Beyond Design: Radiation and Interference Coupling
Elementary, Mr. Watson: Design Data Packages—Circle of Concern or Circle of Influence?
Fresh PCB Concepts: The Power of a Lunch & Learn for PCB Professionals
BOOK EXCERPT: 'The Printed Circuit Designer’s Guide to... Stackups—The Design within the Design', Chapter 5
January 30, 2024 | I-Connect007 Editorial TeamEstimated reading time: 1 minute
This excerpt is from The Printed Circuit Designer’s Guide to... Stackups—The Design within the Design, Chapter 5 by Bill Hargin, Z-Zero
Chapter 5: Impedance Planning
In my work, I deal with impedance and the entire ecosystem surrounding it daily. Whenever I talk to hardware teams, they often ask “how can two fabricators come back with two totally different designs for the same target impedance?” An example can help answer this question.
A client provided a stackup design which I ran through Z-planner Enterprise software. I compared these results with results from the HyperLynx field solver and the values in the stackups, which are often from unknown tools or with a few details obscured. Figure 5.1 shows a few examples from the same design.
The two stackup environments—Z-planner Enterprise and HyperLynx—showed up to 6-ohm differences for single-ended signals and up to 13 ohms for differential signals, compared to fabricator values. All of the signal-integrity simulations in the world cannot help if we assume a target impedance but the actual fabricated design is off this much. Electronic design automation (EDA) tools such as these can be super useful if you know what they are really modeling. Even here, the results are only as good as the data put in.
Factors That Impact Impedance
The primary parameters that affect impedance are shown in Table 5.1, including their relative contributions.
If you work this list top to bottom, you will be better equipped to dial in your nominal parameters with enough margin. Yet, I regularly see engineering teams straining to perform complex analyses using datasets with questionable merit, and without fully grasping these parameters and priorities. For example, I have never seen detailed, per-layer, percent-copper values from actual PCB layouts being used by PCB fabricators to compute pressed prepreg thicknesses.
Number 4 in Table 5.1 can be particularly problematic. For increased accuracy, keep track of not only the material family, but also resin content (%), and frequency.
Number 5, trace width, is closely tied to fabricator etching processes.
Share on:
Suggested Items
Designers Notebook: Layer Stackup Planning for RF Circuit Boards
04/17/2025 | Vern Solberg -- Column: Designer's NotebookWhen designing multiple layer circuits requiring impedance control, the circuit board designer will work closely with an engineering specialist cognizant of RF printed circuit board design and layout, including mixed-signal applications.
Beyond Design: Key SI Considerations for High-speed PCB Design
03/20/2025 | Barry Olney -- Column: Beyond DesignOver the past two decades, I've simulated numerous complex, high-speed designs for customers creating computer-based products. In addition, I've conducted signal integrity software training courses and led classes on high-speed design. In this month’s column, I will reflect on the key considerations for achieving a successful high-speed PCB design that performs reliably, and I’ll highlight some of the common signal integrity issues that I frequently encounter.
Fresh PCB Concepts: PCB Stackup Strategies—Minimizing Crosstalk and EMI for Signal Integrity
01/09/2025 | Team NCAB -- Column: Fresh PCB ConceptsPCBs are critical components in almost every modern electronic device, but their design goes far beyond routing signals from one point to another. The stackup of a PCB (the arrangement of its layers) has a significant impact on signal integrity, electromagnetic interference (EMI), and crosstalk. The complexity of these issues grows exponentially as designs increase in speed, frequency, and complexity.
Designing for Cost to Manufacture
11/21/2024 | Marcy LaRont, I-Connect007ICAPE's Richard Koensgen, a seasoned field application engineer with a rich background in PCB technology, shares his journey of working with customers and manufacturers through the intricacies of circuit board development and emphasizes the importance of early-stage collaboration with PCB designers. With a focus on tackling the most challenging aspects of PCB design and manufacturing, he discusses everything from layout considerations to the thermal challenges of today's technology when it comes to designing for cost.
Beyond Design: High-speed Rules of Thumb
11/21/2024 | Barry Olney -- Column: Beyond DesignThe idiom “rule of thumb” is often used in electronics design and has its origins in the practice of measuring roughly with one’s thumb. Rules of thumb are easy-to-remember, broadly accurate guides or principles based on practice rather than theory. They are used to help feed our intuition to find a quick solution based on experience. We are often forced to use rules of thumb in PCB design in the absence of expensive analysis tools. We also use them to get quick ballpark figures initially and then fine-tune the numbers with further analysis. We can use rules of thumb as a sanity check to assess whether we are using our tools correctly. In this month’s column, I will present some commonly used and helpful rules for high-speed PCB design.