Beyond Design: Integrated Circuit to PCB Integration
The Shaughnessy Report: Silicon to Systems—The Walls Are Coming Down
Quiet Power: An Evolution in PCB Design CostsStop Over-specifying Your Materials
May 25, 2023 | I-Connect007 Editorial TeamEstimated reading time: 3 minutes
Columnist Kelly Dack has had a pretty wide range of experiences. As a PCB designer, he has sat behind the desk at an NPI company, an OEM, a fabricator, and now an EMS provider. We asked him to share a few thoughts on the materials selection process and how it could be improved.
Kelly also explains how overly zealous PCB designers make things too complicated by over-specifying their materials, which leads to confusion once the board goes to volume production overseas. Are you over-constraining your material choices?
Andy Shaughnessy: Kelly, what is your process for material selection? Walk us through it.
Kelly Dack: Sure. I actually wrote a guideline for our customers that explains the material selection process. As mentioned, over-specification in the EMS realm is rampant and problematic from the standpoint of scaling products to volume overseas. This guide has a section on laminated materials that includes a simple, tried-and-true material specification. It says, “Materials: laminated glass epoxy resin type FR-4 series or equivalent per IPC-4101 with a Tg of greater than or equal to xxx.” This is a number that we can modify. We say, for instance, 170°C, and a Td (time to delamination) temperature of greater than 3XX°C. Those are all movable numbers that designers can edit.
That’s how we specify our laminate materials for printed circuit boards, unless the performance criteria dictates that it needs to go further and get more specific—for example, high-performance signal integrity constraints, impedance control, or exotic materials. But otherwise, FR-4 laminates cover 85–95% of our customers’ design requirements.
Shaughnessy: Where do designers typically go to find this information? What documents or guidelines should they use?
Dack: Many designers use their company’s documentation template or go to their elders and learn through knowledge that has been passed down. I just went through a bunch of our customers’ designs and fabrication drawings, and I found plenty of examples of customer material specification. Many of them call out a specific IPC-4101 slash number, and it’s usually the same slash number each time. It’s either 4101/26 or /21.
Shaughnessy: IPC has said that slash sheets were not ever meant for designers to use; they’re mainly a way for PCB supplier purchasing and marketing departments to communicate with buyers.
Dack: I’m glad to hear that confirmation as it was my understanding as well. This all came from the MIL-S-13949 spec back in the mil-spec days, most of which has been replaced by IPC standards. But we are seeing some of our customers’ designs specifying laminates by using slash numbers and I get the feeling it’s just because of tribal knowledge. If you look at most of the designs, they appear to be basic, not really requiring a specific material. The board would work fine with a generic glass-epoxy laminate because it has no impedance control or performance criteria. We just print and etch some copper onto it, create a circuit, and it moves electrons.
It’s usually only when we get into the super high-speed design in the gigahertz range where we have to start thinking about loss tangents and permittivities. Here’s the challenge: How much do you constrain? If you’re building your PCB design down at the local prototype shop, which will build a board any way you want, everybody seems fat and happy. But when you want to build 1 million boards, you must introduce a low-cost constraint because you can’t pay $1,000 a board and make a profit. You scale to volume to get cost savings. To realize maximum cost savings, this has always been done offshore. But designers must realize that offshore suppliers don’t have access to all the materials and capabilities that U.S. prototype companies have. Over-specification of laminate materials by composition, performance characteristics, or a trademarked source creates a terrible, but avoidable ordering situation, putting quotes on hold every single day. The simple fact is that it causes our offshore PCB suppliers to request and obtain approval for material substitutions before they can proceed.
To read this entire conversation, which appeared in the May 2023 issue of Design007 Magazine, click here.
Share on:
Suggested Items
Trouble in Your Tank: Things You Can Do for Better Wet Process Control
09/11/2024 | Michael Carano -- Column: Trouble in Your TankFor 40 years, I have been involved in the printed circuit board, circuit board assembly, and semiconductor technology segments, preaching about minimizing defects and improving yields. This is especially true as technology becomes increasingly complex, and additional focus must be placed on yield improvements. Process management and wet process control must be front and center, so it’s quite interesting and timely to talk about wet process control and management for this month’s issue. This theme fits quite well with today's global events. For this industry, the technical curve has steepened dramatically in the past few years.
Atotech to Participate at KPCA Show 2024
09/03/2024 | AtotechMKS’ Atotech will participate in this year’s KPCA Show 2024 in Incheon, held at Songdo Convensia from September 4-6, 2024.
Victory Announces Breakthrough in PCB Technology with New Product Launch
08/29/2024 | openPRShenzhen Victory Electronics Technology Co., Ltd., a leader in the printed circuit board (PCB) manufacturing industry, is proud to announce the successful development of a groundbreaking new product.
Connect the Dots: Designing for Reality—Electroless Copper
08/28/2024 | Matt Stevenson -- Column: Connect the DotsRoll up your sleeves because it's time to get messy. In a recent episode of I-Connect007’s On the Line with… podcast, we discussed electroless copper deposition. This process deposits a copper layer into the through-holes and vias of what will eventually be a PCB. Electroless copper deposition feels like a black box to many people. It sort of looks like a black box, too. The boards go in one side, come out the other, and emerge differently. So, let's crack open that black box and look inside.
Maximizing ROI Through Better Wet Process Control
08/20/2024 | I-Connect007 Editorial Team“When things get out of control, the variation in your wet process begins,” says Mike Carano,. “Just because they look like good boards and may even pass electrical test, it does not necessarily mean you have good boards. Once the chemistry is headed toward the right or left side of the process control parameter cliff, the plating is compromised. If the copper is thinner than it should be, when the customer puts it into service, the board may fail after 500 cycles vs. the requisite 1,000 or 2,000 cycles. The root cause issue is that you plated 7/10ths of a mil of copper instead of one-mil of copper because you were not controlling your process. The fact that you passed your own electric test becomes inconsequential.”