-
- News
- Books
Featured Books
- I-Connect007 Magazine
Latest Issues
Current Issue
Beyond the Rulebook
What happens when the rule book is no longer useful, or worse, was never written in the first place? In today’s fast-moving electronics landscape, we’re increasingly asked to design and build what has no precedent, no proven path, and no tidy checklist to follow. This is where “Design for Invention” begins.
March Madness
From the growing role of AI in design tools to the challenge of managing cumulative tolerances, these articles in this issue examine the technical details, design choices, and manufacturing considerations that determine whether a board works as intended.
Looking Forward to APEX EXPO 2026
I-Connect007 Magazine previews APEX EXPO 2026, covering everything from the show floor to the technical conference. For PCB designers, we move past the dreaded auto-router and spotlight AI design tools that actually matter.
- Articles
- Columns
- Links
- Media kit
||| MENU - I-Connect007 Magazine
Estimated reading time: 1 minute
Contact Columnist Form
The Shaughnessy Report: Despite Progress, Design Data Issues Continue
It seems so simple—you design a PCB, hand off the design to a fabricator, along with notes describing your design intent, and they manufacture the board. Everyone gets paid, and everyone’s happy, right?
Wrong.
Much of the time, that’s not how it works out—not even close.
You’ve heard the stories. Most CAM departments tell us (are they telling you?) that anywhere from 80–100% of designs from new customers are inaccurate or incomplete, often necessitating a Friday call to the designer, or the job will be put on hold.
This has been an ongoing problem for decades, and it doesn’t seem to be getting any better—at least from the viewpoint of CAM personnel. The problem is so prevalent that columnist Mark Thompson has built quite an audience by writing about design data packages and sharing his treasure trove of horror stories about data gone wrong.
Most of you are not new to the industry, shall we say. Many of you have at least 30 years of experience designing PCBs. You’ve done this hundreds of times before. But why are we still seeing so many errors during the post-processing part of the design flow?
You might think that constant improvements to the Gerber, ODB++, and IPC-2581 data formats would make issues like this a thing of the past. However, much of the data package is still dependent upon the designer’s ability to describe how they want the board built. It’s the little things that trip up a design, such as failing to specify whether a quarter ounce of copper is the weight before or after processing.
Part of the problem is that CAM people often fix the error without telling the designer, so the designer never knows that there was a problem in the first place, which perpetuates the issue.
What can we do to optimize the design data package and make the handoff to the fabricator as smooth as possible? We asked a variety of industry experts to weigh in on this topic.
To read this entire column, which appeared in the October 2018 issue of Design007 Magazine, click here.
More Columns from The Shaughnessy Report
The Shaughnessy Report: Zee Plane! Zee Plane!The Shaughnessy Report: Watt About Power Integrity?
The Shaughnessy Report: Winning the Signal Integrity Battle
The Shaughnessy Report: A Plan for Floor Planning
The Shaughnessy Report: Showing Some Constraint
The Shaughnessy Report: Planning Your Best Route
The Shaughnessy Report: Solving the Data Package Puzzle
The Shaughnessy Report: Always With the Negative Waves