-
- News
- Books
Featured Books
- pcb007 Magazine
Latest Issues
Current IssueTechnology Roadmaps
In this issue of PCB007 Magazine, we discuss technology roadmaps and what they mean for our businesses, providing context to the all-important question: What is my company’s technology roadmap?
Wet Process Control
In this issue, we examine wet processes and how to obtain a better degree of control that allows usable data to guide our decisions and produce consistently higher-quality products.
Don’t Just Survive, Thrive
If we are to be relevant and prosper during these next critical decades in electronics, we must do more than survive. As an industry, we can and must thrive. In this issue, our contributors explore these concepts meant to help you take your business to the next level.
- Articles
- Columns
Search Console
- Links
- Events
||| MENU - pcb007 Magazine
From Silicon to Systems
September 10, 2024 | Andy Shaughnessy, Design007 MagazineEstimated reading time: 2 minutes
For the past few years, IPC has been championing the term “silicon to systems.” More than a buzzword, it has become a slogan—and even a kind of roadmap—for the organization. The term comes in especially handy when IPC is advocating for this industry in Washington, D.C., often addressing politicians who have little understanding of electronics technology.
But what does silicon to systems mean to PCB designers? We asked this and more of a trio of IPC staffers: CTO Matt Kelly, Chief Strategist for Advanced Packaging Devan Iyer, and design instructor Kris Moyer, CID+. Does your company take a silicon-to-systems approach to design?
Andy Shaughnessy: Matt, what do you mean by silicon to systems?
Matt Kelly: The term silicon to systems was born in our IPC Advanced Packaging report in the fall of 2021. It was a notion that I used to try to simplify the breadth and the scope of everything that was going on at the time, and is still going on today, of course. A lot of the focus with the CHIPS Act in the United States, Europe, and other geographies has really revolved around the step function changes that are occurring with semiconductors and electronics packaging. This comes out in terms of the U.S. CHIPS Act in the design of those chips, the architectures, and the fact that Moore's Law has been running out of economic steam for quite some time.
Silicon to systems was really a way for us to go beyond the discussion of just the semiconductor and the packaging of that chip. It's very important because everything follows silicon. We are at the beginning of a 10-plus-year period of significant disruption because of this technology change and adoption. Silicon to systems is basically a way of saying, “You don't hold a chip in your hand.” You don't even hold a component in your hand; you hold a cellphone in your hand, and for that system to work, while these components and changes are absolutely important, it's really just one part among many more that makes up the system you are using.
It’s basically about having a very circumspect view, not just looking at your own silo. From a design perspective, all these new systems can be across any application while they're being dreamt up by the OEMs, with increased functionality and density, and all these great things that we're trying to do all in single devices. This is really being powered by these chip technologies. I know Devan has a lot to say in this area as well.
Devan Iyer: Thanks, Matt. I think that's a good start. Speaking of silicon to systems, this also includes the non-silicon devices like gallium nitride. If you really look at high-speed devices or high-power devices like silicon carbide or EV automotive applications, they’re outside the domain of silicon, but you can call that chip to systems or silicon to systems. Semiconductor to systems might be a more accurate term.
To read the entire article, which originally published in the September 2024 Design007 Magazine, click here.
Suggested Items
Designer's Notebook: Heterogeneous Integration and High-density SiP Technologies
10/03/2024 | Vern Solberg -- Column: Designer's NotebookOften, our primary goal is to maximize product functionality without increasing product size. Developing a multifunction silicon-based semiconductor (system-on-chip) for a specific product application, however, requires a significant investment in both engineering and financial resources. The problem is that many of the newer generations of semiconductor die have actually increased in size, with higher I/O and terminal pitch variations that have become significantly smaller.
Silicon to Systems: Collaboration Between IC and PCB Design Continues
10/02/2024 | Andy Shaughnessy, Design007The walls are coming down between the designers of chips and PCBs. Because of the complexity of electronic systems, IC designers and PCB designers are increasingly finding themselves in need of information from technologists upstream and downstream, from silicon through the system level. Stephen Chavez, senior product marketing manager at Siemens, shares his thoughts on this silicon-to-systems approach and what it means for PCB designers, EDA tool providers, and system-level developers as well.
Silicon to Systems: A Wake-up Call for the Industry
09/26/2024 | Andy Shaughnessy, Design007 MagazineDuane Benson, founder of Positive Edge, has been working with silicon and packaging for longer than some of our newer readers have been alive. We asked him to share his thoughts on silicon to systems, which Duane says is much more than a buzzword—it’s a wake-up call for the industry.
Jabil Expands Silicon Photonics Capabilities to Enable Next-Generation AI and Data Center Technologies
09/26/2024 | JabilJabil Inc. a global leader in design, manufacturing, and supply chain solutions, announced its continued investment in silicon photonics-based products and capabilities to support the increasing demands of hyperscalers and next-wave cloud and AI data center growth.
Elementary, Mr. Watson: The Paradigm Shift of Silicon-to-System Design
09/18/2024 | John Watson -- Column: Elementary, Mr. WatsonImagine you were asked to build a city. What approach would you take? In the old way, city planners designed each building independently. They focused on making each building strong, aesthetically pleasing, and valuable. But they didn't always consider how all the buildings would fit together in the city. Roads, power lines, and parks were added later, sometimes making the city confusing or complicated to get around.