Powering the Future: When Material Choice Defines RF Performance
Learning with Leo: The Cost of Cleaning and Protecting the Ozone Layer
Nolan’s Notes: Cleaning With Smaller Geometries
Hermetic packages protect chips, lasers, and sensors from the outside world, but the cavity inside can still change after seal. Small amounts of water, hydrogen, carbon dioxide, and organic vapor may remain after build or may form later from adhesives, films, and other internal materials. Getters reduce that risk by creating a planned sink for those gases inside the package. When teams choose the right getter early, they hold the headspace steady, cut reliability escapes, and lower the life-cycle cost of a high-value device. That point matters most in medical, aerospace, telecommunications, photonics, and industrial programs, where one field return can cost far more than the getter.
Moisture Getters Matter in a Sealed Package
A device can pass a leak test and still drift over time. Leak testing shows that the seal is sound, but it does not prove that the headspace will stay stable for years. Internal materials can still release water or hydrogen after the package leaves the factory. That delayed gas load can raise dew point, drive corrosion, harm sensitive surfaces, and add performance spread that appears only after stress or aging. For that reason, moisture getters and getters for hermetic packages belong in the first design review, not in a late fix plan.
How Getters Work
Getters capture gases before they can harm the device or alter the cavity. Moisture getters often use porous structures and desiccant phases that bind water irreversibly. Hydrogen getters use reactive phases that first adsorb hydrogen at the surface, pull it into the bulk, and then trap it in a stable form. The exact chemistry changes by product, but the engineering goal stays the same. Lower the partial pressure of harmful species and keep the cavity stable through life.
For moisture control, the main goal is a low and steady dew point. Water in a hermetic cavity can condense on cold surfaces, lower insulation resistance, speed corrosion, and support dendritic growth under bias. Those effects become more serious as feature size shrinks and the product cycles between hot and cold conditions. A good moisture getter, therefore, needs enough capacity, uptake rate, and low outgassing, so it solves the problem without causing a new one.
For hydrogen control, the risk is different but just as real. Hydrogen can affect gallium arsenide devices, radio frequency structures, optical assemblies, and other sealed microelectronic systems. It can change device behavior, shorten life, and make root cause work harder because the package may still look sound. MacDermid Alpha's STAYDRY H2-3000PSA combines hydrogen gettering and moisture gettering in a flexible silicone film with pressure-sensitive adhesive backing. The technical data sheet states that the material is designed to maintain a dew point below -65°C and a hydrogen level below 1 part per million inside the device.
The key metrics are practical and easy to state. Engineers should look at capacity, uptake rate, selectivity, heat stability, outgassing profile, ionic cleanliness, and fit with nearby materials. In this setting, cleanliness means low total mass loss, low collected volatile condensable material, low ionic extractables, and stable behavior across the real process window. A getter that absorbs moisture, but sheds vapor, particles, or ionic residue can create as many problems as it solves.
Quality Assurance and Reliability Teams Care
The value of a getter becomes clear when failure modes are tied to headspace control:
- In optical transceivers, excess moisture can fog windows, contaminate light paths, and contribute to power drift.
- In image sensors, moisture can corrode aluminum bond pads, attack fine interconnects, or raise leakage across small features.
- In micro-electro-mechanical systems, unstable headspace can increase stiction, alter damping, and shift quality factor over life.
- In radio frequency and gallium arsenide devices, hydrogen can poison sensitive structures and reduce performance long after the package passes incoming inspection.
Quality teams also care because getters help close the gap between seal test and real use. A device may pass hermeticity screening under MIL-STD-883, Method 1014 (Seal), yet still gain moisture from internal materials during storage or stress tests. Residual gas analysis and internal vapor analysis help teams identify hidden drift, but the best results come when the package design limits drift in the first place. That is why the getter should appear in the control plan, the qualification matrix, and the device history record.
The best programs define acceptance limits before pilot build. Teams should set post-seal and post-stress limits for dew point, hydrogen level, and any other headspace species that matter to the device. They should also record getter batch or lot traceability, activation conditions, seal profile, residual gas analysis data, and stress results in one file. That habit improves audit readiness, reduces debate during failure review, and speeds the move from pilot to release.
A Practical Sizing Mindset
Getter choice should start with cavity volume, expected gas load, target life, and the worst heat profile the device will see. A small cavity with low organic content may need only modest moisture capacity, while a larger package with more polymeric material may need a much larger safety factor. Engineers do not need a perfect model to begin. They need a sound estimate, a clear derating rule, and a test plan that checks the estimate against data.
Consider this simple example. Assume a hermetic package has a cavity volume of 0.5 cubic centimeters and holds materials that can release both moisture and hydrogen during build and stress. If the design target calls for hydrogen below 1 part per million and a dew point below -65°C, the getter must hold enough capacity to absorb the gas load with margin. A conservative team may derate nominal capacity by a factor of two to five, based on confidence in the outgassing estimate, and then verify the result by residual gas analysis during thermal aging, highly accelerated stress testing, or temperature-humidity-bias exposure when that test fits the package.
This way of sizing matters because it moves the discussion from features to decisions. Instead of asking which getter sounds strongest, the team asks which format, thickness, and placement give the best chance of meeting headspace targets throughout life. That is the right question for design, sourcing, and reliability teams that must defend a qualification package.
Page 1 of 2
