-
- News
- Books
Featured Books
- pcb007 Magazine
Latest Issues
Current IssueVoices of the Industry
We take the pulse of the PCB industry by sharing insights from leading fabricators and suppliers in this month's issue. We've gathered their thoughts on the new U.S. administration, spending, the war in Ukraine, and their most pressing needs. It’s an eye-opening and enlightening look behind the curtain.
The Essential Guide to Surface Finishes
We go back to basics this month with a recount of a little history, and look forward to addressing the many challenges that high density, high frequency, adhesion, SI, and corrosion concerns for harsh environments bring to the fore. We compare and contrast surface finishes by type and application, take a hard look at the many iterations of gold plating, and address palladium as a surface finish.
It's Show Time!
In this month’s issue of PCB007 Magazine we reimagine the possibilities featuring stories all about IPC APEX EXPO 2025—covering what to look forward to, and what you don’t want to miss.
- Articles
- Columns
Search Console
- Links
- Media kit
||| MENU - pcb007 Magazine
Estimated reading time: 1 minute

Quest for Reliability: Sunshine and Circuit Boards
Note from the editor: IPC APEX EXPO may be over, but this column by Eric Camden serves as a great introduction to IPC standards. If you've been thinking about getting involved with manufacturing and assembly standards but weren't sure how to go about it, this column is a must-read for you.
I have said it many times before, and will say it again: If you are new to the industry, it is important to understand how IPC standards are structured for each part of the assembly process from raw parts to final packaging. The reason this is so important is the number of companies that rely on IPC standards for assembly criteria is already substantial and ever-growing. There is a very real issue with veteran employees retiring and not passing on their tribal knowledge, which impacts new recruits.
We have worked with the same companies on the same reliability issues over the years, and the only thing that is different is the engineering contact. And whenever a question pops up at a company, and there is no clear answer, you can reach for one of these standards and find the answer, or get you pointed in the right direction, at a minimum. These standards are written and reviewed by some of the most experienced people in our industry who have been there, done that, and use that knowledge to help shape the standards.
After you have gained at least a basic understanding of how the standards work, then you can take the next step and get involved with the task groups. This allows you to get deeper in the weeds of setting the standards, which gives you a much better understanding of how and why certain decisions were made. If you disagree with something currently in a standard, you are always open to bring your supporting data and make your case for a change in the next revision.
To read this entire column, which appeared in the January 2020 issue of SMT007 Magazine, click here.
More Columns from Quest for Reliability
Quest for Reliability: Here We Go (Virtual) AgainQuest for Reliability: Put Your Operators in the Driver’s Seat
Quest for Reliability: What’s Lurking in the Shadows?
Quest for Reliability: Reliability Starts at the Bottom
Quest for Reliability: Correlating COVID-19 With Reliability?
Quest for Reliability: Big Trouble Comes in Tiny Packages
Quest for Reliability: New Solder, Same Old Testing
Quest for Reliability: Improving Reliability for Free