-
- News
- Books
Featured Books
- smt007 Magazine
Latest Issues
Current IssueCertifications
Certifications have historically been seen as a cost of doing business, but how do we turn them into a positive ROI and a value to both customer and vendor?
The Butterfly Effect
The basis of chaos theory is a key concept known as the “butterfly effect.” It’s the idea that a small event in one place creates a cascading set of events elsewhere. So, how is the EMS landscape changing? We’re tracking the concerns and dynamics of this landscape, and there’s a lot to learn.
Coming to Terms With AI
In this issue, we examine the profound effect artificial intelligence and machine learning are having on manufacturing and business processes. We follow technology, innovation, and money as automation becomes the new key indicator of growth in our industry.
- Articles
- Columns
Search Console
- Links
- Events
||| MENU - smt007 Magazine
IPC Panel on Bottom-terminated Components
September 27, 2019 | Andy Shaughnessy, I-Connect007Estimated reading time: 7 minutes
![](https://iconnect007.com/application/files/8016/3131/9198/TomRovere-300.jpg)
During the IPC Summer Meetings in Raleigh, North Carolina, I sat down with Tom Rovere, a materials and process engineer at Lockheed Martin in Owego, New York. We explored a panel discussion on bottom-terminated components (BTCs) that Tom participated in as well as the challenges and issues related to BTCs and the important role that designers play in that process.
Andy Shaughnessy: Tom, it’s nice to meet you. You were on the BTC panel this morning, which was pretty interesting. Can you give us some background on yourself and how you acquired such a cool bio that says you know all about BTCs?
Tom Rovere: Looking back, I graduated from college with a material science and engineering degree. Then, I moved to Owego, New York, and started working at Lockheed. At that point, I didn’t have any experience with electronics assembly. I was lucky to have some great mentors, and over the past 10+ years of working on the manufacturing line, I’ve learned a great deal about ball grid arrays (BGAs), surface-mount technology, and bottom-terminated components. Over time, you use IPC standards, so I figured that I should start attending some of the IPC conferences. Most recently, I wanted to get more involved, so I kindly emailed the IPC Conference Manager and said, “Put me on a panel!” That’s how I got this opportunity.
Shaughnessy: It was a great panel. Everyone agreed that BTCs are very robust; they’re bulletproof, etc., but they have problems too. We know the pros, but can you talk about some of the cons?
Rovere: My expertise with BTCs is more related to the solder joint reliability and rework. We also had Dave Hillman, who’s probably one of the best industry experts to have on a panel with regards to BTCs and soldering. It was nice having him there because he answered a lot of the questions, and I could sit and nod my head in agreement. The assembly and reflow portion seems to be fairly robust. With mechanical reliability, voiding also doesn’t seem to be an issue either, according to Dave’s data.
Now, we’ve started to look back and think, “What about the cleanliness of these?” With such a low-profile part, it’s not as easy to get cleaning solution into those crevices and under those parts to get residual material out. We joked, saying that one option is to stop using flux, but you can’t do that yet. So, you’re stuck with flux or the byproduct of whatever is left after the soldering process, and you have to get that out. That’s one of the bigger challenges with low-profile parts, such as BTCs.
Now, there are design changes to improve cleanliness. One example we’ve talked about is removing the masking underneath. But at the same time, there’s a trade-off. Removing the masking could potentially create solder bridges underneath the component. When manufacturing, I would rather not remove that masking because it creates a different defect, one that may be more difficult to fix.
Shaughnessy: That’s one of the things where everybody blames or credits the designer, depending on if things go well or poorly. But there were certain things designers can do, like removing the solder mask, as you mentioned.
Rovere: Yes, and there are other issues with those parts as well; a lot of information is run through them, and they tend to get fairly hot on the board, which requires a lot of cooling. The parts are typically cooled through the board with the bottom termination. Unfortunately, since this termination is underneath the part, it’s tough to see an issue before it actually happens.
Shaughnessy: You said that designers would come to you and say, “Well, this one burned up!” And that’s how they know it failed?
Rovere: Right, they’ll say, “This one fried, so we need to take it off and put it back on.” By that time, it’s too late to do any failure analysis.” I wanted to know what the other panelists thought, so even though I was on the panel, I was almost part of the audience because I was interested in learning more and asked the other panelists questions too. For example, I asked, “Is there anything else we can do testing-wise to isolate these issues and screen out these parts before they burn up, and we have to replace them?”
Shaughnessy: Someone pointed out that the designer could play a big part in BTCs.
Rovere: Sometimes, designers need something that manufacturers would not prefer, but if it’s necessary, you have to reach a compromise. A designer might say that the ground pad underneath the BTC must have several vias in it to improve cooling. A manufacturer might ask, “Can we fill those vias with epoxy and plate over them? This will limit potential voiding, but it costs a little bit more money. That’s the compromise you have to make for a better surface underneath, so you don’t lose all of your solder down the vias.” Again, there’s a trade-off between cost, manufacturing, and design.
Page 1 of 2
Suggested Items
Altus Highlights Success of Essemtec's I2S in the UK and Ireland Market
07/23/2024 | Altus GroupAltus Group, a leading distributor of capital equipment for the electronics industry in the UK and Ireland, is pleased to highlight the success of Essemtec's Integrated Inspection System (I2S).
Automatic Paste Transfer and Quick Change Squeegee for ASMPT Printers
07/23/2024 | ASMPTASMPT, the market and innovation leader in SMT manufacturing technology, has added two new features to its proven DEK printing platforms that automate solder paste transfers and simplify squeegee changes.
New Breakthrough in Double-Sided Reflow Part Retention from Alltemated
07/19/2024 | AlltematedAlltemated's PLACE-N-BOND™ underfilm passed testing and was implemented in volume production to aid in component retention during the second pass reflow of printed circuit assemblies. This successful testing and implementation occurred in various applications with components such as capacitors, inductors, transformers, connectors, and larger ICs.
Book Excerpt: The Printed Circuit Assembler’s Guide to... Factory Analytics, Chapter 2
07/17/2024 | I-Connect007 Editorial TeamIn this chapter, we’ll focus on the most important analytics at the forefront of SMT, from the solder paste machine to placement machines, and breakdown these metrics from the perspectives of the different decision makers involved in the process. The lead SMT shift manager isn’t going to have the same concerns as a quality manager, so it’s important to look at how each machine and operation contains valuable KPIs for each role.
SMTA Heartland Chapter Announces Rescheduled Date for High Reliability: Virtual STAR Forum
07/10/2024 | SMTAThe SMTA Heartland Chapter announces the rescheduled date for the High Reliability: Virtual STAR Forum, following the overwhelming success of our May event. Join us on Tuesday, July 30, 2024, for an afternoon of engaging discussions and expert insights into high-reliability manufacturing.