-
- News
- Books
Featured Books
- smt007 Magazine
Latest Issues
Current IssueComing to Terms With AI
In this issue, we examine the profound effect artificial intelligence and machine learning are having on manufacturing and business processes. We follow technology, innovation, and money as automation becomes the new key indicator of growth in our industry.
Box Build
One trend is to add box build and final assembly to your product offering. In this issue, we explore the opportunities and risks of adding system assembly to your service portfolio.
IPC APEX EXPO 2024 Pre-show
This month’s issue devotes its pages to a comprehensive preview of the IPC APEX EXPO 2024 event. Whether your role is technical or business, if you're new-to-the-industry or seasoned veteran, you'll find value throughout this program.
- Articles
- Columns
Search Console
- Links
- Events
||| MENU - smt007 Magazine
Chapter 1 Excerpt: The Printed Circuit Assembler’s Guide to Process Validation
December 31, 2020 | Graham Naisbitt, Gen3 SystemsEstimated reading time: 2 minutes
Quick and Convenient Contamination Testing
The original principle underlying the IPC’s ionic cleanliness requirement was that the mobility of surface ions, detectable from SIR measurements, would correlate to a maximum value of detectable ionic elements permissible on the circuit surface.
The industry required a test that was both fast and accurate for process control. Thus, a simplified ion chromatograph that was able to detect ionic elements without differentiation was created. Due to patent restrictions, there were—and still are—only two different instrument configurations: closed-loop and open-loop, which became referred to as static and dynamic instruments. Each instrument configuration must be capable of measuring the presence of a known amount of ionic contamination.
Based on an extrapolation of insulation resistance measurements, it was determined that there was an upper limit beyond which ionic elements would become mobile on the assembly surface, thereby potentially compromising electrochemical reliability. The number, although occasionally altered during the infancy of this test, was 1.56 µg/cm² NaCl equivalence. Despite the many technology changes employed in the period after the mid-1970s, many—if not most—felt it convenient to simply continue applying this rule as adequate evidence of the electrochemical reliability of their end-product.
The IPC has now withdrawn the requirement for 1.56 µg/cm² NaCl equivalence for a number of reasons as explained in IPC-WP-019A, which states, “For many years, military (e.g., MIL-STD-2000) and commercial (e.g., IPC-J-STD-001) manufacturing standards have required manufactured circuit card assemblies (CCAs) to meet an ionic cleanliness requirement of 1.56 microgram (µg) of sodium chloride (NaCl) equivalence per square centimetre (cm2) of extracted surface, using resistivity of solvent extract (ROSE) testing per IPC-TM-650, method 2.3.25.”
Therefore, it is the position of the IPC committees that the value of 1.56 µg NaCl equivalence per square centimetre should be considered as obsolete for the following seven reasons:
- This test methodology was originally developed in the 1970s. It was never intended to be used as a cleanliness test, nor as a test for product acceptability; it was only intended to be used as a process control method.
- The use of the ionic contamination value as a measure of product acceptance was the result of a U.S. Department of Defense desire to implement pass/fail criteria.
- This ionic contamination value, and those derived from them, were originally developed for high solids (35% solids) rosin fluxes and ozone-depleting chemical (ODC) cleaning. The flux chemistries and cleaning solutions used today are completely different from those used when the ROSE limits were established.
- Modern assemblies are simply too complex in terms of residues to have a single “one-size-fits-all” cleanliness criterion.
- There is mounting evidence that as CCA component density increases, so does the sensitivity of the circuit to ionic contamination. Modern circuit assemblies have far greater component densities than found in the 1970s. This also means that residues that had minimal impact on component technologies from the 1970s can now have a significant impact on component reliability.
- For many assemblies, ROSE testing is no longer a sufficient test regimen to adequately predict acceptable levels of ionic residues. IPC has compiled a list of technical presentations showing the inadequacy of ROSE to predict ionic residues for high-performance electronics.
- It is recognized that ionic residue testing is critical for reliable circuit function, so the ROSE test has continued in use until a more suitable alternative can be identified and implemented.
To download The Printed Circuit Assembler’s Guide to Process Validation, click here. You can also view other titles in our full library.
To view the Gen3 roundtable on the PICT standard, click here.
Suggested Items
Zentech First to Adopt IPC Apprenticeship National Program Standards
05/20/2024 | Cory Blaylock, IPCIPC achieved a landmark in 2023 by creating an apprenticeship program approved by the U.S. Department of Labor. With such a registered framework in place, industry can work through IPC to secure local, state, and federal dollars for workforce development in a way they’ve never been able to do before. Zentech Manufacturing, headquartered in Baltimore, Maryland, with production facilities in Bloomington, Illinois, and Richardson, Texas, is the first employer partner to adopt IPC’s national program. Click here to read their story.
I-Connect007 Editor’s Choice: Five Must-Reads for the Week
05/17/2024 | Andy Shaughnessy, Design007 MagazineThis week, trade shows are at the top of our feed, with our coverage of the Del Mar Electronics and Manufacturing Show and IPC APEX EXPO. These two longtime events are almost polar opposites in size and scope, but Del Mar seems to be expanding from its roots as a “neighborhood gathering” with its move into the Del Mar Fairgrounds. The Del Mar show always has a good “buzz factor,” which is something you can’t buy.
IPC APEX EXPO: Some Thoughts About Growth
05/16/2024 | Dan Feinberg, I-Connect007After two and a half days of wandering the aisles at IPC APEX EXPO 2024, for the first time, I almost felt like I was exploring CES. There were so many booths and exhibits that I could describe, but I’d like to focus on the growth and huge value of this event, which has expanded well beyond just the growing and impressive exhibit show floor.
IPC Raymond E. Pritchard Hall of Fame Award: Pierre-Jean Albrieux
05/10/2024 | Marcy LaRont, PCB007 MagazineCongratulations to Pierre-Jean Albrieux, who received the 2024 IPC Raymond E. Pritchard Hall of Fame Award. The award is given to individuals in recognition of the highest level of achievement, extraordinary contributions, and distinguished service to IPC and toward the advancement of the industry, including helping to create a spirit of mutual esteem, respect, and recognition among members consistent with the goals and mission of IPC.
IPC Focuses on Education and Onboarding
05/09/2024 | Andy Shaughnessy, Design007 MagazineI recently spoke with Carlos Plaza, senior director of education for IPC, about expanding educational efforts in the PCB design, fabrication, and assembly segments. As Carlos explains, PCB design is a hot topic, but onboarding may be the hottest one of all.