Splitting Hairs: The Manufacture of HDI and Substrate Test Fixtures


Reading time ( words)

Testing of higher-density product has become ever more challenging with the advancement of chip technology. BGAs, CCDs and other active components have decreased in size so much that historical industry accepted test methodology can no longer effectively test these newer substrates incorporating this higher technology.

Universal grid test machines in North America, for the most part, are limited to single and double-density grids. Dedicated (wired) fixtures can combat some of the density issues faced in today’s test arena, but to successfully succeed in the high-volume demand market a test solution must be found to efficiently test the product and also provide automation to reduce cost.

Universal multi-plate fixtures routinely use test pins down to .3 mm. As pin size decreases, the need for extra plates in the fixture increases, so as to stabilize the pin and provide accurate loading of the pin. However, critical mass is soon reached as the fixture can no longer be solved due to inadequate grid contact availability. Further, as the density is maximized the fixture loses internal support and finally becomes unstable producing false defects, excessive troubleshooting and lost time.

Additionally, there is an ever-increasing demand for 4WK measurement especially on HDI boards, requiring two probes contacting the same pad simultaneously, which can only be tackled, especially for volume production, with this or similar technology.

HDI Fixtures vs. Substrate Fixtures

Quad and octal density universal equipment is used for standard HDI fixturing. Pin sizes for this type of fixturing are usually 90–110μm with a length of 20–30mm, therefore much smaller and shorter than standard universal grid fixtures.

To put this in to perspective the human hair has an average diameter of about 70μm (micron.) Pins in a substrate fixture of current generation typically are 70–50μm; the next generation under development will reach 40–25μm.

Substrate fixtures are typically not used with universal test machines. They require a much higher grid density; therefore the grid itself is generated as a wired solution either to standard connectors or to a universal one-touch interface depending on the final machine used.

HDI fixture usually test a complete test array, whereas substrate fixtures usually test only one or two images of the entire array and the machine will step the board through in multiple tests. That is mainly done to achieve the high accuracy required to test those kinds of boards and the extreme cost and time involved to make these fixture.

HDI fixture typically can be produced within 48 hours, the manufacturing time for a substrate fixture is usually 100–200 hours, and extreme cases can even take longer.

The manufacturing process for the substrate fixture is much more complex than the standard universal fixture. Accuracy is absolutely critical for the success of registering the product to the fixture.

There are basically six steps in the manufacturing process whether it is a hybrid design or a tension probe design:

1. DFM—Engineering

2. Drill

3. Electrode level—wiring, electroplating

4. Probe level—adding probes (wires)

5. Final assembly

6. Final QC and test setup

Read The Full Article Here

Editor's Note: This article originally appeared in the April issue of The PCB Magazine.

Share

Print


Suggested Items

PCB Sourcing Using PCQR2

03/30/2021 | Al Block, Naji Norder, and Chris Joran, National Instruments
In a global market, it is often difficult to determine the best PCB suppliers for your technology needs, while also achieving the lowest costs for your products. Considering each PCB supplier has their own niche in terms of equipment, process, and performance, uniform test data from the IPC-9151D Process Capability, Quality, and Relative Reliability (PCQR2) Benchmark Test Standard can help find the right source for the board based on its specific technology requirements.

Just Ask Joe Fjelstad: The Exclusive Compilation

11/19/2020 | I-Connect007 Editorial Team
We asked for you to send in your questions for Joe Fjelstad, and you took us up on it! We know you all enjoyed reading these questions and answers, so we’ve compiled all of them into one article for easy reference. We hope you enjoy having another bite at the apple. And if you’d like to hear more from Joe, view his column series “Flexible Thinking.”

I-Connect007 Editor’s Choice: Five Must-Reads for the Week

07/10/2020 | Nolan Johnson, PCB007
The common theme in this week’s Top 5 editor’s picks is “change.” We’re talking change in the form of forwarding process, achieving milestones, evolving, and improving metrics. This week’s picks are not only newsworthy but also captured reader attention based on metrics. If you haven’t read any other news items from the industry this week, I propose these five must-reads.



Copyright © 2021 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.