-
- News
- Books
Featured Books
- pcb007 Magazine
Latest Issues
Current IssueDon’t Just Survive, Thrive
If we are to be relevant and prosper during these next critical decades in electronics, we must do more than survive. As an industry, we can and must thrive. In this issue, our contributors explore these concepts meant to help you take your business to the next level.
Material Matters
Materials management is nuanced, multifaceted, and requires a holistic systems approach for business success. When building high mix, low volume, and high technology, managing materials and overall cost containment are even greater challenges.
Additive Manufacturing
In this month’s issue, we explore additive manufacturing technology for the PCB fabricator: where it stands today, the true benefits, and where it seems to be headed.
- Articles
- Columns
Search Console
- Links
- Events
||| MENU - pcb007 Magazine
Vertical Conductive Structures, Part 2: VeCS and Micro-machining
July 10, 2019 | Joan Tourné, NextGIn Technology BVEstimated reading time: 4 minutes
![](https://iconnect007.com/application/files/6516/3130/7975/JoanTourne_200.jpg)
Editor's Note: Click here to read Part 1.
Micro-machining is used every day in circuit board manufacturing with both drill and routing bits. Micro-machining is a very broad term for techniques used to shape an object. I introduce this term because micro-machining, in combination with the fabrication and processing of objects in 2.5D and 3D is not commonly used in circuit board manufacturing. But vertical conductive structure (VeCS) technology will change that.
Today, the industry has available to it the infrastructure needed to shape circuits in a different way and to create new functions and applications, such as higher density connections between internal and external layers and tuned connections that minimize signal distortion. VeCS is a multi-depth slot element currently achieved with CNC machines (part of today’s infrastructure) using drill and router bits to create the shapes (Figure 1). The objective is to create a new structure that makes the vertical connections using the board real estate differently so that we do not comprise isolation.
CAF/electron migration are the primary constraints in reducing the distance between vertical connections (via hole, microvia, etc.). By using micro-machining, we can create structures that are less–or not at all–sensitive to these isolation defects. VeCS-1, as described in the first article of this series, is a slot going through the circuit from top to bottom. In this article, I will focus on VeCS-2 technology (blind slots) as more micro-machining techniques are required for VeCS-2 than VeCS-1.
Note that the examples in this article all focus on slots with the same depth. In a later article on VeCS, we will see multi-depth slots connecting signals, not only connecting the signal from the outside layers to the internal layer but from, for example, layer 3 to layer 10 creating an internal layer transition. Also, in future articles, we will address transparent layer transitions where more micro-machining techniques will come into play to define the different depths as well as the sequence of processing. It would be preferred to have machine codes defined that determined the depths and sequence of the processing. CAM systems need to accommodate the rules and process sequences to minimise the potential for error in engineering and fabrication.
Figure 1: The basic VeCS element shown from the bottom side using two traces and a power connection at the far end of the slot. Terms for the wide structures are cross route and bottom route.
The VeCS slot shown in Figure 2 is close to a 2.7 mm depth in a 3.0 mm product. The plating is split at the bottom of the deep slot creating two potentials. This particular slot is part of a test coupon, and therefore, has a connection on every layer. This would not be representative of a typical design.
Figure 2: Basic high aspect ratio VeCS-2 element.
If we use the VeCS for an internal layer transition (no connection at the top layer) we micro-machine the vertical trace away in the same process step as we do the cross route. Building on part one of this series where I introduced the VeCS slot, I will introduce some additional features under the topic of micromachining.
Power VeCS
Electronics design applications constantly need more power and current, which opposes the need to make the features smaller, increasing resistance. These opposing constraints still apply to VeCS. With Power-VeCS, the vertical copper trace is shaped so that the cross section is larger, giving it a lower conductivity. Figure 3 shows the use of a half round cylinder extending from the side wall of the slot on the top layers (adding this construct on every layer compromises the routing channel).
