-
- News
- Books
Featured Books
- design007 Magazine
Latest Issues
Current IssueRules of Thumb
This month, we delve into rules of thumb—which ones work, which ones should be avoided. Rules of thumb are everywhere, but there may be hundreds of rules of thumb for PCB design. How do we separate the wheat from the chaff, so to speak?
Partial HDI
Our expert contributors provide a complete, detailed view of partial HDI this month. Most experienced PCB designers can start using this approach right away, but you need to know these tips, tricks and techniques first.
Silicon to Systems: From Soup to Nuts
This month, we asked our expert contributors to weigh in on silicon to systems—what it means to PCB designers and design engineers, EDA companies, and the rest of the PCB supply chain... from soup to nuts.
- Articles
- Columns
Search Console
- Links
- Media kit
||| MENU - design007 Magazine
Estimated reading time: 2 minutes
Tolerant of Tolerance?
Wouldn’t life be great if everything fit together perfectly? There would be no need for tolerance. However, for that to be the case, everything would need to be ideal and without variation. Therefore, unfortunately (or, maybe, fortunately), we all deal with measurements and materials and situations that are not ideal and are compromised in one way or another.
Often the challenge with tolerance comes down to misunderstanding, and the fact that we all now design with CAD tools which have levels of precision far in excess of the realisable parameters of the mechanical or electrical materials and measurement systems we deal with on a day-to-day basis. Poor understanding of tolerance or being intolerant of tolerance can lead to disappointment.
Or, as attributed to Aristotle, “It is the mark of an educated mind to rest satisfied with the degree of precision which the nature of the subject admits and not to seek exactness where only an approximation is possible.” That translation itself is, of course, only an approximation and requires an appropriate degree of tolerance, but you get the idea.
Looking back a few decades, it is clear that the challenge in terms of tolerance and dimensioning shifted with the move from analog to digital measurements, and electrically there is the beginning of a second shift where high-speed digital systems blur back into the analog realm.
Those of us in the industry for long enough can recall the move from analog voltmeters to digital and from vernier scale to digitally encoded micrometers and calipers. Digressing slightly, I recall a very analog moment when, as a naïve 11-year-old, I and a school friend decided to measure the current available from mains electricity—with an analog AVO meter (safety note: not a wise move!).
The result was a large blue flash, melted meter cables and a visit from the local electricity authority as we had vaporised the main fuse in the supply box. Fortunately, we are both still here, and I still use a trusty old analog AVO meter for electrical jobs around the house. Perhaps that’s why I ended up with a career in the electronics industry, but I have to say it’s not as exciting as that first experience, and maybe that’s not a bad thing.
To continue reading this article click here.
Editor's note: This column originally appeared int eh March 2014 issue of The PCB Design Magazine.
More Columns from The Pulse
The Pulse: Commonsense Cost CuttingThe Pulse: Overconstraining: Short, Slim, and Smooth
The Pulse: Drilling Down on Documentation
The Pulse: New Designer’s (Partial) Guide to Fabrication
The Pulse: Simplest Stackups Specified
The Pulse: Rough Roughness Reasoning
The Pulse: Industry Organizations Keep Knowledge Alive
The Pulse: Instilling an Informal Information Culture