-
- News
- Books
Featured Books
- smt007 Magazine
Latest Issues
Current IssueDo You Have X-ray Vision?
Has X-ray’s time finally come in electronics manufacturing? Join us in this issue of SMT007 Magazine, where we answer this question and others to bring more efficiency to your bottom line.
IPC APEX EXPO 2025: A Preview
It’s that time again. If you’re going to Anaheim for IPC APEX EXPO 2025, we’ll see you there. In the meantime, consider this issue of SMT007 Magazine to be your golden ticket to planning the show.
Technical Resources
Key industry organizations–all with knowledge sharing as a part of their mission–share their technical repositories in this issue of SMT007 Magazine. Where can you find information critical to your work? Odds are, right here.
- Articles
- Columns
Search Console
- Links
- Media kit
||| MENU - smt007 Magazine
X-Ray Inspection of Lead and Lead-Free Solder Joints
July 31, 2017 | Glen Thomas, Ph.D., and Bill Cardoso, Ph.D., Creative Electron Inc.Estimated reading time: 13 minutes
where I is the intensity of the X-rays transmitted through the subject, I0 is the original intensity of the X-rays incident on the object, μ is the linear attenuation coefficient of the object, and x is the thickness of the object, as seen also in Figure 3.
Figure 3: X-ray photons passing through a homogeneous attenuating (μ) material of constant thickness (x).
Therefore, absorption of X-rays by a material is dependent on the thickness of the material and on the material-dependent attenuation coefficient. Diagnostic X-rays can be absorbed by a material via two primary mechanisms: Compton scattering and the photoelectric effect.
Compton scattering occurs when an X-ray photon collides with an outer shell electron within the subject. Upon collision, the electron absorbs a portion of the X-ray energy and is ejected from the atom. The X-ray photon is deflected from its original direction and loses some energy. This scattering can occur in all directions and can lead to noise at the detector. The amount of Compton scattering that occurs within an object depends primarily on the energy of the incident X-ray photon and the density of the object. Compton scattering decreases slightly with increasing photon energy, so higher energy X-rays are better able to pass through a sample without attenuation. The density of outer shell electrons increases with the mass density of a material, so denser materials tend to have more Compton scattering and therefore more X-ray attenuation.
The photoelectric effect occurs when an X-ray photon transfers all of its energy to an inner shell electron within the subject. This electron is ejected from the atom and its vacancy is subsequently filled by an outer-shell electron, which leads to the release of a secondary photon. The photoelectric effect is highly dependent on both the energy of the incident X-ray and the atomic weight of the object. The photoelectric effect is strongest when the X-ray energy matches the binding energy of the inner-shell electrons. As X-ray energy increases, the likelihood of the photoelectric effect drops rapidly, proportional to the inverse cube of the X-ray energy (1/E3). If the X-ray energy is below the energy of a particular electron shell, then none of those electrons can participate in the photoelectric effect because the X-ray does not have enough energy to overcome the electron binding energy. This leads to the K-edge effect, where the probability of absorption due to the photoelectric effect jumps abruptly as the X-ray energy increases above the K shell electron binding energy. The photoelectric effect is also proportional to the cube of a material’s atomic number (Z3), so high atomic weight materials exhibit a much stronger photoelectric effect than low atomic weight materials. This is why contrast agents for CT traditionally include high atomic weight elements (e.g., iodine, barium). The K-edge effect is shown in Figure 4, which demonstrates the relative probability of X-ray photon attenuation at different X-ray energies for several high Z materials commonly found in lead and lead-free solder compounds.
Figure 4: Mass attenuation coefficients for various elements as a function of X-ray photon energy. Note the dominance of the photoelectric cross-section, followed by the Rayleigh and Compton cross-sections.
Many factors affect the attenuation of X-rays as they pass through a material. These “factors” are summarized in terms of a number of parameters known as scattering cross-sections, which may be loosely thought of as an effective capture area over which an X-ray photon experiences some type of scattering event. X-ray photons experience a variety of scattering interactions, including photoelectric, Compton, pair production, Rayleigh, and photonuclear[2]. For the energy range in which the X-ray machine used in these experiments operates, photoelectric interactions are predominant, followed by Rayleigh and Compton. The parameter that provides all the information necessary to predict bulk attenuation properties is known as the attenuation coefficient. Scattering cross sections and attenuation coefficients have been measured for the elements and are readily available[3,4].
Lead, for example, has a linear attenuation coefficient μ = 26.43 cm-1 for 80keV X-rays. (80keV is the middle of the energy spectrum in the TruView FUSION 150kV.) Thus, 1mm of lead reduces transmitted intensity to 7.1% of the incident intensity. The ability of a material to attenuate the X-rays produced by the X-ray machine depends primarily on three factors: 1) its atomic number, 2) its density, and 3) the frequency of the radiation. The photoelectric cross-section depends on these three factors approximately as
for hν below 100keV, where τ is the photoelectric cross-section, ρ is the density, Z is the atomic number, ν is the radiation frequency, and h is Planck’s constant. This expression indicates why lead and other high Z materials are such good attenuators of lower energy X-rays. Rayleigh scattering behaves as
Page 2 of 5
Suggested Items
Real Time with... IPC APEX EXPO 2025: New Dispensing and Coating Solutions
04/03/2025 | Real Time with...IPC APEX EXPOMichael Hanke, Global Sales Officer at Rehm, discusses new dispensing and coating equipment developed in Germany. He emphasizes the significance of software integration with customer systems to tackle market challenges.
BEST Inc. Presents StencilQuik for Simplifying BGA Rework Challenges
04/02/2025 | BEST Inc.BEST Inc., a leader in electronic component rework services, training, and rework tools is thrilled to announce StencilQuik™ rework stencils. This innovative product is specifically designed for placing Ball Grid Arrays (BGAs) or Chip Scale Packages (CSPs) during the rework process.
Real Time with... IPC APEX EXPO 2025: Nordson's Expansion of Intelligent Technologies
04/02/2025 | Real Time with...IPC APEX EXPOJonathia Ang-Mueller gives an update on Nordson's latest selective soldering system which features a small footprint, offering cost savings and increased production capacity. Advanced software allows for pre-sales simulations, enhancing customer engagement.
Knocking Down the Bone Pile: Basics of Component Lead Tinning
04/02/2025 | Nash Bell -- Column: Knocking Down the Bone PileThe component lead tinning process serves several critical functions, including removing gold plating, mitigation of tin whiskers, reconditioning of component solderability issues, and alloy conversion from lead-free (Pb-free) to tin-lead or from tin-lead to lead-free for RoHS compliance. We will cover each of these topics in more detail in upcoming columns.
Real Time with... IPC APEX EXPO 2025: Innovations at Indium Corporation—A Look into the Future
04/02/2025 | Real Time with...IPC APEX EXPOIndium Corporation, led by CEO Ross Berntson, is making strides in automotive applications with innovative solder paste technologies. The company prioritizes sustainability and energy efficiency in manufacturing while developing its workforce through partnerships with local universities.