Beyond Design: High-speed Rules of Thumb
Global PCB Connections: A Technical Overview of Long-flex Printed Circuit Boards
The Shaughnessy Report: A Handy Look at Rules of Thumb
Why We Simulate
April 29, 2021 | Bill Hargin, Z-zeroEstimated reading time: 1 minute
When I was cutting my teeth in high-speed PCB design some 25 years ago, speeds were slow, layer counts were low, dielectric constants and loss tangents were high, design margins were wide, copper roughness didn’t matter, and glass-weave styles didn’t matter. We called dielectrics “FR-4” and their properties didn’t matter much. A fast PCI bus operated at just 66 MHz.
As speeds increased in the 1990s and beyond, PCB fabricators acquired software tools for designing stackups and dialing in target impedances. In the process, they would acquire PCB laminate libraries, providing proposed stackups to their OEM customers late in the design process, including material thicknesses, copper thickness, dielectric constant, and trace widths—all weeks or months after initial signal-integrity simulation and analysis should have taken place.
Speeds continued to increase in the 2000s; design margins continued to tighten, and OEM engineers began tracking signals in millivolts (mV) and picoseconds (ps). Figure 1 illustrates these trends starting in 2000, emphasizing the trajectory of PCI Express trajectory, from PCIe 3.0 in 2010 to PCIe 6.0, which is just on the doorstep.
In webinars and training events I often pose this question: “Why do we simulate?” I ask because the answers tell me a lot about the audience, and some wise older person long ago told me and my fellow students to “always know your audience.”
When I ask that, I get answers like faster signaling speeds, calculating impedance or loss, opening eyes and avoiding inter-symbol interference, controlling crosstalk, etc. These are all good answers, but a bit on the periphery in my view.
One astute signal integrity practitioner offered that we simulate for only two reasons:
- To make design decisions (i.e., evaluate tradeoffs during design).
- To verify a design before manufacturing (verification).
The only question that designers really care about is, “Will it work and by how much?” This implies that the simulation should be able to produce tangible metrics that can be related to design success or failure. Fair enough.
This is a good description for “why we simulate,” but so far, I’ve never heard anyone mention the most fundamental reason, in my opinion, for signal integrity (SI) or power integrity (PI) simulation: To predict the negative impact that the physical world has on the electrical world, and to mitigate or prevent the negative effects proactively.
To read this entire article, which appeared in the April 2021 issue of Design007 Magazine, click here.
Share on:
Suggested Items
Unlocking Advanced Circuitry Through Liquid Metal Ink
10/31/2024 | I-Connect007 Editorial TeamPCB UHDI technologist John Johnson of American Standard Circuits discusses the evolving landscape of electronics manufacturing and the critical role of innovation, specifically liquid metal ink technology, as an alternate process to traditional metallization in PCB fabrication to achieve ever finer features and tighter tolerances. The discussion highlights the benefits of reliability, efficiency, and yields as a tradeoff to any increased cost to run the process. As this technology becomes better understood and accepted, even sought out by customers and designers, John says there is a move toward mainstream incorporation.
Fresh PCB Concepts: The Critical Nature of Copper Thickness on PCBs
10/31/2024 | Team NCAB -- Column: Fresh PCB ConceptsPCBs are the backbone of modern electronics and the copper layers within these boards serve as the primary pathways for electrical signals. When designing and manufacturing PCBs, copper thickness is one of the most critical factors and significantly affects the board’s performance and durability. The IPC-6012F specification, the industry standard for the performance and qualification of rigid PCBs, sets clear guidelines on copper thickness to ensure reliability in different environments and applications.
Book Excerpt: The Printed Circuit Designer’s Guide to... DFM Essentials, Ch. 1
10/25/2024 | I-Connect007The guidelines offered in this book are based on both ASC recommendations and IPC standards with the understanding that some may require adjustment based on the material set, fabricator processes, and other design constraints. This chapter details high-frequency materials, copper foil types, metal core PCBs, and the benefits of embedded capacitance and resistor materials in multilayer PCBs.
The Cost-Benefit Analysis of Direct Metallization
10/21/2024 | Carmichael Gugliotti, MacDermid AlphaCarmichael Gugliotti of MacDermid Alpha discusses the innovative realm of direct metallization technology, its numerous applications, and significant advantages over traditional processes. Carmichael offers an in-depth look at how direct metallization, through developments such as Blackhole and Shadow, is revolutionizing PCB manufacturing by enhancing efficiency, sustainability, and cost-effectiveness. From its origins in the 1980s to its application in cutting-edge, high-density interconnects and its pivotal role in sustainability, this discussion sheds light on how direct metallization shapes the future of PCB manufacturing across various industries, including automotive, consumer electronics, and beyond.
Connect the Dots: Designing for Reality—Pattern Plating
10/16/2024 | Matt Stevenson -- Column: Connect the DotsIn the previous episode of I-Connect007’s On the Line with… podcast, we painted the picture of the outer layer imaging process. Now we are ready for pattern plating, where fabrication can get tricky. The board is now ready to receive the copper traces, pads, and other elements specified in the original CAD design. This article will lay out the pattern plating process and discuss constraints in the chemistries that must be properly managed to meet the customer's exacting manufacturing tolerances.