-
- News
- Books
Featured Books
- I-Connect007 Magazine
Latest Issues
Current Issue
Beyond the Rulebook
What happens when the rule book is no longer useful, or worse, was never written in the first place? In today’s fast-moving electronics landscape, we’re increasingly asked to design and build what has no precedent, no proven path, and no tidy checklist to follow. This is where “Design for Invention” begins.
March Madness
From the growing role of AI in design tools to the challenge of managing cumulative tolerances, these articles in this issue examine the technical details, design choices, and manufacturing considerations that determine whether a board works as intended.
Looking Forward to APEX EXPO 2026
I-Connect007 Magazine previews APEX EXPO 2026, covering everything from the show floor to the technical conference. For PCB designers, we move past the dreaded auto-router and spotlight AI design tools that actually matter.
- Articles
- Columns
- Links
- Media kit
||| MENU - I-Connect007 Magazine
Estimated reading time: 1 minute
Are Boringly Predictable Operations Possible?
Self-help gurus like Tony Robbins claim that the more uncertainty and unpredictability we can tolerate in our lives, the greater our quality of life. But we don’t want uncertainty and unpredictability in our operations. Click here to see why not.
Without question, we have excelled at developing new technologies, new materials, and new processes, and we continue to do so. This is exciting, creative stuff where we thrive and appreciate the statement, “variety is the spice of life.” But, what we have grown to accept in our operations are the unpleasant surprises and problems that too many of us describe as “burning platforms.” Is there anything we can do with our operations to make them significantly more predictable? Or is our only strategy throwing darts at the wall?
A big part of making our operations more predictable is by being able to model and simulate our PCB plants. The ability to simulate our operations, like an airline pilot can in an aircraft simulator, would allow us to sharpen our skills, broaden our intuition, and develop and test new strategies, with the goal of achieving boringly predictable operations. As nice as this sounds, there are three reasons why modeling is often instantly rejected before a discussion can even start: 1) we don’t understand it; 2) we believe our operations are far too complex to be modeled; 3) nobody seems to have built a useful one in our industry (or has shared one publicly).
Read the full column here.
Editor's Note: This column originally appeared in the February 2014 issue of The PCB Magazine.
More Columns from Solving DAM Problems
Solving DAM Problems: Solving a True DAM ProblemSolving Dam Problems: Why Removing Your Bottleneck is a Bad Idea
Change Your DAM Thinking: Do We Need to be More Innovative?
Solving DAM Problems: Can Scrap be Beaten? A Strategy for 2014 and Beyond
Solving Dam Problems: How to Compute Your Plant's DAM Capacity
Solving DAM Problems: Standards are DAM Important!
Solving DAM Problems: What's the DAM Problem with Scheduling?
Solving Your DAM Problems: Examine Your DAM WIP