-
- News
- Books
Featured Books
- design007 Magazine
Latest Issues
Current IssueRules of Thumb
This month, we delve into rules of thumb—which ones work, which ones should be avoided. Rules of thumb are everywhere, but there may be hundreds of rules of thumb for PCB design. How do we separate the wheat from the chaff, so to speak?
Partial HDI
Our expert contributors provide a complete, detailed view of partial HDI this month. Most experienced PCB designers can start using this approach right away, but you need to know these tips, tricks and techniques first.
Silicon to Systems: From Soup to Nuts
This month, we asked our expert contributors to weigh in on silicon to systems—what it means to PCB designers and design engineers, EDA companies, and the rest of the PCB supply chain... from soup to nuts.
- Articles
- Columns
Search Console
- Links
- Media kit
||| MENU - design007 Magazine
Estimated reading time: 1 minute
The Shaughnessy Report: Despite Progress, Design Data Issues Continue
It seems so simple—you design a PCB, hand off the design to a fabricator, along with notes describing your design intent, and they manufacture the board. Everyone gets paid, and everyone’s happy, right?
Wrong.
Much of the time, that’s not how it works out—not even close.
You’ve heard the stories. Most CAM departments tell us (are they telling you?) that anywhere from 80–100% of designs from new customers are inaccurate or incomplete, often necessitating a Friday call to the designer, or the job will be put on hold.
This has been an ongoing problem for decades, and it doesn’t seem to be getting any better—at least from the viewpoint of CAM personnel. The problem is so prevalent that columnist Mark Thompson has built quite an audience by writing about design data packages and sharing his treasure trove of horror stories about data gone wrong.
Most of you are not new to the industry, shall we say. Many of you have at least 30 years of experience designing PCBs. You’ve done this hundreds of times before. But why are we still seeing so many errors during the post-processing part of the design flow?
You might think that constant improvements to the Gerber, ODB++, and IPC-2581 data formats would make issues like this a thing of the past. However, much of the data package is still dependent upon the designer’s ability to describe how they want the board built. It’s the little things that trip up a design, such as failing to specify whether a quarter ounce of copper is the weight before or after processing.
Part of the problem is that CAM people often fix the error without telling the designer, so the designer never knows that there was a problem in the first place, which perpetuates the issue.
What can we do to optimize the design data package and make the handoff to the fabricator as smooth as possible? We asked a variety of industry experts to weigh in on this topic.
To read this entire column, which appeared in the October 2018 issue of Design007 Magazine, click here.
More Columns from The Shaughnessy Report
The Shaughnessy Report: A Handy Look at Rules of ThumbThe Shaughnessy Report: Are You Partial to Partial HDI?
The Shaughnessy Report: Silicon to Systems—The Walls Are Coming Down
The Shaughnessy Report: Watch Out for Cost Adders
The Shaughnessy Report: Mechatronics—Designers Need to Know It All
The Shaughnessy Report: All Together Now—The Value of Collaboration
The Shaughnessy Report: Unlock Your High-speed Material Constraints
The Shaughnessy Report: Design Takes Center Stage at IPC APEX EXPO