Happy’s Essential Skills: Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
April 6, 2016 | Happy HoldenEstimated reading time: 12 minutes
In simple terms, the FMEA process attempts to list every failure mode of each component of a system, and to predict its effect on system operation. Failure effects can be considered at more than one level (e.g., effects at the subsystem or overall system levels).
FMEA can be accomplished using either a component or functional approach. In the component approach, actual failure modes are listed (e.g., resistor open, bearing seizure). The functional approach is used when the details of the design are not yet fully defined. In this approach, function failures are considered (e.g., no feedback, memory lost). FMEA can also be performed using a combination of component and functional approaches. The failure mode is the symptom of the failure, as distinct from the cause of the failure, which consists of the proved reasons for the existence of the symptoms. Reliability aspects of the components must be considered in this process. FMEA requires inputs from hardware, software, systems, customer service, and manufacturing in assessing component failures, effects at higher levels of the system, fault detection, and in evaluating failure compensating provisions in the design.
Procedure
FMEA should be performed by a team of people having broad knowledge of the system's design and application. All available information on the design should be obtained: external and internal reference specifications, schematics, computer-aided design (CAD) data, stress analysis, reliability prediction data, test results, etc.
A system functional block diagram and reliability block diagram (Figure 1) should be prepared, as these are important for preparing the FMEA, and for understanding the completed analysis. All possible operating modes of the system and their functional relationships should be considered in the analysis. If the system has redundancy, it should also be considered by evaluating the effects of failure modes assuming the redundant system may or may not function.
Figure 1: Reliability block diagram examples.
FMEA can be performed from different points of view, such as failure detectability, safety, repair cost, availability, etc. The customer's point of view should always be first, in order to improve customer satisfaction with the final product. The viewpoint being considered should be consistent throughout a particular analysis, in order to assign proper criticality values. A hierarchical approach works well with systems, using a component approach at the lowest assembly level, and a functional approach to combine the effects of various subsystems. This also allows the FMEA to be performed even when some subsystems are not yet completely designed.
If CAD has been used on parts of the system, the FMEA can utilize that capability to simulate the effects of various failure modes. Such an analysis can greatly enhance the accuracy and objectivity of the FMEA process.
FMEA Process
FMEA is an ongoing process which should be started as soon as initial design information is available. It should be updated and enhanced as the design evolves, so that the analysis can be used to improve the design. All possible design alternatives should be analyzed separately, so that the effect on system performance and reliability can be considered in deciding which option to implement. Test results should be used later to update the analysis.
Requirements to Perform FMEA
- A team of people with a commitment to improve the ability of the design to meet the customer's needs
- Schematics and block diagrams of each level of the system, from subassemblies to complete system
- Component specifications, parts lists and design data
- Functional specifications of modules, subassemblies, etc.
- Design manuals
- Manufacturing requirements and details of the processes to be used
- FMEA forms and a list of any special considerations, such as safety or regulatory, that are applicable to this product
Page 2 of 5
Suggested Items
Bridging the Gap Between PCB Designers and Fabricators
04/03/2025 | Stephen V. Chavez, Siemens EDAWith today’s advanced EDA tools, designing complex PCBs in the virtual world does not necessarily mean they can be built in the real world. This makes the relationship between a PCB designer and a fabricator pivotal to the success of a project. In keeping with solid design for manufacturing (DFM) practices, clear and frequent communication is needed to dial and lock in design constraints that meet expectations while addressing manufacturing concerns.
IPC APEX EXPO Newcomer: Faith DeSaulnier of TTM Technologies
04/03/2025 | I-Connect007 Editorial TeamDuring the Newcomer’s Welcome Reception at IPC APEX EXPO, the I-Connect Editorial Team spoke with several first-time attendees. The following is our interview with Faith DeSaulnier, a process engineer based at TTM Technologies’ facility in Forest Grove, Oregon.
Ansys Semiconductor Solutions Certified by TSMC for Reliable, Accurate Analysis of Evolving Chip Designs
04/03/2025 | PRNewswireAnsys announced that PathFinder-SC is certified as a new ESD analysis solution for customers designing with TSMC's N2 silicon process technology. PathFinder-SC delivers a novel verification solution that provides superior capacity and performance, easily accommodating large designs in the cloud.
Real Time with... IPC APEX EXPO 2025: Insights into PCB Design and Manufacturing with Polar Instruments
04/03/2025 | Real Time with...IPC APEX EXPOErik Bateham discusses Polar's latest book, which enhances insights for PCB designers and manufacturers. The book, The Designer's Guide to... More Secrets of High-Speed PCBs, features a guest chapter on 2D via design modeling. Erik highlights the industry's shift towards UHDI and the challenges in measuring at micron levels.
Connect the Dots: Stop Killing Your Yield—The Hidden Cost of Design Oversights
04/03/2025 | Matt Stevenson -- Column: Connect the DotsI’ve been in this industry long enough to recognize red flags in PCB designs. When designers send over PCBs that look great on the computer screen but have hidden flaws, it can lead to manufacturing problems. I have seen this happen too often: manufacturing delays, yield losses, and designers asking, “Why didn’t anyone tell me sooner?” Here’s the thing: Minor design improvements can greatly impact manufacturing yield, and design oversights can lead to expensive bottlenecks. Here’s how to find the hidden flaws in a design and avoid disaster.