-
- News
- Books
Featured Books
- smt007 Magazine
Latest Issues
Current IssueCertifications
Certifications have historically been seen as a cost of doing business, but how do we turn them into a positive ROI and a value to both customer and vendor?
The Butterfly Effect
The basis of chaos theory is a key concept known as the “butterfly effect.” It’s the idea that a small event in one place creates a cascading set of events elsewhere. So, how is the EMS landscape changing? We’re tracking the concerns and dynamics of this landscape, and there’s a lot to learn.
Coming to Terms With AI
In this issue, we examine the profound effect artificial intelligence and machine learning are having on manufacturing and business processes. We follow technology, innovation, and money as automation becomes the new key indicator of growth in our industry.
- Articles
- Columns
Search Console
- Links
- Events
||| MENU - smt007 Magazine
The Double-edged Sword of CMMC 2.0
June 6, 2022 | Divyash Patel, MX2 TechnologyEstimated reading time: 2 minutes
![](https://iconnect007.com/application/files/1616/9086/8615/Divyash_Patel.jpg)
For the past few years, those whose SMT provider organizations supply or contract with the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) have been hearing about—or even gearing up for—implementation of the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) program. By this, I mean that you were gearing up for CMMC 1.0. Today, we have CMMC 2.0, and there are several changes in the new version that impact both the standards for compliance and how you certify that compliance—especially if you run a small business.
Small businesses are the backbone of the defense industrial base (DIB), just as they are for the entire economy. As both patriots and businesspeople, I’m sure most contractors serving the DoD support the goals of the CMMC program: ensuring the security of sensitive data up and down the supply chain. I’m also certain that the CMMC 1.0 rules, which went into effect in November 2020, caused more than a little stress and anxiety for smaller contractors. Why? Because CMMC 1.0 required contractors to undergo an examination by a Certified Third-Party Assessment Organization (C3PAO) to become certified.
When it became clear that the burden CMMC 1.0 placed on small contractors was significant enough to potentially force some out of the DIB, the DoD hit pause on the CMMC program. In fact, the official in charge of the CMMC’s implementation came out and said one of the main goals of revising the program was to decrease the cost burden on small businesses. As a result, the DoD scrapped CMMC 1.0 and announced CMMC 2.0 in November 2021. The full 2.0 framework is expected to be released sometime next year.
But don’t make the mistake of thinking the government will kick the CMMC can down the road once again when 2023 rolls around. I fully expect CMMC 2.0 to come online when the rules are final.
At a high level, the two major changes that will likely affect you are the new tiers of security and the shift to annual self-attestation of compliance.
The original CMMC defined five levels of security. CMMC 2.0 has three:
- Foundational
- Advanced
- Expert
For most of you, the newly collapsed levels won’t change the practical compliance requirements. This is good news. Most contracts will fall into Level 1, so any work you have done to this point to achieve Level 1 compliance under CMMC 1.0 has not been wasted. The new framework relies on the same 17 baseline security controls used in the prior version—more on those controls in a moment.
The key distinction between Level 1 and Level 2 under CMMC 2.0 has to do with the type of information you handle. Level 1 focuses on securing federal contract information (FCI), for which there are no national security concerns. The bar for Level 1 is not set very high— it is essentially developing and maintaining good baseline cybersecurity policies and procedures. In my view, this is something any company should do; it’s just a good business practice.
To read this entire article, which appeared in the June 2022 issue of SMT007 Magazine, click here.
Suggested Items
Greece Becomes Newest Member of the F-35 Lightning II Global Alliance
07/26/2024 | Lockheed MartinThe Greece government finalized its intention to procure 20 Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II aircraft by signing a Letter of Offer and Acceptance (LOA) through a U.S. government Foreign Military Sale. The LOA also includes an option for 20 additional aircraft.
BPMI Inc. Uses IPC Standards to Support the U.S. Nuclear-powered Naval Fleet
07/23/2024 | Linda Stepanich, IPCOur IPC member profile focuses on Bechtel Plant Machinery Inc (BPMI), responsible for the fabrication, test, delivery, installation, and field support of high-quality nuclear power plant components for installation in submarines and aircraft carriers.
Certificate vs. Certification: Achieving Your Organization’s Goals
07/22/2024 | Carlos Plaza, IPCThe terms “certification” and “certificate” are often used interchangeably, but there are well-defined differences in the world of credentials. These differences have important implications for when and how your organization invests in training and validation programs. In this article, I’ll break down the meaning and characteristics of each term, introduce IPC’s approach to training and certification, and explain how you can leverage each credential to achieve your goals.
Intel Launches Its First US Apprenticeship for Manufacturing Facility Technicians
07/16/2024 | BUSINESS WIREIntel is launching its first U.S. registered apprenticeship program for manufacturing facility technicians in Arizona in collaboration with the Arizona Commerce Authority (ACA), the Phoenix Business and Workforce Development Board, the SEMI Foundation, Maricopa Community Colleges District (MCCD) and Fresh Start Women’s Foundation.
RTX's Pratt & Whitney Completes F135 Engine Core Upgrade Preliminary Design Review
07/15/2024 | RTXPratt & Whitney, an RTX business, completed the F135 Engine Core Upgrade's (ECU) preliminary design review (PDR), affirming the ECU's design is on schedule and exceeding expectations.