All About Flex: Taguchi Design of Experiments and Flexible CircuitsJuly 14, 2016 | Dave Becker, All Flex
Estimated reading time: 4 minutes
Reducing variability in a process, or a sequence of processes, can require a significant and structured amount of work and analysis. One must develop an understanding of critical variables and determine methods to control them. Statistically based experiments are often needed for proper analysis.
Classical Design of Experiments
One strategy is to use classical design of experiments (DOE).
With DOE, the technical team needs to first identify variables that are suspected to have a significant impact on the output. With best estimates of critical variables, the methodology then defines a high point and low of each identified variable. Variables don’t necessarily fall into “high” and “low” categories. They may include options like bake or no bake, alternative surface finishes, material types, etc. A series of experimental runs are designed that have variables run at the high point and a low point in combination with all the other variables low and high. The output of the experiment (i.e., the consequence of the variety of inputs), is best if it can be defined numerically.
The table below illustrates a simple two variable experimental design.
The design above is called full factorial because every combination of high and low variables is run. Of course with two variables, only four experimental runs are required to test every combination of high and low. For three variables, eight or 23 runs are required. A four-variable experiment would require 16 unique runs.
A key requirement for proper experimental design is to randomize the experimental order. This avoids results being contaminated by other conditions that were not controlled during the experiment. Randomizing the order of runs reduces the risk of built in experimental bias confounding the results.
A full factorial experiment provides the main effects of each variable plus all the interaction effects.
Designed experiments are valuable, but disruptive for three primary reasons:
- They should be performed on production equipment
- Proper examination of variables may involve a large number of experiments; if six variables are to be examined, a full factorial experiment would require 64 different runs
- Randomization adds set-up times and cost in a highly capitalized production environment
A more realistic type of DOE is called fractional factorial. Fractional factorial experiments are designed to only find out the main effects and major interactions; as such, they require fewer runs. Many good reference documents are available to assist with DOE layout, statistical interpretation, and factorial design.
Taguchi Design of Experiments
Taguchi design of experiments is a variation of fractional factorial experiments, but with a one major difference. It addresses the fact that it is not realistic to control every single variable that might affect the process. Outside temperature, humidity, time of day, raw material supplier and operator are just a few examples of variables that are either impossible or highly impractical to control. If the experiments are being done in production, they may need to be spread out over several weeks so production schedules can be accommodated. Randomizing the experiment in a full scale production environment is often prohibitively expensive.
The Taguchi method allows for the reality faced when conducting designed experiments in production: it is often not practical to properly randomize an experiment. So in addition to all the critical variables tested, another variable, noise, is allowed and defined. The noise contains all the variables that are not controlled. The high level might be the noise variables set at one realistic extreme and the low level might be all the noise variables set the other realistic extreme. One of the goals of the experiment is to determine what variables and variable settings yield the most robust results. These are settings where there is zero interaction effect with the noise variable.
Page 1 of 2
There has always been pressure to reduce line and space as we have seen the bleeding edge technology go from 8 mils to 5 mils and then to 3 mils. The difference between “then” and “now” is that the prior advancements, for the most part, used the same processes, chemistry and equipment going from 8 mils to 3 mils. But going from 3 mil to sub 1 mil trace and space is a quantum leap in printed circuit board (PCB) technology that requires a whole new set of processes and materials.
In a previous column, the critical process of desmear and its necessity to ensure a clean copper surface connection was presented. Now, my discussion will focus on obtaining a void-free and tightly adherent copper plating deposit on these surfaces. After the desmear process, the task is to insure a continuous, conductive, and void-free deposit on the via walls and capture pad. Today, there are several processes that can be utilized to render vias conductive.
Panasonic’s Darren Hitchcock spoke with the I-Connect007 Editorial Team on the complexities of moving toward ultra HDI manufacturing. As we learn in this conversation, the number of shifting constraints relative to traditional PCB fabrication is quite large and can sometimes conflict with each other.
MKS’ Atotech, a leading surface finishing brand of MKS Instruments, will participate in the upcoming IPCA Expo at Bangalore International Exhibition Centre (BIEC) and showcase its latest PCB manufacturing solutions from September 13 – 15.
Flexible circuit applications can be as basic as furnishing electrical interconnect between two conventional circuit board assemblies, or to prove a platform for placing and interconnecting electronic components. During the planning and pre-design phase of the flexible circuit, there will be several material and process related questions that need to be addressed. Most flexible circuit fabricators welcome the opportunity to discuss their customers’ flexible circuit objectives prior to beginning the actual design process.