Happy’s Tech Talk #34: Producibility and Other Pseudo-metrics
It’s Only Common Sense: Results Come from Action, Not Intention
The New Chapter: Navigating Maternity Leave in the Electronics Industry
Battling Counterfeit Electronics in Manufacturing
October 7, 2024 | Nolan Johnson, I-Connect007Estimated reading time: 2 minutes
Paul Jarski, product development manufacturing leader at Case New Holland (CNH), discusses his extensive experience with counterfeit electronics throughout his career. He highlights the challenges faced during market allocations, where counterfeit parts infiltrated supply chains and causing significant issues. Paul recounts the rigorous processes implemented to detect and prevent counterfeits, including advanced material analysis and testing. Counterfeit parts occasionally slipped through despite these measures, leading to costly and time-consuming audits and verifications to ensure product integrity and safety.
Nolan Johnson: Paul, tell me a little about your background.
Paul Jarski:
Paul Jarski: I currently work with large and compact tractors at CNH. I’m the liaison between the product development and manufacturing organizations.
Prior to this role, I’ve spent most of my career in agricultural technology, both with CNH and other companies. With the advances in farming technology, the development of rugged electronics equipment has been and continues to be a critical part of the business.
Johnson: So, you have an extensive background in managing counterfeiting issues.
Jarski: Yes. For most of my career, I have been involved in the manufacturing, quality, and supply chain portions of the AG electronics business. I started my career in this area as a process/quality engineer as a liaison between my company and EMS providers. We'd get a product stable and move it to the EMS provider. We still owned the design and controlled everything in the BOM, the AML.
We all know the electronics industry goes through allocations every three to four years. When that happened, we looked for parts. We went to the broker market if we couldn’t get them through normal chains.
I remember some of the first brokered parts we bought in the mid-2000s. After the 2008 economic meltdown, everybody in the electronics industry had slashed their capacity. For the ag industry, it was a blip. In the space of a year, we went from building at 100% capacity to cutting production to going all out and needing to increase equipment capacity. When everybody in the electronics component industry had cut capacity, we had to go to the broker market to find components. However, we also realized the inherent danger in this approach, so we knew we had to be careful of what we purchased.
When we purchased components from the secondary (broker) market, we started implementing checks to verify authenticity. I remember clearly some of the first counterfeits. As soon as they came in, we suspected something was wrong. The labels were poorly printed on the reels, the silk screening on the physical parts wasn't spelled correctly, and you could rub the labeling off the part. I remember us throwing some samples in the X-ray, only to find there was nothing inside. We saw a lot of crude stuff. If you had an X-ray and a cotton swab with acetone, you could tell if it was a counterfeit.
Fast forward to the next market allocation in the 2013-14 timeframe and we found that counterfeiters had advanced their game significantly.
To read this entire conversation, which appeared in the October 2024 issue of SMT007 Magazine, click here.
Share on:
Suggested Items
Nolan's Notes: The Rise (and Risk) of Data
11/05/2024 | Nolan Johnson -- Column: Nolan's NotesLast month, I read about a United Airlines flight that declared an emergency over the middle of Hudson Bay in northern Canada. All the cockpit screens had gone blank and both flight management computers had entered into a “degraded mode with limited capabilities.” The pilots had lost most of their autopilot functionality, but still had enough control systems to manually fly the plane to a safe landing at O’Hare.
Root-cause Analysis and Problem-solving
11/01/2024 | Happy Holden, I-Connect007An essential skill for any process engineer in printed circuit fabrication is the ability to conduct root-cause analysis (RCA) and problem-solving. These are related to TQC and Six Sigma applications and are essential for customer support and continued profitability. All engineers will encounter these methods sooner or later, but it will likely be sooner if you are in product or process engineering in manufacturing.
The Chemical Connection: Troubleshooting PCB Process Problems
10/29/2024 | Don Ball -- Column: The Chemical ConnectionAs a supplier of PCB wet processing equipment, we inevitably find ourselves involved in helping customers solve sudden process problems that may or may not be caused by equipment malfunctions. For the most part, equipment problems are relatively easy to identify and repair: sensors for chemistry and equipment control, clogged nozzles and filters, leaks in the plumbing, etc. But what happens when the equipment checks out and the problem is still there?
Highlights of the ICT 50th Anniversary Symposium
10/24/2024 | Pete Starkey, I-Connect007Why does it always rain when I attend these events? Temperatures were dropping, daylight was shrinking, and there were seasonal colour changes in wet hedgerows as I travelled to Gloucestershire for the 50th Anniversary Symposium of the Institute of Circuit Technology at Puckrup Hall near Tewkesbury in mid-October. It was a memorable occasion: Nostalgic for my contemporaries who remembered our industry at its most prosperous, technically outstanding in the quality and significance of presentations to an attentive audience of printed circuit professionals, and complemented by the sharing of ideas, information, and trade gossip within a friendly community at the evening gathering.
Dan’s Biz Bookshelf: ‘The Wizard and the Warrior: Leading with Passion and Power’
10/16/2024 | Dan Beaulieu -- Column: Dan's Biz BookshelfThe fact that this book talks about different styles of leadership and helps you define and identify the types of leaders is what makes it interesting. Here are two names you’ve likely never heard in the same sentence: Richard Nixon and Mother Teresa. They both did a lot of good—arguably Mother Teresa more than Nixon and perhaps on a smaller stage—but they each had a dark side. I think we all know about Nixon’s dark side. Although a brilliant strategist, he was practically devoured by demons of small-mindedness—paranoia that led to his demise.