Happy’s Essential Skills: Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
April 6, 2016 | Happy HoldenEstimated reading time: 12 minutes
In simple terms, the FMEA process attempts to list every failure mode of each component of a system, and to predict its effect on system operation. Failure effects can be considered at more than one level (e.g., effects at the subsystem or overall system levels).
FMEA can be accomplished using either a component or functional approach. In the component approach, actual failure modes are listed (e.g., resistor open, bearing seizure). The functional approach is used when the details of the design are not yet fully defined. In this approach, function failures are considered (e.g., no feedback, memory lost). FMEA can also be performed using a combination of component and functional approaches. The failure mode is the symptom of the failure, as distinct from the cause of the failure, which consists of the proved reasons for the existence of the symptoms. Reliability aspects of the components must be considered in this process. FMEA requires inputs from hardware, software, systems, customer service, and manufacturing in assessing component failures, effects at higher levels of the system, fault detection, and in evaluating failure compensating provisions in the design.
Procedure
FMEA should be performed by a team of people having broad knowledge of the system's design and application. All available information on the design should be obtained: external and internal reference specifications, schematics, computer-aided design (CAD) data, stress analysis, reliability prediction data, test results, etc.
A system functional block diagram and reliability block diagram (Figure 1) should be prepared, as these are important for preparing the FMEA, and for understanding the completed analysis. All possible operating modes of the system and their functional relationships should be considered in the analysis. If the system has redundancy, it should also be considered by evaluating the effects of failure modes assuming the redundant system may or may not function.
Figure 1: Reliability block diagram examples.
FMEA can be performed from different points of view, such as failure detectability, safety, repair cost, availability, etc. The customer's point of view should always be first, in order to improve customer satisfaction with the final product. The viewpoint being considered should be consistent throughout a particular analysis, in order to assign proper criticality values. A hierarchical approach works well with systems, using a component approach at the lowest assembly level, and a functional approach to combine the effects of various subsystems. This also allows the FMEA to be performed even when some subsystems are not yet completely designed.
If CAD has been used on parts of the system, the FMEA can utilize that capability to simulate the effects of various failure modes. Such an analysis can greatly enhance the accuracy and objectivity of the FMEA process.
FMEA Process
FMEA is an ongoing process which should be started as soon as initial design information is available. It should be updated and enhanced as the design evolves, so that the analysis can be used to improve the design. All possible design alternatives should be analyzed separately, so that the effect on system performance and reliability can be considered in deciding which option to implement. Test results should be used later to update the analysis.
Requirements to Perform FMEA
- A team of people with a commitment to improve the ability of the design to meet the customer's needs
- Schematics and block diagrams of each level of the system, from subassemblies to complete system
- Component specifications, parts lists and design data
- Functional specifications of modules, subassemblies, etc.
- Design manuals
- Manufacturing requirements and details of the processes to be used
- FMEA forms and a list of any special considerations, such as safety or regulatory, that are applicable to this product
Page 2 of 5
Suggested Items
Cadence AI Autorouter May Transform the Landscape
06/19/2025 | Andy Shaughnessy, Design007 MagazinePatrick Davis, product management director with Cadence Design Systems, discusses advancements in autorouting technology, including AI. He emphasizes a holistic approach that enhances placement and power distribution before routing. He points out that younger engineers seem more likely to embrace autorouting, while the veteran designers are still wary of giving up too much control. Will AI help autorouters finally gain industry-wide acceptance?
Beyond Design: The Metamorphosis of the PCB Router
06/18/2025 | Barry Olney -- Column: Beyond DesignThe traditional PCB design process is often time-consuming and labor-intensive. Routing a complex PCB layout can consume up to 30% of a designer’s time, and addressing this issue is not straightforward. We have all encountered this scenario: You spend hours setting the constraints and finally hit the Go button, only to be surprised by the lack of visual appeal and the obvious flaws in the result.
Robust AI Demand Drives 6% QoQ Growth in Revenue for Top 10 Global IC Design Companies in 1Q25
06/15/2025 | TrendForceTrendForce’s latest investigations reveal that 1Q25 revenue for the global IC design industry reached US$77.4 billion, marking a 6% QoQ increase and setting a new record high. This growth was fueled by early stocking ahead of new U.S. tariffs on electronics and the ongoing construction of AI data centers around the world, which sustained strong chip demand despite the traditional off-season.
Cadence Advances Design and Engineering for Europe’s Manufacturers on NVIDIA Industrial AI Cloud
06/13/2025 | Cadence Design Systems, Inc.At NVIDIA GTC Paris, Cadence announced it is providing optimized solutions for the world’s first industrial AI cloud in collaboration with NVIDIA.
Zuken Autorouters Embrace Collaborative AI
06/12/2025 | Andy Shaughnessy, Design007 MagazineMaybe you’ve never liked autorouters; if so, you’re not alone. As Andy Buja, Zuken’s technical account manager for PCB Solutions, admits, autorouters are not perfect. But today’s autorouters allow designers a greater level of control than ever before, especially routers that incorporate collaborative AI.