, copper thickness is one of the most critical factors and significantly affects the board’s performance and durability. The IPC-6012F specification, the industry standard for the performance and qualification of rigid PCBs, sets clear guidelines on copper thickness to ensure reliability in different environments and applications.
Book Excerpt: The Printed Circuit Designer’s Guide to... DFM Essentials, Ch. 1
10/25/2024 | I-Connect007The guidelines offered in this book are based on both ASC recommendations and IPC standards with the understanding that some may require adjustment based on the material set, fabricator processes, and other design constraints. This chapter details high-frequency materials, copper foil types, metal core PCBs, and the benefits of embedded capacitance and resistor materials in multilayer PCBs.
The Cost-Benefit Analysis of Direct Metallization
10/21/2024 | Carmichael Gugliotti, MacDermid AlphaCarmichael Gugliotti of MacDermid Alpha discusses the innovative realm of direct metallization technology, its numerous applications, and significant advantages over traditional processes. Carmichael offers an in-depth look at how direct metallization, through developments such as Blackhole and Shadow, is revolutionizing PCB manufacturing by enhancing efficiency, sustainability, and cost-effectiveness. From its origins in the 1980s to its application in cutting-edge, high-density interconnects and its pivotal role in sustainability, this discussion sheds light on how direct metallization shapes the future of PCB manufacturing across various industries, including automotive, consumer electronics, and beyond.
Connect the Dots: Designing for Reality—Pattern Plating
10/16/2024 | Matt Stevenson -- Column: Connect the DotsIn the previous episode of I-Connect007’s On the Line with… podcast, we painted the picture of the outer layer imaging process. Now we are ready for pattern plating, where fabrication can get tricky. The board is now ready to receive the copper traces, pads, and other elements specified in the original CAD design. This article will lay out the pattern plating process and discuss constraints in the chemistries that must be properly managed to meet the customer's exacting manufacturing tolerances.