-
- News
- Books
Featured Books
- I-Connect007 Magazine
Latest Issues
Current Issue
Beyond the Rulebook
What happens when the rule book is no longer useful, or worse, was never written in the first place? In today’s fast-moving electronics landscape, we’re increasingly asked to design and build what has no precedent, no proven path, and no tidy checklist to follow. This is where “Design for Invention” begins.
March Madness
From the growing role of AI in design tools to the challenge of managing cumulative tolerances, these articles in this issue examine the technical details, design choices, and manufacturing considerations that determine whether a board works as intended.
Looking Forward to APEX EXPO 2026
I-Connect007 Magazine previews APEX EXPO 2026, covering everything from the show floor to the technical conference. For PCB designers, we move past the dreaded auto-router and spotlight AI design tools that actually matter.
- Articles
- Columns
- Links
- Media kit
||| MENU - I-Connect007 Magazine
Estimated reading time: 1 minute
Transitioning from FR-4 to High-Frequency Materials, Revisited
This is a topic I have written about a few times, most recently in my August 2017 column, and with good reason. The answer, “it depends,” typically annoys engineers; fortunately, there is a list of items that can help the PCB designer answer the question of when to transition from FR-4 to high-frequency materials.
The bottom line is that FR-4 materials have been around a long time, and they work well within the range they are formulated to work. The same can be said for high-frequency circuit materials, which are also thought of as low-loss materials. However, there is a definite gray area that can muddy the waters when a designer is weighing a possible decision to switch from FR-4 to low-loss materials. High-frequency materials also have inherent properties that can benefit some applications that are not related to high frequencies or low loss. The material property differences between FR-4 and high-frequency materials are critical for the designer to understand when considering the use of either material.
It may be a good idea to compare properties of FR-4 to a commonly used high-frequency material. The low-loss material to be considered here is the RO4835 laminate. The FR-4 material that will be examined is a higher-quality, high-Tg FR-4 material. This comparison is mostly meant to trigger a designer’s thought process; there are admittedly exceptions with these materials and the properties mentioned.
To read this entire column, which appeared in the August 2018 issue of Design007 Magazine, click here.
More Columns from Lightning Speed Laminates
Lightning Speed Laminates: Millimeter-wave Properties and PCB Design ChallengesLightning Speed Laminates: Optimizing Thermal Management for Wireless Communication Systems
Lightning Speed Laminates: Test Vehicles for PCB Electrical Material Characterization
Lightning Speed Laminates: Optimum Thermal Stability Considerations
Lightning Speed Laminates: Thermal Management Isn’t Getting Easier
Lightning Speed Laminates: Benefits of High-Performance Hybrid Multilayer PCBs
Lightning Speed Laminates: An Overview of Copper Foils
Lightning Speed Laminates: The Importance of Circuit Features for Millimeter-Wave Applications