-
- News
- Books
Featured Books
- pcb007 Magazine
Latest Issues
Current IssueAdvancing the Advanced Materials Discussion
Moore’s Law is no more, and the advanced material solutions to grapple with this reality are surprising, stunning, and perhaps a bit daunting. Buckle up for a dive into advanced materials and a glimpse into the next chapters of electronics manufacturing.
Inventing the Future With SEL
Two years after launching its state-of-the-art PCB facility, SEL shares lessons in vision, execution, and innovation, plus insights from industry icons and technology leaders shaping the future of PCB fabrication.
Sales: From Pitch to PO
From the first cold call to finally receiving that first purchase order, the July PCB007 Magazine breaks down some critical parts of the sales stack. To up your sales game, read on!
- Articles
- Columns
- Links
- Media kit
||| MENU - pcb007 Magazine
Happy’s Essential Skills: Learning Theory/Learning Curves
June 1, 2016 | Happy HoldenEstimated reading time: 14 minutes
F =C2/C1 (1)
Where C1 is the initial average unit cost and C2 is the average unit cost for double the reference quantity.
From equation (1) it is evident that the higher the value of F, the less change in cost is to be expected due either to process maturity (automation, optimized setup, tooling, yields), or highly customized content, as might be expected from small lot quantities of complex rigid flex assemblies.
For an initial quantity Qo and a final quantity Q the number of “doublings” or fractions thereof for the total quantity produced is given by log(Q/Qo)/log(2). Therefore, the unit cost behavior as a function of quantity can be written as:
C = C1*(F/100) ^ (log(Q/Qo) / log(2)) (2a)
Where C is the unit cost after quantity Q units or lots, C1 is the first unit cost, and F is the experience factor in percent.
A value of 75 for F would be typical of very steep (fast) learning curves, in which process consolidation proceeds rapidly with corresponding reductions in changeover time, improvements in yields, etc. Equation (2a) is awkward to handle since the principal variable, Q, appears in the exponent. It can be rearranged (and simplified) by noting that in general a ^ log(b) is equivalent to b ^ log(a) since either expression can be written as e ^ [log(a)*log(b)]. An alternate and better form for equation (2a) is therefore:
C = C1*q ^ k (2b)
Where q = Q/Qo and k = log(F/100) / log(2)
The total cost, T, to produce a quantity Q units or lots can be obtained by integrating equation (2b) over the limits q = 0 to q = Q:
T = C1* q ^ kdq = C1*Q ^ (k+ 1)/(k+ 1) (3)
The average cost, a, per unit or lot quantity is the total cost divided by the quantity:
A = T/Q (4)
For processes where the experience factor is accurately known, the average cost is often used to quote a lot or piece price to be effective over the entire production. Suppose, for example, that a first lot of ten pieces is produced at a cost of $20.00 by a process with a known experience factor of 80%. What would be the predicted piece cost for 1,000 units? For F = 80%, k is found to be log (0.80)/log (2) = 20.3219, and for this case the “experience” quantity Q = 1,000/10 = 100.
Therefore:
C = 20.00*100 ^ (-0.3219) = 4.5412
So that at the end of the run the production cost has declined to $4.54 per lot. The total cost, from equation (3), becomes:
T = 20*100 ^ (0.6781)/0.6781 = 669.7274
The average production cost per unit quantity (1 lot) is therefore T/Q = $6.70 and the piece cost is about $0.67. This approach can be used to create log-log plots for various experience factors, giving unit costs as a function of quantities and initial costs. For example, a process with 80% experience factor and an initial cost of 1.00 per unit can expect unit costs to decline to about 0.11 by the time 1,024 (2 ^ 10) units have been produced. This not atypical of the semiconductor industry, where F may be 75% or even less. At the other end of the scale a complex, low volume product may be 90% or higher. One-offs with highly customized assemblies will be as high as 100%: the product lifetime is too short (one-off) and the standardized process component(s) are too limited to offer meaningful improvement opportunities.
New Technologies—the Experience Factor[1]
To use this analysis for new technologies it is necessary to determine the experience factor. This can done using a broader experience base than the simple doubling shown in equation (1) by flipping equation (2a) around [. . .] [LL1] provided the data are available, specifically:
F = 10 ^ (log(2)*log(C/C1) /log(Q)) (5)
If the production cost of a metal-core type insulated metal substrate LED multichip board was 2.00 when 10,000 pieces had been produced (C1) and the cost (C) is now 0.65 when 4,000,000 have been produced (Q = 400), what is the experience factor F?
