-
-
News
News Highlights
- Books
Featured Books
- design007 Magazine
Latest Issues
Current IssueLearning to Speak ‘Fab’
Our expert contributors clear up many of the miscommunication problems between PCB designers and their fab and assembly stakeholders. As you will see, a little extra planning early in the design cycle can go a long way toward maintaining open lines of communication with the fab and assembly folks.
Training New Designers
Where will we find the next generation of PCB designers and design engineers? Once we locate them, how will we train and educate them? What will PCB designers of the future need to master to deal with tomorrow’s technology?
The Designer of the Future
Our expert contributors peer into their crystal balls and offer their thoughts on the designers and design engineers of tomorrow, and what their jobs will look like.
- Articles
- Columns
Search Console
- Links
- Media kit
||| MENU - design007 Magazine
Estimated reading time: 1 minute

Transitioning from FR-4 to High-Frequency Materials, Revisited
This is a topic I have written about a few times, most recently in my August 2017 column, and with good reason. The answer, “it depends,” typically annoys engineers; fortunately, there is a list of items that can help the PCB designer answer the question of when to transition from FR-4 to high-frequency materials.
The bottom line is that FR-4 materials have been around a long time, and they work well within the range they are formulated to work. The same can be said for high-frequency circuit materials, which are also thought of as low-loss materials. However, there is a definite gray area that can muddy the waters when a designer is weighing a possible decision to switch from FR-4 to low-loss materials. High-frequency materials also have inherent properties that can benefit some applications that are not related to high frequencies or low loss. The material property differences between FR-4 and high-frequency materials are critical for the designer to understand when considering the use of either material.
It may be a good idea to compare properties of FR-4 to a commonly used high-frequency material. The low-loss material to be considered here is the RO4835 laminate. The FR-4 material that will be examined is a higher-quality, high-Tg FR-4 material. This comparison is mostly meant to trigger a designer’s thought process; there are admittedly exceptions with these materials and the properties mentioned.
To read this entire column, which appeared in the August 2018 issue of Design007 Magazine, click here.
More Columns from Lightning Speed Laminates
Lightning Speed Laminates: Millimeter-wave Properties and PCB Design ChallengesLightning Speed Laminates: Optimizing Thermal Management for Wireless Communication Systems
Lightning Speed Laminates: Test Vehicles for PCB Electrical Material Characterization
Lightning Speed Laminates: Optimum Thermal Stability Considerations
Lightning Speed Laminates: Thermal Management Isn’t Getting Easier
Lightning Speed Laminates: Benefits of High-Performance Hybrid Multilayer PCBs
Lightning Speed Laminates: An Overview of Copper Foils
Lightning Speed Laminates: The Importance of Circuit Features for Millimeter-Wave Applications