-
-
News
News Highlights
- Books
Featured Books
- design007 Magazine
Latest Issues
Current IssueAll About That Route
Most designers favor manual routing, but today's interactive autorouters may be changing designers' minds by allowing users more direct control. In this issue, our expert contributors discuss a variety of manual and autorouting strategies.
Creating the Ideal Data Package
Why is it so difficult to create the ideal data package? Many of these simple errors can be alleviated by paying attention to detail—and knowing what issues to look out for. So, this month, our experts weigh in on the best practices for creating the ideal design data package for your design.
Designing Through the Noise
Our experts discuss the constantly evolving world of RF design, including the many tradeoffs, material considerations, and design tips and techniques that designers and design engineers need to know to succeed in this high-frequency realm.
- Articles
- Columns
- Links
- Media kit
||| MENU - design007 Magazine
Material Conservation Demands Stakeholder Buy-in
August 10, 2022 | I-Connect007 Editorial TeamEstimated reading time: 3 minutes

With the supply chain problem showing no signs of letting up, the idea of designing PCBs with fewer materials has begun to take hold. So, as we mapped out this issue on conserving materials, we knew it was important to hear from Happy Holden about this topic. Here’s why:
Happy has been a proponent of cost-aware PCB design for decades. At HP, Happy helped develop the relative cost index (RCI), which allows PCB designers to compare the costs of PCB structures and their alternatives. With this in mind, we spoke with Happy about the potential benefits of designing for material conservation, and why many of the old design concepts may be ripe for updating, such as the 0.062" board.
Barry Matties: Happy, in the past you mentioned that 75% to 80% of the cost of the board is controlled by design and just 20% by the fabricator. To help designers control cost, you developed a relative cost index. Tell us about that.
Happy Holden: We came up with the relative cost index because it was almost impossible to get fabricators to provide cost predictors. First, they didn't want to have people hold their feet to the fire in case you left something out. Second, they were unsure if the information would get out to their competitors. So, we came up with the relative cost index. It allows you to compare architecture design alternatives as a percent savings or percent increase in cost from that fabricator. It doesn't give you the absolute value, although the RCIs are calculated based on the costs of a conventional eight-layer FR-4 through-hole multilayer PCB.
Matties: So, you have a benchmark board, and then you're either adding or subtracting based off that benchmark.
Holden: In terms of percentages, not in terms of dollars. It’s only good for that fabricator because some other fabricator, depending on their eight-layer through-holes and what they charge, will have different RCIs. But at least RCIs give you some help in design when you're comparing alternatives.
Matties: Are the designers driven to reduce cost or conserve material, or are they just driven by schedule?
Holden: They're singularly driven by schedule.
Matties: Now with supply chain issues hitting, though, I would think that they have to now start thinking about reducing the number of materials they use in each PCB.
Holden: Ah, yes, and that's the big bugaboo. This came out of nothing, that now people who can't get to components, you've got to change this component, which changes its footprint, etc. The whole supply chain and virus lockdown has changed many rules, but nothing is available. Nobody was prepared for this. I've had that RCI chart out for 30 years now. Manufacturers actually like how bad designers are because that gives them a much greater profit. If designers were designing optimally, much of their extra profits would go away, so what's their incentive to educate the designer to do it better?
Matties: That's the question that's percolating in my mind. What's the incentive for the designer to conserve material?
Holden: Right now, his biggest incentive is getting his boards out, and figuring out what he’s going to do when fabricators come back with a huge increase in pricing on materials because of the scarcity.
Matties: Inflation is the driver, of course. We have to lower the cost by whatever means we have, because of supply chain issues. So, you have double incentive to create a shift in the paradigm.
Holden: Yes, but nobody teaches this. So, how does a designer learn this?
Dan Feinberg: Happy, I don't think that the design team's management rewards them for this sort of behavior.
Holden: Yes. It certainly will punish them if they don't meet the schedule, but it won’t necessarily reward them. You're right.
Matties: So, you fall back on tried-and-true methods. You just need to make sure that this is functional, rather than spending a lot of time saving the company money when there's little in it for you individually.
Holden: If you sandbag and over-design a board, it still works, and only its cost goes up. But if you're trying to minimize the cost, then you've taken on risk, in terms of meeting the schedule and everything else. You know how much everybody likes to avoid risk. The solution to risk aversion is just to make things more complicated and expensive. At least it won't come back to you.
To read this entire conversation, which appeared in the August issue of Design007 Magazine, click here.
Suggested Items
DownStream Acquisition Fits Siemens’ ‘Left-Shift’ Model
06/26/2025 | Andy Shaughnessy, I-Connect007I recently spoke to DownStream Technologies founder Joe Clark about the company’s acquisition by Siemens. We were later joined by A.J. Incorvaia, Siemens’ senior VP of electronic board systems. Joe discussed how he, Rick Almeida, and Ken Tepper launched the company in the months after 9/11 and how the acquisition came about. A.J. provides some background on the acquisition and explains why the companies’ tools are complementary.
Elementary Mr. Watson: Retro Routers vs. Modern Boards—The Silent Struggle on Your Screen
06/26/2025 | John Watson -- Column: Elementary, Mr. WatsonThere's a story about a young woman preparing a holiday ham. Before putting it in the pan, she cuts off the ends. When asked why, she shrugs and says, "That's how my mom always did it." She asks her mother, who gives the same answer. Eventually, the question reaches Grandma, who laughs and says, "Oh, I only cut the ends off because my pan was too small." This story is a powerful analogy for how many PCB designers approach routing today.
Siemens Turbocharges Semiconductor and PCB Design Portfolio with Generative and Agentic AI
06/24/2025 | SiemensAt the 2025 Design Automation Conference, Siemens Digital Industries Software today unveiled its AI-enhanced toolset for the EDA design flow.
Cadence AI Autorouter May Transform the Landscape
06/19/2025 | Andy Shaughnessy, Design007 MagazinePatrick Davis, product management director with Cadence Design Systems, discusses advancements in autorouting technology, including AI. He emphasizes a holistic approach that enhances placement and power distribution before routing. He points out that younger engineers seem more likely to embrace autorouting, while the veteran designers are still wary of giving up too much control. Will AI help autorouters finally gain industry-wide acceptance?
Beyond Design: The Metamorphosis of the PCB Router
06/18/2025 | Barry Olney -- Column: Beyond DesignThe traditional PCB design process is often time-consuming and labor-intensive. Routing a complex PCB layout can consume up to 30% of a designer’s time, and addressing this issue is not straightforward. We have all encountered this scenario: You spend hours setting the constraints and finally hit the Go button, only to be surprised by the lack of visual appeal and the obvious flaws in the result.