-
- News
- Books
Featured Books
- design007 Magazine
Latest Issues
Current IssueAll About That Route
Most designers favor manual routing, but today's interactive autorouters may be changing designers' minds by allowing users more direct control. In this issue, our expert contributors discuss a variety of manual and autorouting strategies.
Creating the Ideal Data Package
Why is it so difficult to create the ideal data package? Many of these simple errors can be alleviated by paying attention to detail—and knowing what issues to look out for. So, this month, our experts weigh in on the best practices for creating the ideal design data package for your design.
Designing Through the Noise
Our experts discuss the constantly evolving world of RF design, including the many tradeoffs, material considerations, and design tips and techniques that designers and design engineers need to know to succeed in this high-frequency realm.
- Articles
- Columns
- Links
- Media kit
||| MENU - design007 Magazine
Runner-up Discusses IPC Design Competition
March 16, 2023 | I-Connect007 Editorial TeamEstimated reading time: 2 minutes

PCB designer Adam Thorvaldson of Innovex was a finalist in this year’s IPC Design Competition at IPC APEX EXPO. He came in second place in this final heat, which is quite a feat, considering that the contest started last fall with 49 contestants from around the globe. We asked Adam to share his thoughts on the competition, what it means to be one of the winners, and any ideas about improving the contest for 2024 in Anaheim.
Kelly Dack: Adam, you’ve finished up the design competition here at IPC APEX EXPO. What did you think of the experience?
Adam Thorvaldson: This experience has been very eye-opening. The event is great; the competition has been very interesting, and the town is beautiful.
Dack: How did you hear about the competition? What were the previous heats like?
Thorvaldson: I learned about the competition on LinkedIn. I like finding ways to better myself and develop new foundations for future growth. I applied, signed up, got the project files, and competed in the first round. My first round took about 49 hours of work, and later I found out I was a finalist.
Andy Shaughnessy: That was when we had 49 finalists?
Thorvaldson: Yes, and that was all wrapped up in November.
Dack: What about the EDA tools? For the final heat, everyone used Altium Designer.
Thorvaldson: But in the first round we were allowed to use any software package. I was able to use the tool that I was most familiar with, that I’ve been on for 25+ years, so it made it really easy for me. I’m not sure what everybody else was using in the earlier heats.
Dack: Designers often have to switch software in their careers. To participate in a competition like this, some of you had to learn the ropes of a new program fairly quickly.
Thorvaldson: Sure. For the competition, the finalists received a 30-day trial license to learn Altium beforehand. Unfortunately, I got my license only 10 days before the show, so it’s been a crash course. The tool I’m most familiar with is Allegro (and OrCAD) PCB Designer from Cadence. They’re a little different. I learned Eagle years ago. I’ve known about Altium for a long time, but I finally got my hands on it about 10 days ago and it’s very bewildering. There are some features that I like but I haven’t had enough time on the tool to become familiar with its behavior. For the competition today, I didn’t feel comfortable, but I didn’t give up.
Dack: You’re a true designer. First, because you didn’t give up, and you saw the importance of the task at hand. Given the tools that you had, you made the best of it. Congratulations for that.
Thorvaldson: Thank you.
To read this entire conversation, which appeared in the March 2023 issue of Design007 Magazine, click here.
Suggested Items
The Global Electronics Association Releases IPC-8911: First-Ever Conductive Yarn Standard for E-Textile Application
07/02/2025 | Global Electronics AssociationThe Global Electronics Association announces the release of IPC-8911, Requirements for Conductive Yarns for E-Textiles Applications. This first-of-its-kind global standard establishes a clear framework for classifying, designating, and qualifying conductive yarns—helping to address longstanding challenges in supply chain communication, product testing, and material selection within the growing e-textiles industry.
IPC-CFX, 2.0: How to Use the QPL Effectively
07/02/2025 | Chris Jorgensen, Global Electronics AssociationIn part one of this series, we discussed the new features in CFX Version 2.0 and their implications for improved inter-machine communication. But what about bringing this new functionality to the shop floor? The IPC-CFX-2591 QPL is a powerful technical resource for manufacturers seeking CFX-enabled equipment. The Qualified Product List (QPL) helps streamline equipment selection by listing models verified for CFX compliance through a robust third-party virtual qualification process.
Advancing Aerospace Excellence: Emerald’s Medford Team Earns Space Addendum Certification
06/30/2025 | Emerald TechnologiesWe’re thrilled to announce a major achievement from our Medford, Oregon facility. Andy Abrigo has officially earned her credentials as a Certified IPC Trainer (CIT) under the IPC J-STD-001 Space Addendum, the leading industry standard for space and military-grade electronics manufacturing.
Magnalytix and Foresite to Host Technical Webinar on SIR Testing and Functional Reliability
06/26/2025 | MAGNALYTIXMagnalytix, in collaboration with Foresite Inc., is pleased to announce an upcoming one-hour Webinar Workshop titled “Comparing SIR IPC B-52 to Umpire 41 Functional & SIR Test Method.” This session will be held on July 24, 2025, and is open to professionals in electronics manufacturing, reliability engineering, and process development seeking insights into new testing standards for climatic reliability.
IPC Rebrands as Global Electronics Association: Interview With Dr. John W. Mitchell
06/22/2025 | Marcy LaRont, I-Connect007Today, following a major announcement, IPC is embracing the rapid advancement of technology with a bold decision to change its name to the Global Electronics Association. This name more accurately reflects the full breadth of its work and the modern realities of electronics manufacturing. In this exclusive interview, Global Electronics Association President and CEO Dr. John W. Mitchell shares the story behind the rebrand: Why now, what it means for the industry, and how it aligns with the organization’s mission.