F = 10 ^ (log(2)*log(0.65/2.00)/log(400))
Or: F = 0.878
What will be the cost for the 20,000,000th piece when Q will be effectively 2,000 (20,000,000/10,000)?
k = log(0:878)/log(2) = 20:18771
C = 2.00*2000 ^ (20.18771) = 0.4801
This example assumes a limited degree of process innovation is necessary in the introduction of a new layout for the same function/substrate. As is often the case in printed circuit manufacturing, where the emphasis is less on products and more on capabilities built on standardized processes, the experience factor may be even higher than 88%. It is important to remember that the experience factor “F” does not imply any particular degree of expertise or mastery of the technology. It is simply an index of the expected stability of processing costs over the lifetime of the design.
References
- Burr, W., Pearne, N., “Learning curve theory and innovation,” Circuit World, Vol. 39, Issue 4, 2003, pp 169–173.
- Transformative Learning (Jack Mezirow)
- www.wikipedia.org
- The Quintessential of Generative Learning Theory
- The Learning Curve or Experience Curve, provided by James Martin.
Happy Holden has worked in printed circuit technology since 1970 with Hewlett-Packard, NanYa/Westwood, Merix, Foxconn and Gentex. Currently, he is the co-editor, with Clyde Coombs, of the Printed Circuit Handbook, 7th Ed. To contact Holden, click here.
Page 2 of 2Testimonial
"We’re proud to call I-Connect007 a trusted partner. Their innovative approach and industry insight made our podcast collaboration a success by connecting us with the right audience and delivering real results."
Julia McCaffrey - NCAB GroupSuggested Items
Sustainability and Selective Soldering
09/15/2025 | Dr. Samuel J. McMaster, Pillarhouse InternationalSustainability is more than just a buzzword for the electronics industry; it’s a key goal for all manufacturing processes. This is more than a box-ticking exercise or simply doing a small part for environmentally friendly processes. Moving toward sustainable solutions drives innovation and operational efficiency.
Trouble in Your Tank: Implementing Direct Metallization in Advanced Substrate Packaging
09/15/2025 | Michael Carano -- Column: Trouble in Your TankDirect metallization systems based on conductive graphite are gaining popularity throughout the world. The environmental and productivity gains achievable with this process are outstanding. Direct metallization reduces the costs of compliance, waste treatment, and legal issues related to chemical exposure. A graphite-based direct plate system has been devised to address these needs.
EV Group Achieves Breakthrough in Hybrid Bonding Overlay Control for Chiplet Integration
09/12/2025 | EV GroupEV Group (EVG), a leading provider of innovative process solutions and expertise serving leading-edge and future semiconductor designs and chip integration schemes, today unveiled the EVG®40 D2W—the first dedicated die-to-wafer overlay metrology platform to deliver 100 percent die overlay measurement on 300-mm wafers at high precision and speeds needed for production environments. With up to 15X higher throughput than EVG’s industry benchmark EVG®40 NT2 system designed for hybrid wafer bonding metrology, the new EVG40 D2W enables chipmakers to verify die placement accuracy and take rapid corrective action, improving process control and yield in high-volume manufacturing (HVM).
Integrating Uniplate PLBCu6 With the Digital Factory Suite
09/12/2025 | Giovanni Obino and Andreas Schatz, MKS' AtotechPrinted circuit board manufacturing is rapidly changing, driven by miniaturization, stringent reliability requirements, and growing pressure for sustainable production. Meeting these challenges requires more than incremental improvements; it demands a combination of precise equipment and real-time process intelligence. The pairing of Uniplate® PLBCu6 with the Digital Factory Suite (DFS) demonstrates how hardware and software can work together to create more responsive, resource-efficient manufacturing.
Closing the Loop on PCB Etching Waste
09/09/2025 | Shawn Stone, IECAs the PCB industry continues its push toward greener, more cost-efficient operations, Sigma Engineering’s Mecer System offers a comprehensive solution to two of the industry’s most persistent pain points: etchant consumption and rinse water waste. Designed as a modular, fully automated platform, the Mecer System regenerates spent copper etchants—both alkaline and acidic—and simultaneously recycles rinse water, transforming a traditionally linear chemical process into a closed-loop system.