Fresh PCB Concepts: The Journey of a PCB—A Tale of Sustainability and Circularity
Beyond Design: Integrated Circuit to PCB Integration
The Shaughnessy Report: Silicon to Systems—The Walls Are Coming DownDoes Copper Pour on a Signal Layer Decrease Signal-To-Signal Isolation?
April 7, 2022 | Steve Hageman, Analog HomeEstimated reading time: 1 minute
Does putting a ground pour on PCB signal layers make the isolation better or worse? It can go either way, but with the proper knowledge and application, this technique will improve your designs.
In this article, I’ll discuss how to simulate trace-to-trace isolation with true electromagnetic simulation software. We’ll also cover a variety of rules of thumb that can help you stay away from trouble.
Fact or Fiction?
Recently an acquaintance told me, “I have heard that putting a copper pour on a signal layer between traces actually makes the isolation between the traces worse.” I grabbed one of my RF boards and said, “If that is so, then how do all these RF boards that I have done with co-planar waveguide over ground manage to function? They all have copper pours on the signal layer, and they work to very high frequencies.”
Since co-planar waveguide over ground (CPWG), which is essentially “pouring copper on a signal layer,” is used for a lot of RF work, and is proven to work for very high-performance RF circuits, how did this contradictory opinion catch on in the industry?
To investigate this, I used a one-inch section of 50-ohm microstrip consisting of an aggressor trace from ports 1 to 2 and a victim trace running in parallel from ports 3 to 4. I used typical values for the dimensions as might be on a real PCB. The trace width is 20 mils, with a spacing of 60 mils from center to center, over an FR-4 substrate, 9.5 mils thick, with a modeled Er of 4.4.
To read this entire article, which appeared in the March 2022 issue of Design007 Magazine, click here.
Share on:
Suggested Items
Trouble in Your Tank: Things You Can Do for Better Wet Process Control
09/11/2024 | Michael Carano -- Column: Trouble in Your TankFor 40 years, I have been involved in the printed circuit board, circuit board assembly, and semiconductor technology segments, preaching about minimizing defects and improving yields. This is especially true as technology becomes increasingly complex, and additional focus must be placed on yield improvements. Process management and wet process control must be front and center, so it’s quite interesting and timely to talk about wet process control and management for this month’s issue. This theme fits quite well with today's global events. For this industry, the technical curve has steepened dramatically in the past few years.
Atotech to Participate at KPCA Show 2024
09/03/2024 | AtotechMKS’ Atotech will participate in this year’s KPCA Show 2024 in Incheon, held at Songdo Convensia from September 4-6, 2024.
Victory Announces Breakthrough in PCB Technology with New Product Launch
08/29/2024 | openPRShenzhen Victory Electronics Technology Co., Ltd., a leader in the printed circuit board (PCB) manufacturing industry, is proud to announce the successful development of a groundbreaking new product.
Connect the Dots: Designing for Reality—Electroless Copper
08/28/2024 | Matt Stevenson -- Column: Connect the DotsRoll up your sleeves because it's time to get messy. In a recent episode of I-Connect007’s On the Line with… podcast, we discussed electroless copper deposition. This process deposits a copper layer into the through-holes and vias of what will eventually be a PCB. Electroless copper deposition feels like a black box to many people. It sort of looks like a black box, too. The boards go in one side, come out the other, and emerge differently. So, let's crack open that black box and look inside.
Maximizing ROI Through Better Wet Process Control
08/20/2024 | I-Connect007 Editorial Team“When things get out of control, the variation in your wet process begins,” says Mike Carano,. “Just because they look like good boards and may even pass electrical test, it does not necessarily mean you have good boards. Once the chemistry is headed toward the right or left side of the process control parameter cliff, the plating is compromised. If the copper is thinner than it should be, when the customer puts it into service, the board may fail after 500 cycles vs. the requisite 1,000 or 2,000 cycles. The root cause issue is that you plated 7/10ths of a mil of copper instead of one-mil of copper because you were not controlling your process. The fact that you passed your own electric test becomes inconsequential.”