We create the lower resistance connection by a combination of the vertical trace shapes with a stackup where Layer 2 (green) and Layer 3 (red) are a power/ground layer. In this manner, we create a lower resistance connection while keeping the connection to all ground and power in the same position. This prevents the shifting of ground and power. And at the same time, we keep the CAF bridge in place.
Data Size
One difference between using micro-machining and the traditional PCB data sets can be the number of lines of machine-code/G-code required. For some designs, the amount of programming code can easily exceed the memory capacity of the current generation CNC machines. To reduce the number of lines of CNC code required, one could always write a specific machine code that defines a slot using a sequence of numbers for slot length and depth. Naturally, this makes the process more complex in that data files need to be cut up with correspondingly increased potential for error.
Micro-machining Experiences
Depth control is one of the challenges in setting up the VeCS-2 slots process. Dielectric tolerances are a critical parameter when setting the depth. Dielectric measurement across the panel needs to be performed to set the correct depth. The layer below the slot needs to have isolation thick enough to accommodate the tolerance of the Z-axis on the CNC machine. This tolerance needs to be in the region of ±0.02 mm. It should be noted also that the type of pressure foot as well as resetting the Z-axis counter through contact with the surface are important in achieving good depth tolerances. Later in this series, I will introduce layer detection. This technique prevents what would otherwise be a complex, time-consuming, and somewhat inaccurate depth-setting process. Similar techniques will also be used for back drilling and depth-control drilling.
To read the full article, which appeared in the June 2019 issue of PCB007 Magazine, click here.
Suggested Items
Trouble in Your Tank: Materials for PWB Fabrication—Drillability and Metallization
07/16/2024 | Michael Carano -- Column: Trouble in Your TankLaminate materials are the building blocks on which printed circuit boards are manufactured. Circuit board designers rely on the critical electrical properties of the materials to design the interconnects, and with the drive toward IoT (internet of things), autonomous driving, and virtual and augmented reality, material properties take on a very high level of importance.
Beyond Prepreg: The Glassless ‘Revolution’
06/25/2024 | Marcy LaRont, PCB007 MagazineAs our industry rallies around the call to action for HDI and UHDI, we find unparalleled and myriad laminate options. This abundance is rivaled only by the question surrounding them: Can they measure up to the high technology packaging demands required in our near future? Unsurprisingly, recent developments in FR-4-esque materials for high-speed and high-density designs, as well as newer, glassless technology for replacing traditional glass-impregnated laminates and prepreg, are garnering much interest. I caught up with Alun Morgan, technology ambassador for Ventec International Group, to ask about the impending “glassless revolution” and how it’s poised to solve some of our manufacturing challenges.
Connect the Dots: Designing for Reality—Lamination and Materials
06/19/2024 | Matt Stevenson -- Column: Connect the DotsAs many of you have likely figured out, I am quite passionate about the subject of designing PCBs for the reality of manufacturing. I wrote a book about it and I participate in an I-Connect007 On the Line with… podcast series dedicated to the subject. This companion article will focus on multilayer lamination, keeping the bigger picture in mind: Realistic PCB designs should prioritize manufacturability and reliability of the PCB as well as meet the other design requirements. So, one must account for the production variables associated with individual manufacturing partners.
Day 2: A Full Day at the EIPC Summer Conference
06/19/2024 | Pete Starkey, I-Connect007Editor's note: This is the third and final report from the EIPC Summer Conference. It was a bright and early start to the second day of the 2024 EIPC Summer Conference at the European Space Centre, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, June 4-5. A short journey by bus from the hotel in Leiden and our security passes from the day before got us through the gate and to our seats in the Newton Room for Session 4, “Material Studies,” moderated by Martyn Gaudion.
Looking Into Space: EIPC Summer Conference, Part 2
06/17/2024 | Pete Starkey, I-Connect007“Innovative Development of PCB Technology and Design” was the theme of the second session of the 2024 EIPC Summer Conference, June 4-5, at the European Space Centre, Noordwijk, The Netherlands.